Validation of the New Gamma Exponent Model for Axial Crack Assessment in Oil and Gas Pipelines

C. Scott
{"title":"Validation of the New Gamma Exponent Model for Axial Crack Assessment in Oil and Gas Pipelines","authors":"C. Scott","doi":"10.1115/pvp2020-21003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the late 1960s and early 1970s, the researchers of the NG-18 committee at the Battelle Institute in Columbus, Ohio completed a seminal study on the failure pressures of flaws in oil and gas pipelines. One of the key developments was the “log-secant” equation for the assessment of axial crack-like flaws. The model was later modified to improve its accuracy and precision.\n The Gamma Exponent Model (GEM) was recently developed for assessment of axial crack-like flaws in pipelines. The developer recognized that the NG-18 log-secant model was theoretically derived on length, and then empirically corrected for depth. The new GEM was theoretically derived on depth, and then empirically corrected for length. The new model is similar in mathematical form to the original NG-18 log-secant model, but there are some key differences.\n This work is a validation study of the GEM using axial crack failure pressure data from the industry literature. Laboratory tests with machined flaws, and hydrotest and in-service failures with natural metallurgical flaws, are also considered. The results of the GEM are compared to the equivalent failure predictions using other models. The strengths and limitations of the new model are discussed in the context of improved accuracy and precision for crack assessments.","PeriodicalId":150804,"journal":{"name":"Volume 3: Design and Analysis","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 3: Design and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2020-21003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the late 1960s and early 1970s, the researchers of the NG-18 committee at the Battelle Institute in Columbus, Ohio completed a seminal study on the failure pressures of flaws in oil and gas pipelines. One of the key developments was the “log-secant” equation for the assessment of axial crack-like flaws. The model was later modified to improve its accuracy and precision. The Gamma Exponent Model (GEM) was recently developed for assessment of axial crack-like flaws in pipelines. The developer recognized that the NG-18 log-secant model was theoretically derived on length, and then empirically corrected for depth. The new GEM was theoretically derived on depth, and then empirically corrected for length. The new model is similar in mathematical form to the original NG-18 log-secant model, but there are some key differences. This work is a validation study of the GEM using axial crack failure pressure data from the industry literature. Laboratory tests with machined flaws, and hydrotest and in-service failures with natural metallurgical flaws, are also considered. The results of the GEM are compared to the equivalent failure predictions using other models. The strengths and limitations of the new model are discussed in the context of improved accuracy and precision for crack assessments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
油气管道轴向裂纹评价新Gamma指数模型的验证
在20世纪60年代末和70年代初,俄亥俄州哥伦布市巴特尔研究所NG-18委员会的研究人员完成了一项关于石油和天然气管道缺陷失效压力的开创性研究。其中一个关键的发展是“对数-割线”方程的轴向裂纹样缺陷的评估。后来对该模型进行了修改,以提高其准确性和精密度。伽马指数模型(GEM)是近年来发展起来的用于管道轴向类裂纹缺陷评估的模型。开发商认识到NG-18对数-割线模型在理论上是根据长度推导出来的,然后根据深度进行经验修正。新的GEM从理论上推导出深度,然后根据长度进行经验校正。新模型在数学形式上与原来的NG-18对数-割线模型相似,但有一些关键的区别。这项工作是利用工业文献中的轴向裂纹破坏压力数据对GEM进行验证研究。还考虑了带有机械加工缺陷的实验室试验,以及带有自然冶金缺陷的水压试验和在役失效。将GEM的结果与使用其他模型的等效失效预测进行比较。在提高裂纹评估的准确性和精度的背景下,讨论了新模型的优点和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Study of Packed Catalyst Bed Stresses for Outward Radial Flow Reactors Alternative Design Approach by Finite Element Analysis for High Pressure Equipment A Review of Temperature Reduction Methods in Codes and Standards for Pipe Supports Elephant Foot Buckling Analysis of Large Unanchored Oil Storage Tanks With Tapered Shells Subjected to Foundation Settlement Development of Stress Intensification Factors for Collared Type Piping Joints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1