Overview of the Fourth Social Media Mining for Health (SMM4H) Shared Tasks at ACL 2019

D. Weissenbacher, A. Sarker, A. Magge, A. Daughton, K. O’Connor, Michael J. Paul, G. Gonzalez-Hernandez
{"title":"Overview of the Fourth Social Media Mining for Health (SMM4H) Shared Tasks at ACL 2019","authors":"D. Weissenbacher, A. Sarker, A. Magge, A. Daughton, K. O’Connor, Michael J. Paul, G. Gonzalez-Hernandez","doi":"10.18653/v1/W19-3203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The number of users of social media continues to grow, with nearly half of adults worldwide and two-thirds of all American adults using social networking. Advances in automated data processing, machine learning and NLP present the possibility of utilizing this massive data source for biomedical and public health applications, if researchers address the methodological challenges unique to this media. We present the Social Media Mining for Health Shared Tasks collocated with the ACL at Florence in 2019, which address these challenges for health monitoring and surveillance, utilizing state of the art techniques for processing noisy, real-world, and substantially creative language expressions from social media users. For the fourth execution of this challenge, we proposed four different tasks. Task 1 asked participants to distinguish tweets reporting an adverse drug reaction (ADR) from those that do not. Task 2, a follow-up to Task 1, asked participants to identify the span of text in tweets reporting ADRs. Task 3 is an end-to-end task where the goal was to first detect tweets mentioning an ADR and then map the extracted colloquial mentions of ADRs in the tweets to their corresponding standard concept IDs in the MedDRA vocabulary. Finally, Task 4 asked participants to classify whether a tweet contains a personal mention of one’s health, a more general discussion of the health issue, or is an unrelated mention. A total of 34 teams from around the world registered and 19 teams from 12 countries submitted a system run. We summarize here the corpora for this challenge which are freely available at https://competitions.codalab.org/competitions/22521, and present an overview of the methods and the results of the competing systems.","PeriodicalId":265570,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Fourth Social Media Mining for Health Applications (#SMM4H) Workshop & Shared Task","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"85","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Fourth Social Media Mining for Health Applications (#SMM4H) Workshop & Shared Task","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-3203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 85

Abstract

The number of users of social media continues to grow, with nearly half of adults worldwide and two-thirds of all American adults using social networking. Advances in automated data processing, machine learning and NLP present the possibility of utilizing this massive data source for biomedical and public health applications, if researchers address the methodological challenges unique to this media. We present the Social Media Mining for Health Shared Tasks collocated with the ACL at Florence in 2019, which address these challenges for health monitoring and surveillance, utilizing state of the art techniques for processing noisy, real-world, and substantially creative language expressions from social media users. For the fourth execution of this challenge, we proposed four different tasks. Task 1 asked participants to distinguish tweets reporting an adverse drug reaction (ADR) from those that do not. Task 2, a follow-up to Task 1, asked participants to identify the span of text in tweets reporting ADRs. Task 3 is an end-to-end task where the goal was to first detect tweets mentioning an ADR and then map the extracted colloquial mentions of ADRs in the tweets to their corresponding standard concept IDs in the MedDRA vocabulary. Finally, Task 4 asked participants to classify whether a tweet contains a personal mention of one’s health, a more general discussion of the health issue, or is an unrelated mention. A total of 34 teams from around the world registered and 19 teams from 12 countries submitted a system run. We summarize here the corpora for this challenge which are freely available at https://competitions.codalab.org/competitions/22521, and present an overview of the methods and the results of the competing systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ACL 2019第四届健康社交媒体挖掘(SMM4H)共享任务概述
社交媒体的用户数量持续增长,全球近一半的成年人和三分之二的美国成年人使用社交网络。自动化数据处理、机器学习和自然语言处理的进步,为生物医学和公共卫生应用提供了利用这一海量数据源的可能性,如果研究人员能够解决这一媒体独有的方法论挑战的话。我们将于2019年在佛罗伦萨展示与ACL相匹配的健康共享任务社交媒体挖掘,该任务利用最先进的技术处理来自社交媒体用户的嘈杂、真实和富有创造性的语言表达,解决了健康监测和监视方面的这些挑战。对于这个挑战的第四次执行,我们提出了四个不同的任务。任务1要求参与者区分报告药物不良反应(ADR)的推文和没有报告的推文。任务2是任务1的后续,要求参与者识别报道adr的推文的文本跨度。任务3是一个端到端任务,其目标是首先检测提到ADR的tweet,然后将tweet中提取的关于ADR的口语化提及映射到MedDRA词汇表中相应的标准概念id。最后,任务4要求参与者对一条推文进行分类,这条推文是对个人健康的提及,还是对健康问题的一般性讨论,还是与健康问题无关的提及。共有来自世界各地的34个团队注册,来自12个国家的19个团队提交了系统运行。我们在这里总结了这个挑战的语料库,这些语料库可以在https://competitions.codalab.org/competitions/22521上免费获得,并概述了竞争系统的方法和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Approaching SMM4H with Merged Models and Multi-task Learning BIGODM System in the Social Media Mining for Health Applications Shared Task 2019 HITSZ-ICRC: A Report for SMM4H Shared Task 2019-Automatic Classification and Extraction of Adverse Effect Mentions in Tweets Lexical Normalization of User-Generated Medical Text Towards Text Processing Pipelines to Identify Adverse Drug Events-related Tweets: University of Michigan @ SMM4H 2019 Task 1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1