Effectiveness of cognitive digressions in classes of general technical disciplines in institutions of higher education of agro-technical direction

S. Yermakov, Taras Hutsol, V. Devin, Serhiy Oleksiyko, Pavlo Potapskyi
{"title":"Effectiveness of cognitive digressions in classes of general technical disciplines in institutions of higher education of agro-technical direction","authors":"S. Yermakov, Taras Hutsol, V. Devin, Serhiy Oleksiyko, Pavlo Potapskyi","doi":"10.22616/erdev.2022.21.tf154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the results of pedagogical research on the impact of the inclusion of cognitive information in educational classes in the study of general technical disciplines on the example of teaching technical mechanics at the College of Agricultural Engineering. The main purpose of the work is to study the impact of involvement in the explanation of cognitive information on the effectiveness of theoretical classes and the quality of knowledge acquisition by students. The study was conducted in the educational process of studying the discipline Technical Mechanics in parallel groups. Before the research in the control and experimental groups, the level of residual knowledge on previous topics of the course and partly on related disciplines was measured. Methodological materials were developed for the experimental group with the inclusion of cognitive information, which to some extent relates to the topics studied. Whereas in the control group teaching took place in strict accordance with traditional teaching materials. As a result of the study it was found that the involvement of cognitive digressions in technical mechanics increased the overall activity of perception and assimilation of educational material, which is expressed in better improvement of both qualitative and quantitative results in the final test in the experimental group compared to control. The results of the study showed that in the groups in which “interesting” explanations were used compared to the initial data of the level of residual knowledge, the efficiency of learning increased by 96.4%, while in the control group this figure was only 25.6%. Thus, the study confirmed the hypothesis that the cognitive presentation of technical sciences may contribute to a more attentive mastery of the subject and, consequently, better learning of the material.","PeriodicalId":244107,"journal":{"name":"21st International Scientific Conference Engineering for Rural Development Proceedings","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"21st International Scientific Conference Engineering for Rural Development Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22616/erdev.2022.21.tf154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The article presents the results of pedagogical research on the impact of the inclusion of cognitive information in educational classes in the study of general technical disciplines on the example of teaching technical mechanics at the College of Agricultural Engineering. The main purpose of the work is to study the impact of involvement in the explanation of cognitive information on the effectiveness of theoretical classes and the quality of knowledge acquisition by students. The study was conducted in the educational process of studying the discipline Technical Mechanics in parallel groups. Before the research in the control and experimental groups, the level of residual knowledge on previous topics of the course and partly on related disciplines was measured. Methodological materials were developed for the experimental group with the inclusion of cognitive information, which to some extent relates to the topics studied. Whereas in the control group teaching took place in strict accordance with traditional teaching materials. As a result of the study it was found that the involvement of cognitive digressions in technical mechanics increased the overall activity of perception and assimilation of educational material, which is expressed in better improvement of both qualitative and quantitative results in the final test in the experimental group compared to control. The results of the study showed that in the groups in which “interesting” explanations were used compared to the initial data of the level of residual knowledge, the efficiency of learning increased by 96.4%, while in the control group this figure was only 25.6%. Thus, the study confirmed the hypothesis that the cognitive presentation of technical sciences may contribute to a more attentive mastery of the subject and, consequently, better learning of the material.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农业技术方向高等学校普通技术学科课堂认知偏离的有效性
本文以农业工程学院技术力学教学为例,对普通技术学科教学课堂中认知信息纳入的影响进行了教学研究。本研究的主要目的是研究参与认知信息解释对理论课效果和学生知识获取质量的影响。本研究是在平行分组学习技术力学的教学过程中进行的。在对照组和实验组的研究之前,测量了对课程先前主题和部分相关学科的剩余知识水平。为实验组开发了方法学材料,包括认知信息,这在一定程度上与所研究的主题相关。而对照组则严格按照传统教材进行教学。研究发现,技术力学中认知离题的参与提高了学生对教育材料的整体感知和同化活动,表现为实验组在最终测试中的定性和定量结果都比对照组有更好的提高。研究结果表明,在使用“有趣”解释的小组中,与剩余知识水平的初始数据相比,学习效率提高了96.4%,而对照组的这一数字仅为25.6%。因此,该研究证实了这样一个假设,即技术科学的认知呈现可能有助于更专注地掌握该学科,从而更好地学习材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Possibilities for improvement of plant nutrient management in biogas plants in Latvia Types of CO2 emission reduction technologies and future development trends Anaerobic fermentation of kitchen waste Influence of oxygen content in medium carbon steel on bending fatigue strength Finite element analysis of stainless steel AISI 420 cutting process to predict cutting forces and temperature distribution in duratomic-coated cutting tool
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1