Building the past, forgetting the future: Is Poland a historical knowledge based society?

R. Poczykowski
{"title":"Building the past, forgetting the future: Is Poland a historical knowledge based society?","authors":"R. Poczykowski","doi":"10.3846/2029-0187.2008.1.22-31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article attempts to analyze the public debate in a present day Poland focused on the country's recent history and memory (or memories). The author believes that among other lines dividing Polish society, the cultural line separating opposing “communities of memory” is of special importance. The political and public life of the country is facing a paradox: the media and several political leaders view the past as the last potential platform for a national unity and a source of commonly shared values and ideas. They treat the past as the support for gaining publicity and political capital. But this past orientation causes further division and conflict since, instead of a single past, participants in the public discourse view several competing pasts. The author proposes two ideal types of historical narratives in Poland: national and civic. Turning points, the pantheon of heroes, and modes of narration are sometimes mirror images of one another. Since recently the “national” paradigm is prevalent the author believes that the new European identity (or plurality of collective identities) of Poland can be successfully built only on a civic, not a national, platform of historical narrative.","PeriodicalId":256919,"journal":{"name":"LIMES: Cultural Regionalistics","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LIMES: Cultural Regionalistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/2029-0187.2008.1.22-31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The article attempts to analyze the public debate in a present day Poland focused on the country's recent history and memory (or memories). The author believes that among other lines dividing Polish society, the cultural line separating opposing “communities of memory” is of special importance. The political and public life of the country is facing a paradox: the media and several political leaders view the past as the last potential platform for a national unity and a source of commonly shared values and ideas. They treat the past as the support for gaining publicity and political capital. But this past orientation causes further division and conflict since, instead of a single past, participants in the public discourse view several competing pasts. The author proposes two ideal types of historical narratives in Poland: national and civic. Turning points, the pantheon of heroes, and modes of narration are sometimes mirror images of one another. Since recently the “national” paradigm is prevalent the author believes that the new European identity (or plurality of collective identities) of Poland can be successfully built only on a civic, not a national, platform of historical narrative.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建设过去,忘记未来:波兰是一个以历史知识为基础的社会吗?
这篇文章试图分析当今波兰围绕国家近代史和记忆(或记忆)的公共辩论。作者认为,在划分波兰社会的其他界线中,区分对立的“记忆共同体”的文化界线具有特别重要的意义。该国的政治和公共生活正面临一个悖论:媒体和一些政治领导人将过去视为民族团结的最后一个潜在平台和共同价值观和思想的来源。他们把过去当作获得宣传和政治资本的支持。但是,这种过去取向导致了进一步的分裂和冲突,因为公共话语的参与者看到的不是单一的过去,而是几个相互竞争的过去。作者提出波兰两种理想的历史叙事类型:国家叙事和公民叙事。转折点、英雄神殿和叙事模式有时是彼此的镜像。由于最近“国家”范式盛行,作者认为波兰的新欧洲认同(或集体认同的多元性)只能成功地建立在公民而非国家的历史叙事平台上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cultural territorialization: The case of Grand Duchy of Lithuania System transformation in central and Eastern Europe, economic development and subjective well‐being Interpersonal communication value in globalizing community Art and civil society: From protest to cooperation Sovereignty of a nation in the parliamentary system of Lithuania: Problems and proposals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1