{"title":"TURKEY’S POLITICAL STEPS AGAINST SYRIA CRISIS:\nDECISION ANALYSIS OVER A CASE STUDY","authors":"Orhan Irk","doi":"10.30546/2616-4418.bitd.2021.192.","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, the polyheuristic decision-making model is applied to a sample case and it is aimed to\nanalyze how and why political leaders make decisions during a crisis. Analyzing all aspects of a decision\nmade during a crisis is important in understanding how effective the solutions are. It is expected that an\nanalysis of crisis and an investigation of the process from a wider perspective will be useful for better\nunderstanding of the Turkey’s reactions during the crisis when its RF-4E “Phantom” type air craft has\nbeen shot down in 2012. The reason of choosing this case study is the results of decisions taken duruing\nthe crisis for Turkish foreign policy in the following periods. The article consists of the introduction\npart about the general overview of Turkish-Syrian relations, a part explaining the decision-making\nprocesses and decisions of political leaders as well as the polyheuristic decision-making model, a part\nwith implementation of the model to the choosen case and a conclusion part. During the crisis Turkey\nhas made decision to use military force by changing the rules of engagement and creating the positive\nperception in the international community. However, it was not contented with the decision to use\nmilitary force alone. Turkey did not wait for the spontaneous reaction of the international community.\nTurkey has mobilized international forces like NATO. This means that two different decisions are made\nsequentially and quickly. Turkish political leaders have implemented the decisions in turn that had been\nchoosen among the alternatives. It is expected that the study would contribute to the fi eld, improving\nresearches on the decision-making processes with more comprehensive discussions in the future.\nKeywords: Syrian Crisis, Political Leadership, Polyheuristic Model.","PeriodicalId":355365,"journal":{"name":"“Küresel siyaset: Türkiye’den bakış”","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"“Küresel siyaset: Türkiye’den bakış”","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30546/2616-4418.bitd.2021.192.","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this study, the polyheuristic decision-making model is applied to a sample case and it is aimed to
analyze how and why political leaders make decisions during a crisis. Analyzing all aspects of a decision
made during a crisis is important in understanding how effective the solutions are. It is expected that an
analysis of crisis and an investigation of the process from a wider perspective will be useful for better
understanding of the Turkey’s reactions during the crisis when its RF-4E “Phantom” type air craft has
been shot down in 2012. The reason of choosing this case study is the results of decisions taken duruing
the crisis for Turkish foreign policy in the following periods. The article consists of the introduction
part about the general overview of Turkish-Syrian relations, a part explaining the decision-making
processes and decisions of political leaders as well as the polyheuristic decision-making model, a part
with implementation of the model to the choosen case and a conclusion part. During the crisis Turkey
has made decision to use military force by changing the rules of engagement and creating the positive
perception in the international community. However, it was not contented with the decision to use
military force alone. Turkey did not wait for the spontaneous reaction of the international community.
Turkey has mobilized international forces like NATO. This means that two different decisions are made
sequentially and quickly. Turkish political leaders have implemented the decisions in turn that had been
choosen among the alternatives. It is expected that the study would contribute to the fi eld, improving
researches on the decision-making processes with more comprehensive discussions in the future.
Keywords: Syrian Crisis, Political Leadership, Polyheuristic Model.