Antibiotic Susceptibility of Mastitogenic Bacteria Isolated From Clinical Mastitis Cows in Midlands Province, Zimbabwe

C. Gufe, V. Bokosha, J. Marumure, Z. Makuvara, S. Manatsa, B. Mbonjani, I. Petzer, P. Makaya
{"title":"Antibiotic Susceptibility of Mastitogenic Bacteria Isolated From Clinical Mastitis Cows in Midlands Province, Zimbabwe","authors":"C. Gufe, V. Bokosha, J. Marumure, Z. Makuvara, S. Manatsa, B. Mbonjani, I. Petzer, P. Makaya","doi":"10.4314/TVJ.V35I2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mastitis is a global challenge for the dairy industry and mastitogenic bacteria play a critical role among other causes. Many mastitogenic bacteria are becoming resistant to single or combination antibiotic therapy, making mastitis cases difficult to cure. Nevertheless, there is insufficient evidence on the occurrence and antibiotic resistance patterns of mastitogenic bacteria in commercial dairy and communal farms in the Midland Province of Zimbabwe that might support a holistic approach to mastitis mitigation. A cross-sectional study aimed to isolate and evaluate the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of mastitogenic bacteria from cattle with clinical mastitis was conducted. A total of 164 milk samples were analyzed, of which 36.6% (60) samples were collected from commercial farmers, and 63.4% (104) came from communal farmers. The samples were cultured on standard media and sensitivity patterns of the identified bacteria were tested against 14 antibiotics using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. All milk samples from communal farms were positive for mastitogenic bacteria compared to 88% (53) of mastitogenic positive milk samples from commercial farms. The most common microorganisms from all the 157-mastitogenic positive milk samples were Staphylococcus aureus (37.5%) and Escherichia coli (23.3%). The highest resistance was observed against Penicillin, Erythromycin, Ampicillin, and Lincomycin, whereas most isolates were susceptible to Sulphamethoxazole, gentamycin, neomycin, kanamycin, cloxacillin, ertapenem, ceftriaxone, Amp-Ampicillin, amikacin, vancomycin, and tetracycline. Futher research to investigate the significance of resistant mastogenic bacteria in terms of Veterinary costs, production losses and potential public health transmission of antibiotic resistant mastogenic bacteria is recommended","PeriodicalId":181497,"journal":{"name":"Tanzania Veterinary Journal","volume":"11 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tanzania Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/TVJ.V35I2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Mastitis is a global challenge for the dairy industry and mastitogenic bacteria play a critical role among other causes. Many mastitogenic bacteria are becoming resistant to single or combination antibiotic therapy, making mastitis cases difficult to cure. Nevertheless, there is insufficient evidence on the occurrence and antibiotic resistance patterns of mastitogenic bacteria in commercial dairy and communal farms in the Midland Province of Zimbabwe that might support a holistic approach to mastitis mitigation. A cross-sectional study aimed to isolate and evaluate the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of mastitogenic bacteria from cattle with clinical mastitis was conducted. A total of 164 milk samples were analyzed, of which 36.6% (60) samples were collected from commercial farmers, and 63.4% (104) came from communal farmers. The samples were cultured on standard media and sensitivity patterns of the identified bacteria were tested against 14 antibiotics using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. All milk samples from communal farms were positive for mastitogenic bacteria compared to 88% (53) of mastitogenic positive milk samples from commercial farms. The most common microorganisms from all the 157-mastitogenic positive milk samples were Staphylococcus aureus (37.5%) and Escherichia coli (23.3%). The highest resistance was observed against Penicillin, Erythromycin, Ampicillin, and Lincomycin, whereas most isolates were susceptible to Sulphamethoxazole, gentamycin, neomycin, kanamycin, cloxacillin, ertapenem, ceftriaxone, Amp-Ampicillin, amikacin, vancomycin, and tetracycline. Futher research to investigate the significance of resistant mastogenic bacteria in terms of Veterinary costs, production losses and potential public health transmission of antibiotic resistant mastogenic bacteria is recommended
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
津巴布韦米德兰兹省临床乳腺炎奶牛乳腺炎原性细菌的抗生素敏感性研究
乳腺炎是乳品行业面临的全球性挑战,乳腺炎细菌在其他原因中起着关键作用。许多乳腺炎原细菌对单一或联合抗生素治疗产生耐药性,使乳腺炎病例难以治愈。然而,关于津巴布韦米德兰省商业奶牛场和公共农场中乳腺炎原细菌的发生和抗生素耐药性模式的证据不足,可能支持采取整体方法减轻乳腺炎。一项横断面研究旨在分离和评估临床乳腺炎牛乳腺炎原细菌的抗生素敏感性模式。共分析了164份牛奶样本,其中36.6%(60份)来自商业奶农,63.4%(104份)来自社区奶农。样品在标准培养基上培养,采用Kirby-Bauer圆盘扩散法检测鉴定的细菌对14种抗生素的敏感性。来自公共农场的所有牛奶样本均呈乳腺炎原菌阳性,而来自商业农场的乳腺炎原菌阳性牛奶样本为88%(53)。157份乳源性阳性样品中最常见的微生物为金黄色葡萄球菌(37.5%)和大肠杆菌(23.3%)。对青霉素、红霉素、氨苄西林和林可霉素的耐药率最高,对磺胺甲恶唑、庆大霉素、新霉素、卡那霉素、氯西林、厄他培南、头孢曲松、氨苄西林、阿米卡星、万古霉素和四环素的耐药率最高。建议进一步研究耐药乳酸菌在兽医成本、生产损失和耐药乳酸菌潜在公共卫生传播方面的意义
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sero-prevalence of brucellosis in ruminants and awareness of stakeholders on the disease in wet markets in Maswa district, Tanzania Cross Sectional Study of Small East African Goat Ovarian Morphology During Wet and Dry Seasons A Comparative Study of Productive and Reproductive Performance between Mpwapwa Breed Cattle and Their Crosses Quantification of antibiotic resistance genes in wildlife ungulates in Ngorongoro Conservation area and Mikumi National Park, Tanzania Comparative Evaluation of Growth Performance and Feed Utilization of Improved Nigerian Indigenous Broiler and Different Crossbreds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1