Experimental Evidence of Source Preference: Familiarity and Home Bias

S. Chew, K. Li, Jacob S. Sagi
{"title":"Experimental Evidence of Source Preference: Familiarity and Home Bias","authors":"S. Chew, K. Li, Jacob S. Sagi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3870716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper experimentally tests the Fox-Tversky (1995) source preference hypothesis as axiomatized in Chew and Sagi (2008) where people may have preference between equally distributed risks depending on the underlying sources of uncertainty. We study two forms of source preference. One is based on familiarity of risks arising from the trailing digit of stock prices in the home city exchange. Another is based on the trailing digit of the market index of the home city versus that of a foreign city. We find a familiarity-based source preference in portfolios comprising strictly dominated bets associated with more familiar stocks and in valuation of bets elicited using an ascending-price auction. Complementarily, we find a home bias in terms of Shanghai (Hong Kong) subjects preferring to bet on the trailing digit of the Shanghai Stock Exchange Index (Hang Seng Index) even though the same bets based on Dow Jones Industrial Average would pay more. Taken together, our study suggests that home bias is driven mainly by source preference rather than ambiguity aversion.","PeriodicalId":365642,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Behavioral Finance (Microeconomics) (Topic)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Behavioral Finance (Microeconomics) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3870716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper experimentally tests the Fox-Tversky (1995) source preference hypothesis as axiomatized in Chew and Sagi (2008) where people may have preference between equally distributed risks depending on the underlying sources of uncertainty. We study two forms of source preference. One is based on familiarity of risks arising from the trailing digit of stock prices in the home city exchange. Another is based on the trailing digit of the market index of the home city versus that of a foreign city. We find a familiarity-based source preference in portfolios comprising strictly dominated bets associated with more familiar stocks and in valuation of bets elicited using an ascending-price auction. Complementarily, we find a home bias in terms of Shanghai (Hong Kong) subjects preferring to bet on the trailing digit of the Shanghai Stock Exchange Index (Hang Seng Index) even though the same bets based on Dow Jones Industrial Average would pay more. Taken together, our study suggests that home bias is driven mainly by source preference rather than ambiguity aversion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来源偏好的实验证据:熟悉度与家乡偏好
本文通过实验检验了Fox-Tversky(1995)的来源偏好假设,该假设在Chew和Sagi(2008)中得到了公理化,即人们可能会根据潜在的不确定性来源在平均分布的风险之间产生偏好。我们研究了来源偏好的两种形式。一种是基于对本地交易所股票价格走势所带来的风险的熟悉程度。另一种是基于本国城市与外国城市市场指数的尾数。我们发现,在与更熟悉的股票相关的严格主导押注的投资组合中,以及在使用价格上涨拍卖引发的押注估值中,存在基于熟悉度的资源偏好。与之相辅相成的是,我们发现上海(香港)的受访者更倾向于押注上海证券交易所指数(恒生指数)的尾数,尽管同样的押注基于道琼斯工业平均指数会获得更高的回报。综上所述,我们的研究表明,家乡偏见主要是由来源偏好而不是模糊厌恶驱动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The CEO Factor: Public Perception and Stock Price Firm Growth Potential and Option Returns Does Import Competition from China Discipline Overconfident CEOs in U.S. Firms? Experimental Evidence of Source Preference: Familiarity and Home Bias Let Me Sleep on It: Sleep and Investor Reactions to Earnings Surprises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1