Deterring cheating using a complex assessment design

Sonja Bjelobaba
{"title":"Deterring cheating using a complex assessment design","authors":"Sonja Bjelobaba","doi":"10.47216/literacytrek.936053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Attempts to translate written examinations normally conducted in a lecture hall to an online environment during emergency remote learning in response to COVID-19 have not proved entirely successful, and have led to a sharp increase in cases of suspected misconduct. This paper describes a case study which gives insights on the relationship between assessment design and academic integrity: Is it possible to deter students from cheating by means of assessment design? Previous research does promote certain assessment types, but also indicates that there is no single assessment type that students think is impossible to cheat on. The solution proposed in this paper is therefore to add complexity to the mixture. An alternative complex assessment design comprising several steps is introduced and exemplified by an assessment procedure piloted in a grammar course for preservice language teachers in mother tongue tuition. The design promotes academic integrity, signature pedagogy, student-centred learning, and collaboration within a community of practice in an online setting.","PeriodicalId":390917,"journal":{"name":"The Literacy Trek","volume":"188 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Literacy Trek","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47216/literacytrek.936053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Attempts to translate written examinations normally conducted in a lecture hall to an online environment during emergency remote learning in response to COVID-19 have not proved entirely successful, and have led to a sharp increase in cases of suspected misconduct. This paper describes a case study which gives insights on the relationship between assessment design and academic integrity: Is it possible to deter students from cheating by means of assessment design? Previous research does promote certain assessment types, but also indicates that there is no single assessment type that students think is impossible to cheat on. The solution proposed in this paper is therefore to add complexity to the mixture. An alternative complex assessment design comprising several steps is introduced and exemplified by an assessment procedure piloted in a grammar course for preservice language teachers in mother tongue tuition. The design promotes academic integrity, signature pedagogy, student-centred learning, and collaboration within a community of practice in an online setting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用复杂的评估设计来阻止作弊
在应对COVID-19的紧急远程学习期间,将通常在演讲厅进行的笔试转换为在线环境的尝试并不完全成功,并导致涉嫌不当行为的案件急剧增加。本文描述了一个案例研究,该案例分析了评估设计与学术诚信之间的关系:是否有可能通过评估设计来阻止学生作弊?先前的研究确实促进了某些评估类型,但也表明,没有一种评估类型是学生认为不可能作弊的。因此,本文提出的解决方案是增加混合物的复杂性。介绍了另一种复杂的评估设计,包括几个步骤,并举例说明了在母语教学的职前语言教师语法课程中试点的评估程序。该设计促进了学术诚信、特色教学法、以学生为中心的学习以及在线环境下实践社区内的协作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Interactive Conversation with a Chatbot: Does ChatGPT Know Standard Phraseology in Aviation English? Investigating Attitudes toward Plagiarism among Post-Graduate ELT Students Online Testing and Assessment in the English as a Foreign Language Context: Teachers' Perspectives An autoethnographic study: Self-growth approach for teacher educators in training tech-effective teachers Students’ Metaphoric Perceptions Regarding Online Education Process and Praxis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1