Comparison of Matrix Factorization and Graph-Based Models for Summary Extraction

P. Raj, Apoorv Bhandari, Ashutosh Kumar Singh, Mrinal Puri, Shaily Malik
{"title":"Comparison of Matrix Factorization and Graph-Based Models for Summary Extraction","authors":"P. Raj, Apoorv Bhandari, Ashutosh Kumar Singh, Mrinal Puri, Shaily Malik","doi":"10.17577/ijertv9is080007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With increasing number of users contributing in digital text generation, it becomes necessary to have some tools to extract relevant information from these text documents. Manually performing this task is a time consuming and tidious process. Both Matrix Factorization Based and Graph-Based Models are unsupervised models for extracting a summary from text documents. As the training phase is not required for both these methods, they are extremely fast. Both these methods construct an intermediate representation of a text document and use it to assign a score to each sentence present in the text document. In this paper, we discussed the underlying concept behind both the methods and compare them on the basis of quality of summary extracted.","PeriodicalId":351157,"journal":{"name":"2019 6th International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom)","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 6th International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17577/ijertv9is080007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With increasing number of users contributing in digital text generation, it becomes necessary to have some tools to extract relevant information from these text documents. Manually performing this task is a time consuming and tidious process. Both Matrix Factorization Based and Graph-Based Models are unsupervised models for extracting a summary from text documents. As the training phase is not required for both these methods, they are extremely fast. Both these methods construct an intermediate representation of a text document and use it to assign a score to each sentence present in the text document. In this paper, we discussed the underlying concept behind both the methods and compare them on the basis of quality of summary extracted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
摘要提取的矩阵分解和基于图的模型的比较
随着越来越多的用户参与到数字文本生成中,有必要使用一些工具从这些文本文档中提取相关信息。手动执行此任务是一个耗时且繁琐的过程。基于矩阵分解和基于图的模型都是用于从文本文档中提取摘要的无监督模型。由于这两种方法都不需要训练阶段,因此它们非常快。这两种方法都构造文本文档的中间表示,并使用它为文本文档中的每个句子分配分数。在本文中,我们讨论了这两种方法背后的基本概念,并在提取摘要质量的基础上对它们进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Matrix Factorization and Graph-Based Models for Summary Extraction Blockchain Distributed Cloud Storage Network Tool (BCCNT)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1