Assessing National Institutes of Health Prevention Research on Leading Causes of Death Focused on Racial or Ethnic Minority Populations, Fiscal Years 2016-2020

Luis F. Ganoza, J. Alvidrez, Charlene A. Liggins
{"title":"Assessing National Institutes of Health Prevention Research on Leading Causes of Death Focused on Racial or Ethnic Minority Populations, Fiscal Years 2016-2020","authors":"Luis F. Ganoza, J. Alvidrez, Charlene A. Liggins","doi":"10.18865/1718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n To characterize the National Institutes of Health (NIH) prevention research portfolio on leading causes of death focused on racial or ethnic minority populations.\n \n \n \n Longitudinal analysis of NIH-funded prevention research projects from FY2016-FY2020.\n \n \n \n Project characteristics including type of prevention, study design, budget, minority health focus, and causes of death addressed.\n \n \n \n Minority health projects comprised 27.0% of prevention projects and 33.1% of funding across all leading causes of death. Homicide (42.9%), diabetes (36.3%), and stroke (35.5%) had the highest proportion of minority health projects and suicide (20.2%), Alzheimer disease (18.8%), and pneumonia or influenza (8.3%) the lowest. Most minority health projects focused on identifying risk factors or on primary prevention efforts (80.3%). Most projects had an observational design (80.0%), and this predominance was observed for each cause of death. There was a significant correlation between the proportion of minority health projects for cause of death and the ratio of minorities versus non-minorities mortality rate.\n \n \n \n Only about one-fourth of NIH-funded prevention research on leading causes of death focused on racial or ethnic minorities, who currently comprise about 40% of the US population. Only a small fraction of minority health prevention projects included an intervention design, suggesting a limited contribution to the evidence base on effective interventions to address racial or ethnic mortality disparities. Also, we identified that the number of projects increase where mortality rate disparities are higher. This portfolio analysis provides a useful baseline to assess future progress in building the minority health prevention research portfolio, a critical component to promoting health equity in population health.\n","PeriodicalId":315728,"journal":{"name":"Ethnicity and Disease","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnicity and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18865/1718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To characterize the National Institutes of Health (NIH) prevention research portfolio on leading causes of death focused on racial or ethnic minority populations. Longitudinal analysis of NIH-funded prevention research projects from FY2016-FY2020. Project characteristics including type of prevention, study design, budget, minority health focus, and causes of death addressed. Minority health projects comprised 27.0% of prevention projects and 33.1% of funding across all leading causes of death. Homicide (42.9%), diabetes (36.3%), and stroke (35.5%) had the highest proportion of minority health projects and suicide (20.2%), Alzheimer disease (18.8%), and pneumonia or influenza (8.3%) the lowest. Most minority health projects focused on identifying risk factors or on primary prevention efforts (80.3%). Most projects had an observational design (80.0%), and this predominance was observed for each cause of death. There was a significant correlation between the proportion of minority health projects for cause of death and the ratio of minorities versus non-minorities mortality rate. Only about one-fourth of NIH-funded prevention research on leading causes of death focused on racial or ethnic minorities, who currently comprise about 40% of the US population. Only a small fraction of minority health prevention projects included an intervention design, suggesting a limited contribution to the evidence base on effective interventions to address racial or ethnic mortality disparities. Also, we identified that the number of projects increase where mortality rate disparities are higher. This portfolio analysis provides a useful baseline to assess future progress in building the minority health prevention research portfolio, a critical component to promoting health equity in population health.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估国家卫生预防研究所2016-2020财政年度以种族或少数民族人口为重点的主要死亡原因
美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)针对主要死亡原因的预防研究组合以种族或少数民族人口为重点。2016- 2020财年美国国立卫生研究院资助的预防研究项目纵向分析项目特征包括预防类型、研究设计、预算、少数民族健康重点和死亡原因。少数群体保健项目占预防项目的27.0%,占所有主要死亡原因供资的33.1%。凶杀(42.9%)、糖尿病(36.3%)和中风(35.5%)的少数族裔健康项目比例最高,自杀(20.2%)、阿尔茨海默病(18.8%)、肺炎或流感(8.3%)的比例最低。大多数少数民族保健项目侧重于确定风险因素或初级预防工作(80.3%)。大多数项目采用观察性设计(80.0%),每种死亡原因均存在这种优势。少数族裔保健项目的死因比例与少数族裔与非少数族裔死亡率之比之间存在显著相关性。美国国立卫生研究院资助的关于主要死亡原因的预防研究中,只有大约四分之一的研究重点是种族或少数民族,他们目前约占美国人口的40%。只有一小部分少数族裔健康预防项目包括干预设计,这表明对解决种族或族裔死亡率差异的有效干预措施的证据基础的贡献有限。此外,我们还发现,在死亡率差距较大的地方,项目数量会增加。这一组合分析为评估在建立少数群体健康预防研究组合方面的未来进展提供了有用的基线,这是促进人口健康方面的健康公平的关键组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Social Determinants of Health Variables in Advanced Analytic and Artificial Intelligence Models for Cardiovascular Disease Risk and Outcomes: A Targeted Review Prevalence and Correlates of HIV-Associated Health Behaviors in a Population-Based Sample of Puerto Rican Adults, 2019 Commentary: Public Health Surveillance and Health Equity: Cause for Concern Association of Diabetic Retinopathy with Chronic Kidney Disease Progression in Latinos with Type 2 Diabetes Assessing National Institutes of Health Prevention Research on Leading Causes of Death Focused on Racial or Ethnic Minority Populations, Fiscal Years 2016-2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1