Community-University Research Partnerships: Reflections on the Canadian Social Economy Experience

Sherry Ann Chapman
{"title":"Community-University Research Partnerships: Reflections on the Canadian Social Economy Experience","authors":"Sherry Ann Chapman","doi":"10.21225/D5BS4N","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the last months of the liberal federal administration of Paul Martin in Canada (2003–2006), after a sustained lobbying campaign led by Quebec’s Chantier de l’economie sociale and the Canadian Community Economic Development Network (CCED Network), funds were allocated to support the social economy sector of Canada, and a call was issued for research proposals on the social economy ‘conducted by academic researchers in partnership with community based organizations’. While the subsequent administration cancelled the general program everywhere except in Quebec, it retained the $15 million research program, which was modelled on the existing Community University Research Alliance (CURA), funded by the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC). Through a peer review process, SSHRC selected and funded six regional nodes and one national hub to pursue this research agenda from 2006 to 2012. This unprecedented level of resources for a pan-Canadian exploration of the social economy, known as Canadian Social Economy Research Partnerships (CSERP), resulted in almost 400 studies, involving 16 universities and over 140 community-based organisations. This volume, Community-university research partnerships: Reflections on the Canadian social economy experience, describes the organisation of this large research effort. It provides context for chapters submitted by the hub and nodes, and concludes with directions for the future. A second volume, Assembling understandings, summarises the research findings across all the nodes. The third volume is Canadian public policy and the social economy. All three are available as free e-books at the website: http://socialeconomyhub.ca. In this research, the social economy included not only the voluntary non-profit sector, as Americans might define it, but also cooperatives, social enterprises and informal, emerging efforts. Four of the node principal investigators knew each other from prior membership in a professional association for studying cooperatives. The national hub for this research was located at the University of Victoria and co-directed by Ian McPherson, of the Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement Vol 6 (2013): 228–30 © UTSePress and the author","PeriodicalId":404529,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21225/D5BS4N","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

During the last months of the liberal federal administration of Paul Martin in Canada (2003–2006), after a sustained lobbying campaign led by Quebec’s Chantier de l’economie sociale and the Canadian Community Economic Development Network (CCED Network), funds were allocated to support the social economy sector of Canada, and a call was issued for research proposals on the social economy ‘conducted by academic researchers in partnership with community based organizations’. While the subsequent administration cancelled the general program everywhere except in Quebec, it retained the $15 million research program, which was modelled on the existing Community University Research Alliance (CURA), funded by the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC). Through a peer review process, SSHRC selected and funded six regional nodes and one national hub to pursue this research agenda from 2006 to 2012. This unprecedented level of resources for a pan-Canadian exploration of the social economy, known as Canadian Social Economy Research Partnerships (CSERP), resulted in almost 400 studies, involving 16 universities and over 140 community-based organisations. This volume, Community-university research partnerships: Reflections on the Canadian social economy experience, describes the organisation of this large research effort. It provides context for chapters submitted by the hub and nodes, and concludes with directions for the future. A second volume, Assembling understandings, summarises the research findings across all the nodes. The third volume is Canadian public policy and the social economy. All three are available as free e-books at the website: http://socialeconomyhub.ca. In this research, the social economy included not only the voluntary non-profit sector, as Americans might define it, but also cooperatives, social enterprises and informal, emerging efforts. Four of the node principal investigators knew each other from prior membership in a professional association for studying cooperatives. The national hub for this research was located at the University of Victoria and co-directed by Ian McPherson, of the Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement Vol 6 (2013): 228–30 © UTSePress and the author
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区-大学研究伙伴关系:对加拿大社会经济经验的反思
在加拿大保罗·马丁自由党联邦政府的最后几个月(2003-2006年),在魁北克社会经济促进会和加拿大社区经济发展网络(CCED网络)领导的持续游说运动之后,资金被分配给支持加拿大社会经济部门,并呼吁“由学术研究人员与社区组织合作进行”的社会经济研究提案。虽然后来的政府取消了除魁北克以外的所有地方的一般计划,但它保留了1500万美元的研究计划,该计划以现有的社区大学研究联盟(CURA)为蓝本,由加拿大社会科学和人文研究委员会(SSHRC)资助。通过同行评审过程,SSHRC选择并资助了六个区域节点和一个国家中心,以在2006年至2012年期间开展这项研究议程。加拿大社会经济研究伙伴关系(CSERP)是一项泛加拿大社会经济探索的前所未有的资源,它产生了近400项研究,涉及16所大学和140多个社区组织。本卷,社区大学研究伙伴关系:对加拿大社会经济经验的反思,描述了这一大型研究工作的组织。它为中心和节点提交的章节提供了上下文,并总结了未来的方向。第二卷,组装理解,总结了所有节点的研究成果。第三卷是加拿大的公共政策和社会经济。这三本书都可以在网站http://socialeconomyhub.ca上以免费电子书的形式获得。在这项研究中,社会经济不仅包括美国人可能定义的自愿非营利部门,还包括合作社、社会企业和非正式的新兴努力。其中四位主要研究人员是在一个研究合作社的专业协会中相识的。这项研究的国家中心位于维多利亚大学,由《门户:国际社区研究与参与杂志》第6卷(2013):228-30©UTSePress和作者Ian McPherson共同指导
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Collaborative Knowledge Creation: Practice, Tools, Concepts A Season for Everything: A Journal Well Done and a New One on Its Way The Nature of Transformation: Environmental Adult Education Working and Learning: An Introduction Aesthetic Practices and Adult Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1