THE IMPACT OF NEGOTIATED LESSON PLAN ON INTERMEDIATE EFL LEARNERS’ VOCABULARY KNOWLEDGE

Mona Porkand, Majid Pourmohammadi
{"title":"THE IMPACT OF NEGOTIATED LESSON PLAN ON INTERMEDIATE EFL LEARNERS’ VOCABULARY KNOWLEDGE","authors":"Mona Porkand, Majid Pourmohammadi","doi":"10.46827/ejse.v9i1.4678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study investigated the effect of the traditional lesson planning determined by teachers and the negotiated lesson plan (NLP) on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ vocabulary knowledge. To this end, a copy of Solution Placement Test was administered to 47 learners, and 36 participants at the intermediate level of language proficiency were homogeneously selected. They were then divided into two groups of 18 participants as the experimental and the control groups. Next, the vocabulary pretest was conducted to measure the participants’ vocabulary knowledge and check the homogeneity of the groups at the beginning of the treatment. The learners in the experimental group shared their ideas in small groups, had the key role and enjoyed shared-decision making deciding what they would do for the next sessions of the course. The learners in the control group had no role in determining the course materials. The result of data analysis based on their pretest and posttest scores of vocabulary showed that the participants of the experimental group became better vocabulary learners after receiving NLP treatment compared to those in the pre-determined lesson plan that received unnoticeable results from the pretest to the posttest. The teachers and the material developers need to consider the negotiated lesson planning into account so that the issue of learner involvement in instructional materials is paid attention to.  Article visualizations:","PeriodicalId":378693,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Special Education Research","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Special Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46827/ejse.v9i1.4678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study investigated the effect of the traditional lesson planning determined by teachers and the negotiated lesson plan (NLP) on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ vocabulary knowledge. To this end, a copy of Solution Placement Test was administered to 47 learners, and 36 participants at the intermediate level of language proficiency were homogeneously selected. They were then divided into two groups of 18 participants as the experimental and the control groups. Next, the vocabulary pretest was conducted to measure the participants’ vocabulary knowledge and check the homogeneity of the groups at the beginning of the treatment. The learners in the experimental group shared their ideas in small groups, had the key role and enjoyed shared-decision making deciding what they would do for the next sessions of the course. The learners in the control group had no role in determining the course materials. The result of data analysis based on their pretest and posttest scores of vocabulary showed that the participants of the experimental group became better vocabulary learners after receiving NLP treatment compared to those in the pre-determined lesson plan that received unnoticeable results from the pretest to the posttest. The teachers and the material developers need to consider the negotiated lesson planning into account so that the issue of learner involvement in instructional materials is paid attention to.  Article visualizations:
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
协商式教案对中级英语学习者词汇知识的影响
本研究考察了传统的教师定课计划和协商式课程计划对伊朗中级英语学习者词汇知识的影响。为此,对47名学习者进行了一份解决方案放置测试的副本,并均匀地选择了36名中等语言水平的参与者。然后他们被分成两组,每组18人,分别是实验组和对照组。接下来,进行词汇前测,测量被试在治疗开始时的词汇知识,检查组间的同质性。实验组的学习者在小组中分享他们的想法,扮演关键角色,享受共同决策,决定他们下一节课要做什么。控制组的学习者在确定课程材料方面没有任何作用。基于词汇前测和后测成绩的数据分析结果表明,实验组的参与者在接受NLP治疗后成为了更好的词汇学习者,而预定课程计划的参与者从前测到后测的结果并不明显。教师和教材开发人员需要考虑协商的课程计划,从而关注学习者对教材的参与问题。可视化条
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ESCAPE ROOM: ESCAPE GAMES AS A SCIENCE LEARNING TOOL PLAYFUL ACTIVITIES FOR TEACHING SUSTAINABILITY IN PRIMARY SCHOOL THROUGH EDUCATION 5.0 WELL-BEING, INCLUSION, DISABILITY, AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE CONTEXT OF MODERNITY: ANALYSES AND PERSPECTIVES TEACHERS’ SENTIMENTS, ATTITUDES AND CONCERNS ABOUT INCLUSIVE EDUCATION AND SELF-EFFICACY FOR INCLUSIVE PRACTICES INVESTIGATING THE BARRIERS TO USING ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN GREEK SPECIAL EDUCATION CLASSROOMS: EFL TEACHERS’ PERSPECTIVES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1