Performance vs. security: Implementing an immutable database in MySQL

Thomas Nash, Aspen Olmsted
{"title":"Performance vs. security: Implementing an immutable database in MySQL","authors":"Thomas Nash, Aspen Olmsted","doi":"10.23919/ICITST.2017.8356402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Maintaining transactional history is crucial to unraveling the changes any unauthorized user makes to a system, and this logging database is often a prime target for attackers. One common approach to maintaining this security is through an immutable database. There are many ways to implement such a database which maintains appropriate security requirements, each ranging in the complexity and effort required to configure. What remains constant amongst all the methods is that the database is available only to a restricted, defined set of users and that records may only be inserted and not updated or deleted to maintain a proper history. We demonstrate two of these methods in the MySQL database system and compare performance and capabilities amongst them.","PeriodicalId":440665,"journal":{"name":"2017 12th International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions (ICITST)","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 12th International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions (ICITST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/ICITST.2017.8356402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Maintaining transactional history is crucial to unraveling the changes any unauthorized user makes to a system, and this logging database is often a prime target for attackers. One common approach to maintaining this security is through an immutable database. There are many ways to implement such a database which maintains appropriate security requirements, each ranging in the complexity and effort required to configure. What remains constant amongst all the methods is that the database is available only to a restricted, defined set of users and that records may only be inserted and not updated or deleted to maintain a proper history. We demonstrate two of these methods in the MySQL database system and compare performance and capabilities amongst them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性能vs.安全性:在MySQL中实现不可变数据库
维护事务历史记录对于揭示任何未经授权的用户对系统所做的更改至关重要,并且此日志数据库通常是攻击者的主要目标。维护这种安全性的一种常用方法是通过不可变数据库。有许多方法可以实现这样一个维护适当安全性需求的数据库,每种方法的复杂性和配置所需的工作量各不相同。在所有方法中保持不变的是,数据库仅对一组受限制的、已定义的用户可用,并且只能插入记录,不能更新或删除记录以维护适当的历史记录。我们在MySQL数据库系统中演示了其中的两种方法,并比较了它们之间的性能和功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the cost of cyber security in smart business Towards comparing programming paradigms Towards a security baseline for IaaS-cloud back-ends in Industry 4.0 Enhancing security in the cloud: When traceability meets access control New keyed chaotic neural network hash function based on sponge construction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1