Assessment of Patients and Surgeons Satisfaction from Nasal Function and Appearance Following Closed Reduction

Milad Etemadi, S. Mohammadi, Mohammad Hossein Nikbakht, Olia Ghazavi
{"title":"Assessment of Patients and Surgeons Satisfaction from Nasal Function and Appearance Following Closed Reduction","authors":"Milad Etemadi, S. Mohammadi, Mohammad Hossein Nikbakht, Olia Ghazavi","doi":"10.18502/ijds.v18i3.11235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Nasal fracture is the most common fracture of the maxillofacial region, so surgeons’ and patients’ satisfaction after closed reduction from aesthetic and functional (including the effects of respiration and olfaction) perspective is important. The aim of this study was to evaluate the satisfaction of surgeons and patients with the appearance and function of the nose after closed reduction surgery during 6-12 months after surgery to improve the outcomes of this procedure. \nMaterials & Methods: This descriptive-analytical and cross-sectional study was performed on 90 patients in Alzahra and Kashani hospitals of Isfahan during the years 1397-1398 who underwent a closed reduction of nasal fracture within 6-12 months after surgery. All patients and surgeons answered questions about aesthetic and functional outcomes and the need for septorhinoplasty after closed reduction. Pearson correlation coefficient, t-test and paired-sample t-test were used to analyze the data. P value less than 0.05 was considered as a significant level. \nResults: About 55% of patients were satisfied with the aesthetic outcome and 38.8% expressed they would consider further surgery to correct the residual nasal deformity. The mean score of surgeons’ satisfaction for nasal aesthetics and function was 3.74 and 3.50. Surgeons expressed that the patients’ requirement for septorhinoplasty is low to moderate. \nConclusion: Satisfaction of the patient and the surgeon with the nasal closed reduction was in high-medium range. Also, according to both patients’ and surgeons’ opinions, requirement for septorhinoplasty surgery has a significant and direct relationship with aesthetic issues and also obstruction of the airway following a nasal bone fracture.","PeriodicalId":221865,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Isfahan Dental School","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Isfahan Dental School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijds.v18i3.11235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Nasal fracture is the most common fracture of the maxillofacial region, so surgeons’ and patients’ satisfaction after closed reduction from aesthetic and functional (including the effects of respiration and olfaction) perspective is important. The aim of this study was to evaluate the satisfaction of surgeons and patients with the appearance and function of the nose after closed reduction surgery during 6-12 months after surgery to improve the outcomes of this procedure. Materials & Methods: This descriptive-analytical and cross-sectional study was performed on 90 patients in Alzahra and Kashani hospitals of Isfahan during the years 1397-1398 who underwent a closed reduction of nasal fracture within 6-12 months after surgery. All patients and surgeons answered questions about aesthetic and functional outcomes and the need for septorhinoplasty after closed reduction. Pearson correlation coefficient, t-test and paired-sample t-test were used to analyze the data. P value less than 0.05 was considered as a significant level. Results: About 55% of patients were satisfied with the aesthetic outcome and 38.8% expressed they would consider further surgery to correct the residual nasal deformity. The mean score of surgeons’ satisfaction for nasal aesthetics and function was 3.74 and 3.50. Surgeons expressed that the patients’ requirement for septorhinoplasty is low to moderate. Conclusion: Satisfaction of the patient and the surgeon with the nasal closed reduction was in high-medium range. Also, according to both patients’ and surgeons’ opinions, requirement for septorhinoplasty surgery has a significant and direct relationship with aesthetic issues and also obstruction of the airway following a nasal bone fracture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
闭合复位术后患者和外科医生对鼻功能和外观满意度的评估
鼻骨折是颌面部最常见的骨折,因此从美观和功能(包括呼吸和嗅觉的影响)的角度来看,闭式复位后外科医生和患者的满意度是很重要的。本研究的目的是评估外科医生和患者在术后6-12个月内对闭合复位手术后鼻外观和功能的满意度,以提高手术效果。材料与方法:本描述性分析和横断面研究对1397-1398年间在伊斯法罕Alzahra和Kashani医院接受术后6-12个月内鼻部骨折闭合性复位术的90例患者进行。所有患者和外科医生都回答了关于美学和功能结果以及闭合性复位后鼻中隔成形术的必要性的问题。采用Pearson相关系数、t检验和配对样本t检验对数据进行分析。P值小于0.05为显著水平。结果:约55%的患者对美学效果满意,38.8%的患者表示会考虑进一步手术矫正鼻残畸形。鼻部美观和功能满意度的平均得分分别为3.74分和3.50分。外科医生表示,患者对鼻中隔成形术的要求是低到中等。结论:患者和术者对鼻部闭式复位术的满意度处于中高水平。此外,根据患者和外科医生的意见,鼻中隔成形术的要求与鼻骨骨折后的美学问题和气道阻塞有着重要而直接的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigation of Morphological Variations of Canal and Root of First Mandibular Molar in Tomographic Images Computer with Cone Beam in Patients of Arak City Treatment of Severe Anterior Open-bite Accompany with Impacted Canine: A Case Report The Ability of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Periodontal Tissue Regeneration: A Comprehensive Review of Literature Immunohistochemical Expression of Alpha Smooth Muscle Actin Positive Myofibroblast and Laminin 5 gamma 2 in Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Verrucous Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity Evaluation of the Relationship between rs17561 and rs1143634 Genetic Polymorphisms and the Risk of Chronic Periodontitis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1