Comparison of P wave durations as assessed with the bipolar and unipolar atrial intracardiac electrograms: Applicability to QuickOpt™

X. Min, P. Demers, D. Muller, J. Snell, P. Levine, E. Ostrow
{"title":"Comparison of P wave durations as assessed with the bipolar and unipolar atrial intracardiac electrograms: Applicability to QuickOpt™","authors":"X. Min, P. Demers, D. Muller, J. Snell, P. Levine, E. Ostrow","doi":"10.1109/CIC.2007.4745600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies have shown that inter-atrial conduction time (IACT) can be used to estimate optimal PV delays. QuickOpt utilizes the atrial EGM (AEGM) and measures P-wave duration (PW) to estimate the IACT. This study compares PW between bipolar (Bi) and unipolar (Uni) AEGMs in patients with either a pacemaker (PP) or a CRT-D pulse generator. Bipolar (Bi) and Unipolar (Uni) AEGMs were obtained from 42 PP and 18 CRT-D pts. In the PP, PWs associated with Bi and Uni AEGMs were close (114plusmn19 ms vs. 110plusmn20 ms). Intra-patient difference was 3.9plusmn8.7 ms, and the 95% confidence interval for the difference was (1.2, 6.6). With CRT-D, PWs were 79plusmn18.4 ms and 81plusmn14 ms for Bi and Uni sensing and the intra-patient difference was -1.2plusmn14.9 ms. In 18 PP, the difference between ECG and either bipolar or unipolar PW was 4.8plusmn17.8 ms and 0.9 ms plusmn 15.5 ms respectively. PWs were similar between unipolar AEGMs, bipolar AEGMs, and surface ECG.","PeriodicalId":406683,"journal":{"name":"2007 Computers in Cardiology","volume":"275 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 Computers in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIC.2007.4745600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies have shown that inter-atrial conduction time (IACT) can be used to estimate optimal PV delays. QuickOpt utilizes the atrial EGM (AEGM) and measures P-wave duration (PW) to estimate the IACT. This study compares PW between bipolar (Bi) and unipolar (Uni) AEGMs in patients with either a pacemaker (PP) or a CRT-D pulse generator. Bipolar (Bi) and Unipolar (Uni) AEGMs were obtained from 42 PP and 18 CRT-D pts. In the PP, PWs associated with Bi and Uni AEGMs were close (114plusmn19 ms vs. 110plusmn20 ms). Intra-patient difference was 3.9plusmn8.7 ms, and the 95% confidence interval for the difference was (1.2, 6.6). With CRT-D, PWs were 79plusmn18.4 ms and 81plusmn14 ms for Bi and Uni sensing and the intra-patient difference was -1.2plusmn14.9 ms. In 18 PP, the difference between ECG and either bipolar or unipolar PW was 4.8plusmn17.8 ms and 0.9 ms plusmn 15.5 ms respectively. PWs were similar between unipolar AEGMs, bipolar AEGMs, and surface ECG.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与双极和单极心房心内电图评估的P波持续时间的比较:适用于QuickOpt™
研究表明,房间传导时间(IACT)可用于估计最佳PV延迟。QuickOpt利用心房EGM (AEGM)和测量p波持续时间(PW)来估计IACT。本研究比较了使用起搏器(PP)或CRT-D脉冲发生器的患者双极(Bi)和单极(Uni) egms的PW。从42名PP和18名CRT-D患者中获得双极(Bi)和单极(Uni) egms。在PP中,与Bi和Uni AEGMs相关的PWs接近(114plusmn19 ms vs. 110plusmn20 ms)。患者内差异为3.9±8.7 ms,差异的95%置信区间为(1.2,6.6)。ct - d检测Bi和Uni的PWs分别为79plusmn18.4 ms和81plusmn14 ms,患者内差异为-1.2plusmn14.9 ms。在18pp时,心电图与双极或单极PW的差异分别为4.8 ms + 17.8 ms和0.9 ms + 15.5 ms。单极心电图、双极心电图和体表心电图的PWs相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementation and use of a patient data management system in the intensive care unit: A two-year experience Modelling effects of sotalol on T-wave morphology Vulnerability to reentry in a 3D regionally ischemic ventricular slab preparation: A simulation study Evaluation of multi-component Electrocardiogram beat detection algorithms: Implications of three different noise artifacts Dynamic 4D blood flow representation in the aorta and analysis from cine-MRI in patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1