Break on Through: An Analysis of Computer Damage Cases

Ioana Vasiu, Lucian Vasiu
{"title":"Break on Through: An Analysis of Computer Damage Cases","authors":"Ioana Vasiu, Lucian Vasiu","doi":"10.5195/TLP.2014.139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"14 Pittsburgh Journal of Technology Law & Policy 158 (2014). This article is an extensive inquiry into computer damage cases based on the comprehensive study of over three hundred cases brought to courts in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(5). Based on an empirical categorization of the essential aspects of computer damage cases, the article analyzes the most relevant issues, interpretations, and arguments available for each computer damage category. These categories include fundamental facets, such as legal elements; motive and intent; results; profile of perpetrators; and means of perpetration, including, if applicable, the software involved.Part I concerns theoretical aspects and discusses the legal elements of computer damage offenses under the CFAA. Part II considers the practical aspects and discusses the essential features involved in the perpetration of these offenses and the profile of attackers. Finally, Part III provides a summary of findings and the implications of this study for stakeholders.This article makes two important contributions: a comprehensive analysis and a conceptual approach for this area. The findings will improve the investigation, prosecution and litigation of such cases in courts, help organizations in their process of identification and mitigation of risks, and stimulate more research in this area. Finally, although this article focused exclusively on one jurisdiction, the findings can be of interest to a wider, global context.","PeriodicalId":170628,"journal":{"name":"Pittsburgh Journal of Technology Law and Policy","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pittsburgh Journal of Technology Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/TLP.2014.139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

14 Pittsburgh Journal of Technology Law & Policy 158 (2014). This article is an extensive inquiry into computer damage cases based on the comprehensive study of over three hundred cases brought to courts in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(5). Based on an empirical categorization of the essential aspects of computer damage cases, the article analyzes the most relevant issues, interpretations, and arguments available for each computer damage category. These categories include fundamental facets, such as legal elements; motive and intent; results; profile of perpetrators; and means of perpetration, including, if applicable, the software involved.Part I concerns theoretical aspects and discusses the legal elements of computer damage offenses under the CFAA. Part II considers the practical aspects and discusses the essential features involved in the perpetration of these offenses and the profile of attackers. Finally, Part III provides a summary of findings and the implications of this study for stakeholders.This article makes two important contributions: a comprehensive analysis and a conceptual approach for this area. The findings will improve the investigation, prosecution and litigation of such cases in courts, help organizations in their process of identification and mitigation of risks, and stimulate more research in this area. Finally, although this article focused exclusively on one jurisdiction, the findings can be of interest to a wider, global context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
突破突破:计算机损害案例分析
[14]《法律与政策》(2014)。本文是基于对违反18 U.S.C.§1030(a)(5)向法院提起的300多起案件的综合研究,对计算机损害案件进行的广泛调查。基于对计算机损害案例的基本方面的经验分类,本文分析了每个计算机损害类别中最相关的问题、解释和论据。这些类别包括基本方面,例如法律因素;动机和意图;结果;犯罪者的侧写;以及犯罪手段,如适用,包括所涉及的软件。第一部分从理论方面论述了《中华人民共和国计算机侵权法》下计算机损害罪的法律要件。第二部分考虑了实践方面,并讨论了这些犯罪行为的基本特征和攻击者的概况。最后,第三部分提供了研究结果的总结和本研究对利益相关者的影响。本文对这一领域进行了全面的分析,并提出了概念性的方法。调查结果将改善法院对这类案件的调查、起诉和诉讼,帮助各组织查明和减轻风险,并促进在这一领域开展更多研究。最后,尽管本文只关注一个司法管辖区,但研究结果可能对更广泛的全球背景感兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Understanding the Promises and Pitfalls of Outer Space Mining and the Need for an International Regulatory Body to Govern the Extraction of Space-Based Resources Missing Links: The First Amendment's Place in an Ever-Changing Web Improving the Transparency of the Pharmaceutical Supply Chain through the Adoption of Quick Response (QR) Code, Internet of Things (IoT), and Blockchain Technology: One Result: Ending the Opioid Crisis Break on Through: An Analysis of Computer Damage Cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1