Approaches of chosen air navigation services providers to UAV integration into air traffic control systems

Peter Matúš, Matúš Materna
{"title":"Approaches of chosen air navigation services providers to UAV integration into air traffic control systems","authors":"Peter Matúš, Matúš Materna","doi":"10.26552/pas.z.2021.2.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article are approaches of Air Navigation Services (ANS) providers in chosen countries to UAV integration into Air Traffic Control Systems identified and described. Firstly we made a synpaper of theoretical information about ANS and UAV. Product of ANS providers has 11 parts. For UAV traffic control and management are important ATC, CNS, AIS, MET, ATFCM and ASM services. The volume of ANS provided depends on UAV operation development in the country, and on the level of integration of UAV into ATC systems. The biggest problem of UAV operation is the risk of collision with piloted aircraft, and potential threat of people and property on the ground. The biggest risk is during UAV operation close to airports, because there are many aircrafts flying in low altitudes (after take-off and on approach to landing). The consequences of collision in this altitudes in the most serious. Because of this, 4 ways to detect and 2 ways to mitigate an unauthorized UAV close to airport are currently in use. Various combinations of UAV detection and mitigation ways create complex airport UAV protection systems. Secondly, we chose 7 countries (Poland, Hungary, Germany, Great Britain, USA, India, and United Arab Emirates), and analysed their approaches to UAV integration. In all of the analysed countries can remote pilots use a mobile application, which allows them to create a flight plan, and receive all the information, necessary for the flight. Differences between these countries are for example if the permission in required for every UAV flight (in Hungary and India yes), if the ANS provider has an opportunity to watch UAV during flight (in Poland, India, and partly in Germany), if the UAV operation without direct visual contact between remote pilot and UAV is allowed (in Poland and Germany), and if are UAV operations included into airspace capacity management systems (in Poland, Hungary, Germany, and Great Britain). UAV integration process in next years will relate to development of communication systems between UAVs, between UAV and ATC, and between UAV and piloted aircraft. The process will also relate to development of technologies to avoid mid-air collisions.","PeriodicalId":142690,"journal":{"name":"Práce a štúdie - Vydanie 10","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Práce a štúdie - Vydanie 10","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26552/pas.z.2021.2.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article are approaches of Air Navigation Services (ANS) providers in chosen countries to UAV integration into Air Traffic Control Systems identified and described. Firstly we made a synpaper of theoretical information about ANS and UAV. Product of ANS providers has 11 parts. For UAV traffic control and management are important ATC, CNS, AIS, MET, ATFCM and ASM services. The volume of ANS provided depends on UAV operation development in the country, and on the level of integration of UAV into ATC systems. The biggest problem of UAV operation is the risk of collision with piloted aircraft, and potential threat of people and property on the ground. The biggest risk is during UAV operation close to airports, because there are many aircrafts flying in low altitudes (after take-off and on approach to landing). The consequences of collision in this altitudes in the most serious. Because of this, 4 ways to detect and 2 ways to mitigate an unauthorized UAV close to airport are currently in use. Various combinations of UAV detection and mitigation ways create complex airport UAV protection systems. Secondly, we chose 7 countries (Poland, Hungary, Germany, Great Britain, USA, India, and United Arab Emirates), and analysed their approaches to UAV integration. In all of the analysed countries can remote pilots use a mobile application, which allows them to create a flight plan, and receive all the information, necessary for the flight. Differences between these countries are for example if the permission in required for every UAV flight (in Hungary and India yes), if the ANS provider has an opportunity to watch UAV during flight (in Poland, India, and partly in Germany), if the UAV operation without direct visual contact between remote pilot and UAV is allowed (in Poland and Germany), and if are UAV operations included into airspace capacity management systems (in Poland, Hungary, Germany, and Great Britain). UAV integration process in next years will relate to development of communication systems between UAVs, between UAV and ATC, and between UAV and piloted aircraft. The process will also relate to development of technologies to avoid mid-air collisions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选定的空中导航服务提供商将无人机集成到空中交通管制系统的方法
在本文中,选定国家的空中导航服务(ANS)提供商确定并描述了将无人机集成到空中交通管制系统中的方法。首先对无人驾驶飞机和无人驾驶飞机的理论信息进行了综合分析。ANS供应商的产品有11个部分。对于无人机来说,交通管制和管理是重要的ATC、CNS、AIS、MET、ATFCM和ASM服务。提供的无人值机系统的数量取决于该国无人机的操作发展情况,以及无人机与空中交通管制系统的集成水平。无人机操作的最大问题是与有人驾驶飞机发生碰撞的风险,以及对地面人员和财产的潜在威胁。最大的风险是在机场附近的无人机操作期间,因为有许多飞机在低空飞行(起飞后和接近着陆时)。在这个高度发生碰撞的后果最为严重。正因为如此,目前有4种检测方法和2种缓解未经授权的无人机靠近机场的方法正在使用。无人机探测和缓解方式的各种组合创造了复杂的机场无人机保护系统。其次,选取波兰、匈牙利、德国、英国、美国、印度、阿联酋等7个国家,分析其无人机集成途径。在所有被分析的国家中,远程飞行员都可以使用移动应用程序,该应用程序允许他们创建飞行计划,并接收飞行所需的所有信息。这些国家之间的差异是,例如,每次无人机飞行是否需要许可(在匈牙利和印度是),ANS提供商是否有机会在飞行过程中观看无人机(在波兰、印度和部分在德国),无人机操作是否允许远程飞行员和无人机之间没有直接视觉接触(在波兰和德国),以及无人机操作是否被纳入空域容量管理系统(在波兰、匈牙利、德国和英国)。未来几年的无人机集成过程将涉及无人机之间、无人机与ATC之间以及无人机与有人驾驶飞机之间通信系统的发展。这个过程还将涉及到避免空中碰撞的技术发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of aircraft coating resistance to lighting strikes Electronization of a modern flight school Comparison of fog occurrence at Slovak international airports for the period 1998-2018 Design of a bladeless engine compressor based on magnetohydrodynamics Design and construction of a UAV device with a fixed wing for the conditions of rescue services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1