“Love your Folk”: The Role of ‘Conspiracy Talk’ in Communicating Nationalism

C. Døving
{"title":"“Love your Folk”: The Role of ‘Conspiracy Talk’ in Communicating Nationalism","authors":"C. Døving","doi":"10.5771/9783748905059-189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"22 July 2011 the right-wing extremist Anders Behring Breivik killed 77 people. It started with a bomb placed outside a government building and continued with a mass killing on the island of Utøya, where the Labour Party’s youth league was holding its summer camp. The perpetrator himself defined the massacre as an act of terrorism based on a specific ideology. The ideological message was conveyed through a manifesto which he published online prior to the killings. In this document, entitled 2083: A European Declaration of Independence, Breivik defined the attack as a legitimate act of self-defense on behalf of the European people. The core message in the document was that in the face of an ongoing Islamization of Europe, the political and social elite have entered into a pact with the enemy. The underlying motive for Breivik’s actions was, he claimed, to be found in the dream of an ethnically and culturally homogenous (pure) society, and in hating those who allow such impurity to develop (politicians, multiculturalists and “cultural Marxists”). Breivik’s ideas are in many ways the quintessence of a merge between conspiracy ideas, ethno-nationalism and racism. The overlap between notions about conspiracy, nationalism and racism is typical also for the themes and forms of communication found in online milieus of the far right. In the comment boxes of alternative news sites and on Facebook, people share variants of narratives about Europe going to wrack and ruin, but also of a rescue mission based on ethnic nationalism. Norway’s media landscape is seeing an increase in right-wing populist – sometimes extremist – alternative news sources and organized Facebook communities (Bjørgo 2018). This chapter is based on an analysis of the patterns of communication in open Facebook groups in the landscape of the 1","PeriodicalId":309173,"journal":{"name":"Religion and Neo-Nationalism in Europe","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion and Neo-Nationalism in Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748905059-189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

22 July 2011 the right-wing extremist Anders Behring Breivik killed 77 people. It started with a bomb placed outside a government building and continued with a mass killing on the island of Utøya, where the Labour Party’s youth league was holding its summer camp. The perpetrator himself defined the massacre as an act of terrorism based on a specific ideology. The ideological message was conveyed through a manifesto which he published online prior to the killings. In this document, entitled 2083: A European Declaration of Independence, Breivik defined the attack as a legitimate act of self-defense on behalf of the European people. The core message in the document was that in the face of an ongoing Islamization of Europe, the political and social elite have entered into a pact with the enemy. The underlying motive for Breivik’s actions was, he claimed, to be found in the dream of an ethnically and culturally homogenous (pure) society, and in hating those who allow such impurity to develop (politicians, multiculturalists and “cultural Marxists”). Breivik’s ideas are in many ways the quintessence of a merge between conspiracy ideas, ethno-nationalism and racism. The overlap between notions about conspiracy, nationalism and racism is typical also for the themes and forms of communication found in online milieus of the far right. In the comment boxes of alternative news sites and on Facebook, people share variants of narratives about Europe going to wrack and ruin, but also of a rescue mission based on ethnic nationalism. Norway’s media landscape is seeing an increase in right-wing populist – sometimes extremist – alternative news sources and organized Facebook communities (Bjørgo 2018). This chapter is based on an analysis of the patterns of communication in open Facebook groups in the landscape of the 1
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“爱你的民族”:“阴谋论”在民族主义传播中的作用
2011年7月22日,右翼极端分子安德斯·贝林·布雷维克杀害77人。先是在政府大楼外放置了一枚炸弹,接着在工党青年联盟举行夏令营的Utøya岛上发生了大规模屠杀。行凶者自己将大屠杀定义为基于特定意识形态的恐怖主义行为。这一意识形态信息是通过他在杀戮前在网上发布的宣言传达的。在这份名为《2083:欧洲独立宣言》的文件中,布雷维克将这次袭击定义为代表欧洲人民的合法自卫行为。该文件的核心信息是,面对欧洲正在进行的伊斯兰化,政治和社会精英已经与敌人达成了协议。他声称,布雷维克行为的潜在动机是在一个种族和文化同质(纯粹)社会的梦想中找到的,并憎恨那些允许这种不纯洁发展的人(政治家,多元文化主义者和“文化马克思主义者”)。布雷维克的思想在很多方面都是阴谋思想、民族民族主义和种族主义融合的精髓。阴谋论、民族主义和种族主义等概念之间的重叠,也是极右翼网络环境中常见的主题和交流形式。在其他新闻网站和Facebook的评论框里,人们分享着关于欧洲即将崩溃和毁灭的各种说法,但也有关于基于种族民族主义的救援任务的说法。挪威的媒体领域正在看到右翼民粹主义(有时是极端主义)另类新闻来源和有组织的Facebook社区的增加(Bjørgo 2018)。本章是基于对开放Facebook群组在景观1中的交流模式的分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nationalism and the Political Theology of Populism: Affect and Rationality in Contemporary Identity Politics “Love your Folk”: The Role of ‘Conspiracy Talk’ in Communicating Nationalism Religious Neo-Nationalism in Hungary Religious Nationalism in the Western Balkans Neo-Nationalism and Religion in France
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1