Should the UK Pay an EU Divorce Bill?

J. Jessop
{"title":"Should the UK Pay an EU Divorce Bill?","authors":"J. Jessop","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3853061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The UK is leaving the EU and needs to close its accounts. In a divorce, the two sides divide up the assets and liabilities. But the situation here is more like leaving a club, so the question is when the obligation to pay membership fees should end. One option would be simply be for the UK to cease payments at the end of March 2019 (with no bills thereafter). The UK would be on strong legal ground if it decided to do so. Article 50 is clear that, in the absence of any other agreement, EU treaty obligations will cease to apply after that date. However, a more flexible stance could help secure better terms on other aspects of the negotiations, including any transitional arrangements before a comprehensive free trade deal can be concluded. It seems fair that the UK should be asked to make some contribution towards long-term financial commitments undertaken when the UK was a member – even if the money is spent after the UK has left. A sensible cut-off date would be the end of 2020, when the EU’s current multi-year budget process is completed. If the UK continues its planned payments until then, the bill would ocme to around €25 billion, which might be topped up to €30 billion (£26 billion) with a few reasonable extras. However, the EU is demanding a lot more than this, including large contributions to spending likely to take place long after 2020, and upfront payments for contingencies that may never materialise. If the EU is unwilling to compromise, the UK can, and should walk away without paying a penny.<br><br>","PeriodicalId":341166,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Trade Relationships (Topic)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Trade Relationships (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3853061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The UK is leaving the EU and needs to close its accounts. In a divorce, the two sides divide up the assets and liabilities. But the situation here is more like leaving a club, so the question is when the obligation to pay membership fees should end. One option would be simply be for the UK to cease payments at the end of March 2019 (with no bills thereafter). The UK would be on strong legal ground if it decided to do so. Article 50 is clear that, in the absence of any other agreement, EU treaty obligations will cease to apply after that date. However, a more flexible stance could help secure better terms on other aspects of the negotiations, including any transitional arrangements before a comprehensive free trade deal can be concluded. It seems fair that the UK should be asked to make some contribution towards long-term financial commitments undertaken when the UK was a member – even if the money is spent after the UK has left. A sensible cut-off date would be the end of 2020, when the EU’s current multi-year budget process is completed. If the UK continues its planned payments until then, the bill would ocme to around €25 billion, which might be topped up to €30 billion (£26 billion) with a few reasonable extras. However, the EU is demanding a lot more than this, including large contributions to spending likely to take place long after 2020, and upfront payments for contingencies that may never materialise. If the EU is unwilling to compromise, the UK can, and should walk away without paying a penny.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国应该为脱欧埋单吗?
英国即将离开欧盟,需要关闭其账户。离婚时,双方平分财产和债务。但这里的情况更像是离开一个俱乐部,所以问题是支付会费的义务何时结束。一种选择是英国在2019年3月底停止支付(此后没有账单)。如果英国决定这样做,它将有强有力的法律依据。第50条明确规定,在没有其他协议的情况下,欧盟条约义务将在该日期之后停止适用。然而,更灵活的立场可能有助于在谈判的其他方面获得更好的条款,包括在达成全面自由贸易协议之前的任何过渡安排。英国应该被要求为其作为欧盟成员国时所做的长期财务承诺做出一些贡献,这似乎是公平的——即使这笔钱是在英国离开欧盟后花的。一个明智的截止日期是2020年底,届时欧盟当前的多年预算程序将完成。如果英国在此之前继续按计划支付,这笔账单将达到250亿欧元左右,再加上一些合理的额外支出,这笔账单可能会达到300亿欧元(260亿英镑)。然而,欧盟提出的要求远不止于此,包括为可能在2020年之后很久才会发生的支出做出大笔贡献,以及为可能永远不会发生的突发事件预先付款。如果欧盟不愿妥协,英国可以,也应该一分钱不付就离开。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Do International Trade Shocks Propagate Through Domestic Supply Chains? Connecting World Input-Output Tables and Firm-Level Supply Chain Data The Complementarity Between Trust and Contract Enforcement Level Playing Fields and Rebalancing: A Comment Hong Kong’s Intermediary Role on Funding the BRI: How Does it Fare Against Singapore? Diminishing American Power: The US - China Trade War, Sanctions, and Coronavirus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1