Building Energy Retrofit Hurdle Rates and Risk Arbitrage in Energy Efficiency Investments

Yuan Lai, Sokratis Papadopoulos, F. Fuerst, G. Pivo, Jacob S. Sagi, Constantine E. Kontokosta
{"title":"Building Energy Retrofit Hurdle Rates and Risk Arbitrage in Energy Efficiency Investments","authors":"Yuan Lai, Sokratis Papadopoulos, F. Fuerst, G. Pivo, Jacob S. Sagi, Constantine E. Kontokosta","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3674539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite extensive empirical evidence of the economic and financial benefits of green buildings, energy retrofit investments in existing buildings have not reached widespread adoption.This paper empirically estimate returns to energy retrofit investments for multifamily and commercial buildings in New York City, using a novel database of actual audit report recommendations and permitted renovation work extracted using natural language processing. By modeling the estimated rate of return for energy retrofit investments, we generate a more comprehensive understanding of the perceived risk of these investments and the market and regulatory mechanisms that can overcome financial and informational barriers to investment in energy conservation measures (ECMs). Based on auditor costs and savings estimates, the median internal rate of return (IRR) for adopted ECMs is found to be 21% for multifamily buildings and 25% for office properties. Adoption rates are higher for office buildings than multifamily, and in both cases adopter buildings tend to be larger, higher value, and less efficient at the time of implementation. The economically significant magnitudes of returns to adopted ECMs raise important questions about why many property owners choose not to adopt. As such, we discuss incentive and regulatory mechanisms that can overcome financial and informational barriers to the adoption of energy efficiency measures.","PeriodicalId":316250,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Social Economics (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Social Economics (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3674539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite extensive empirical evidence of the economic and financial benefits of green buildings, energy retrofit investments in existing buildings have not reached widespread adoption.This paper empirically estimate returns to energy retrofit investments for multifamily and commercial buildings in New York City, using a novel database of actual audit report recommendations and permitted renovation work extracted using natural language processing. By modeling the estimated rate of return for energy retrofit investments, we generate a more comprehensive understanding of the perceived risk of these investments and the market and regulatory mechanisms that can overcome financial and informational barriers to investment in energy conservation measures (ECMs). Based on auditor costs and savings estimates, the median internal rate of return (IRR) for adopted ECMs is found to be 21% for multifamily buildings and 25% for office properties. Adoption rates are higher for office buildings than multifamily, and in both cases adopter buildings tend to be larger, higher value, and less efficient at the time of implementation. The economically significant magnitudes of returns to adopted ECMs raise important questions about why many property owners choose not to adopt. As such, we discuss incentive and regulatory mechanisms that can overcome financial and informational barriers to the adoption of energy efficiency measures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
节能投资中的建筑节能改造门槛率和风险套利
尽管有大量的经验证据表明绿色建筑的经济和财政效益,但对现有建筑的能源改造投资尚未得到广泛采用。本文使用一个新颖的数据库,使用自然语言处理提取的实际审计报告建议和允许的翻新工作,对纽约市多户住宅和商业建筑的能源改造投资回报进行了实证估计。通过对能源改造投资的估计回报率进行建模,我们对这些投资的感知风险以及能够克服节能措施投资的财务和信息障碍的市场和监管机制有了更全面的了解。根据审计师的成本和节约估算,采用ecm的内部收益率(IRR)中位数在多户建筑中为21%,在办公物业中为25%。办公楼的采用率比多户住宅高,在这两种情况下,采用率往往更大,价值更高,但在实现时效率更低。采用ecm的巨大经济回报提出了一个重要问题:为什么许多业主选择不采用ecm ?因此,我们将讨论激励和监管机制,以克服采用能效措施的财务和信息障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Consumer Preference for Car Sharing and the Role of Car Plate Lottery Policy: A Stated Preference Experiment in Beijing Interpersonal Comparisons of What? The Role of Informal Housing in Lowering China’s Urbanization Costs Social Finance Politics of Cultural Commons: A Case Study of Sacred Groves in Central Kerala
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1