Why do we read illness stories?

L. Nesby, M. Johansen
{"title":"Why do we read illness stories?","authors":"L. Nesby, M. Johansen","doi":"10.7146/tfss.v16i31.116964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Why do we read pathographies and why have they become so popular? These are the key questions in our paper. In answering these, we will introduce and discuss Rita Felski’s The Uses of Literature (2008) in connection to the American bestseller and Pulitzer prize finalist pathography When Breath Becomes Air (2016) by Paul Kalanithi. \nWe chose Kalanithi’s book because we consider it in many ways typical of the pathographical genre with its first-person narrator, the frequent expression of shock, its reflections on meaning of the illness and the focus on daily life. Rita Felski’s The uses of literature reflects by means of the four concepts knowledge, recognition, shock and enchantment upon what makes us want to read a certain book or genre. However, when working with Kalanithi´s novel we soon found that Felski´s four modes were not only meaning-making for enlightening the question on why we as readers turn to this book. We soon also found that recognition, enchantment, knowledge and shock were concepts that were relevant used in connection with Kalanithi´s own experience of becoming ill and being a patient. The concepts, therefore, seem most useful for reflections on both the reader’s response and the author drives of the pathography genre.","PeriodicalId":110718,"journal":{"name":"Tidsskrift for Forskning i Sygdom og Samfund","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tidsskrift for Forskning i Sygdom og Samfund","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/tfss.v16i31.116964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Why do we read pathographies and why have they become so popular? These are the key questions in our paper. In answering these, we will introduce and discuss Rita Felski’s The Uses of Literature (2008) in connection to the American bestseller and Pulitzer prize finalist pathography When Breath Becomes Air (2016) by Paul Kalanithi. We chose Kalanithi’s book because we consider it in many ways typical of the pathographical genre with its first-person narrator, the frequent expression of shock, its reflections on meaning of the illness and the focus on daily life. Rita Felski’s The uses of literature reflects by means of the four concepts knowledge, recognition, shock and enchantment upon what makes us want to read a certain book or genre. However, when working with Kalanithi´s novel we soon found that Felski´s four modes were not only meaning-making for enlightening the question on why we as readers turn to this book. We soon also found that recognition, enchantment, knowledge and shock were concepts that were relevant used in connection with Kalanithi´s own experience of becoming ill and being a patient. The concepts, therefore, seem most useful for reflections on both the reader’s response and the author drives of the pathography genre.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么我们要读疾病故事?
为什么我们要读病理?为什么它们变得如此流行?这些都是我们论文的关键问题。为了回答这些问题,我们将介绍和讨论丽塔·费尔斯基的《文学的用途》(2008),以及保罗·卡拉尼蒂的《当呼吸变成空气》(2016),该书是美国畅销书,也是普利策奖的入围作品。我们之所以选择卡拉尼蒂的书,是因为我们认为它在很多方面都是典型的病理类型:第一人称叙述者,频繁表达震惊,对疾病意义的思考,以及对日常生活的关注。丽塔·费尔斯基的《文学的使用》一书通过知识、认知、震惊和着迷四个概念来反映是什么让我们想要阅读某种书籍或类型。然而,当我们研究Kalanithi的小说时,我们很快发现Felski的四种模式不仅仅是为了启发我们作为读者为什么会转向这本书的问题。我们很快也发现,识别、魔法、知识和震惊这些概念与Kalanithi自己生病和成为病人的经历有关。因此,这些概念对于思考读者的反应和作者对病理体裁的驱动似乎是最有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring, describing, and mapping the constitutive elements of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) used in clinical practice Ansvarshierarki i lægemiddelomsorgen på plejehjem Global sundhed i dansk perspektiv Eksistentiel og åndelig omsorg i post-sekulære kontekster Undgå at digitale PRO-skemaer bidrager til ulighed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1