Care coordination for children with medical complexity and caregiver empowerment in the process: A literature review

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing Pub Date : 2022-06-07 DOI:10.1111/jspn.12387
Julie Van Orne MSN, RN, CPN, CNL
{"title":"Care coordination for children with medical complexity and caregiver empowerment in the process: A literature review","authors":"Julie Van Orne MSN, RN, CPN, CNL","doi":"10.1111/jspn.12387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Advances in health care have led to an increase in infants and children being discharged home with increasingly complex conditions. Children with medical complexity require care from many physicians and specialties to thrive in their home environment. While some care coordination programs are in place, these programs are often dependent upon the child living within the geographic area of a major healthcare system. Additionally, children with medical complexity often need specialized care from providers outside the participating healthcare system, placing the onus of care coordination on the child's family. This literature review aimed to examine care coordination programs for children with medical complexity and what tools have been created to empower the child's family in the process.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Qualitative and quantitative research studies published from 2015 to 2021 found in Academic Search Complete, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Medline that included a review of a care coordination program for children with medical complexity were included. Nonresearch articles, articles written about adults, or written in languages other than English were excluded. The Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice grading scale was used to appraise the evidence. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist was utilized to structure this review to deter the risk of bias. A qualitative synthesis was used to analyze and present the results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>There are varying strategies used to facilitate care coordination of children with medical complexity. Effects of care coordination on the child are inconsistent; however, the child's caregiver considers high-quality care coordination to improve quality of life. There are limited tools available for caregivers of children with medical complexity to coordinate their child's care across healthcare systems. Generalizability is a concern due to the small sample sizes of studies and underrepresentation of non-English speaking families in the research. Risk of bias is possible due to highly engaged families willing to participate in the selected research studies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Practice Implications</h3>\n \n <p>There is an opportunity to develop further and study care coordination tools to empower the caregivers of children with medical complexity.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54900,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jspn.12387","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose

Advances in health care have led to an increase in infants and children being discharged home with increasingly complex conditions. Children with medical complexity require care from many physicians and specialties to thrive in their home environment. While some care coordination programs are in place, these programs are often dependent upon the child living within the geographic area of a major healthcare system. Additionally, children with medical complexity often need specialized care from providers outside the participating healthcare system, placing the onus of care coordination on the child's family. This literature review aimed to examine care coordination programs for children with medical complexity and what tools have been created to empower the child's family in the process.

Method

Qualitative and quantitative research studies published from 2015 to 2021 found in Academic Search Complete, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Medline that included a review of a care coordination program for children with medical complexity were included. Nonresearch articles, articles written about adults, or written in languages other than English were excluded. The Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice grading scale was used to appraise the evidence. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist was utilized to structure this review to deter the risk of bias. A qualitative synthesis was used to analyze and present the results.

Conclusions

There are varying strategies used to facilitate care coordination of children with medical complexity. Effects of care coordination on the child are inconsistent; however, the child's caregiver considers high-quality care coordination to improve quality of life. There are limited tools available for caregivers of children with medical complexity to coordinate their child's care across healthcare systems. Generalizability is a concern due to the small sample sizes of studies and underrepresentation of non-English speaking families in the research. Risk of bias is possible due to highly engaged families willing to participate in the selected research studies.

Practice Implications

There is an opportunity to develop further and study care coordination tools to empower the caregivers of children with medical complexity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理协调儿童的医疗复杂性和护理人员授权的过程:文献综述
目的保健方面的进步导致越来越多的婴儿和儿童出院回家,病情日益复杂。患有复杂疾病的儿童需要许多医生和专业人士的照顾,才能在家庭环境中茁壮成长。虽然有一些护理协调计划,但这些计划往往取决于居住在主要医疗保健系统地理区域内的儿童。此外,患有复杂医疗问题的儿童通常需要参与医疗保健系统之外的提供者的专门护理,将护理协调的责任放在儿童家庭身上。本文献综述旨在检查医疗复杂性儿童的护理协调方案,以及在此过程中创造了哪些工具来赋予儿童家庭权力。方法纳入2015年至2021年发表在学术检索完整、护理和联合健康文献累积索引和Medline上的定性和定量研究,其中包括对医疗复杂性儿童护理协调计划的回顾。非研究性文章、关于成人的文章或用英语以外的语言撰写的文章被排除在外。采用约翰霍普金斯护理循证实践评分量表对证据进行评价。系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)清单用于构建本综述,以阻止偏倚风险。采用定性综合方法对结果进行分析和呈现。结论采用不同的策略来促进医疗复杂性儿童的护理协调。照料协调对儿童的影响不一致;然而,儿童的照顾者认为高质量的护理协调可以提高生活质量。有医疗复杂性的儿童的护理人员可用的工具有限,以协调跨医疗保健系统对其儿童的护理。由于研究的样本量小,并且研究中非英语家庭的代表性不足,因此泛化性是一个问题。由于高度参与的家庭愿意参与所选的研究,因此可能存在偏倚风险。实践意义有机会进一步开发和研究护理协调工具,以增强医疗复杂性儿童的护理人员的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Linking science and practice by publishing evidence-based information on pediatric nursing and answering the question, ''How might this information affect nursing practice?'' The Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing (JSPN) is the international evidence-based practice journal for nurses who specialize in the care of children and families. JSPN bridges the gap between research and practice by publishing peer-reviewed reliable, clinically relevant, and readily applicable evidence. The journal integrates the best evidence with pediatric nurses'' passion for achieving the best outcomes. The journal values interdisciplinary perspectives and publishes a wide variety of peer-reviewed papers on clinically relevant topics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Identifying actions taken by health care professionals during procedures involving children with autism spectrum disorders in a high technological environment: Using critical incident technique Factors influencing job stress in pediatric nurses during the pandemic period: Focusing on fatigue, pediatric nurse−parent partnership Issue Information Sexuality education for school-aged children and adolescents: A concept analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1