The simulated tutorial. Method for assessing medical school applicants.

British journal of medical education Pub Date : 1975-09-01
D L Mitchell, W Pallie, R G McAuley
{"title":"The simulated tutorial. Method for assessing medical school applicants.","authors":"D L Mitchell,&nbsp;W Pallie,&nbsp;R G McAuley","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The simulated tutorial is a method for selecting medical students by their performance in a small problem-solving group, currently being tested at McMaster University. Four hundred and thirty-two applicants were randomly allocated to groups consisting of 5 or 6 members, assigned a group leader, and asked to work through two unstructured problem situations in a 50-minute session. Assessors, seated behind a one-way mirror, evaluated applicants according to their abilities to relate to their peers, to function in the group, and to define issues in the problem situations. Feedback from the assessors and applicants suggests that the simulated tutorial is potentially useful as a selection tool. All assessors thought they were able to evaluate the 5 or 6 applicants in the group in the time provided. Nearly 80% of the applicants who anonymously returned questionnaires felt they were able to express themselves during their simulated tutorial. The data also suggest that applicants with experience in small groups and applicants previously rated as having outstanding 'personal qualities' are given higher ratings than other applicants. A validation study of the simulated tutorial, comparing individual's scores with evaluations of performance in tutorial groups in the undergraduate M.D. programme, is currently in progress.</p>","PeriodicalId":75619,"journal":{"name":"British journal of medical education","volume":"9 3","pages":"133-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1975-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The simulated tutorial is a method for selecting medical students by their performance in a small problem-solving group, currently being tested at McMaster University. Four hundred and thirty-two applicants were randomly allocated to groups consisting of 5 or 6 members, assigned a group leader, and asked to work through two unstructured problem situations in a 50-minute session. Assessors, seated behind a one-way mirror, evaluated applicants according to their abilities to relate to their peers, to function in the group, and to define issues in the problem situations. Feedback from the assessors and applicants suggests that the simulated tutorial is potentially useful as a selection tool. All assessors thought they were able to evaluate the 5 or 6 applicants in the group in the time provided. Nearly 80% of the applicants who anonymously returned questionnaires felt they were able to express themselves during their simulated tutorial. The data also suggest that applicants with experience in small groups and applicants previously rated as having outstanding 'personal qualities' are given higher ratings than other applicants. A validation study of the simulated tutorial, comparing individual's scores with evaluations of performance in tutorial groups in the undergraduate M.D. programme, is currently in progress.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟教程。医学院申请者评估方法。
这种模拟辅导课是一种根据医学生在一个解决问题的小组中的表现来挑选医学生的方法,目前正在麦克马斯特大学进行测试。432名申请者被随机分配到5人或6人的小组,并被指派一名组长,并被要求在50分钟的时间内解决两个非结构化的问题。评估员坐在一面单向镜后面,根据申请人与同伴相处的能力、在小组中发挥作用的能力以及在问题情况下确定问题的能力来评估申请人。从评估人员和申请人的反馈表明,模拟教程是潜在的有用的选择工具。所有的评估人员都认为他们能够在规定的时间内评估小组中的5或6名申请人。在匿名回复问卷的申请者中,近80%的人认为他们能够在模拟教程中表达自己。数据还表明,有小组经验的申请人和之前被评为“个人品质”突出的申请人会比其他申请人得到更高的评分。目前正在进行一项模拟辅导课的验证研究,将个人分数与本科医学博士课程中辅导课小组的表现评估进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Education in occupational medicine. The retiring editor: Dr John Ellis. Recall and retrieval of anatomical knowledge. Editorial: The pursuit of quality. Textbooks -- a new approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1