Evaluation of Roundabout Capacity Models: An Empirical Case Study

Liang Ren, X. Qu, H. Guan, S. Easa, E. Oh
{"title":"Evaluation of Roundabout Capacity Models: An Empirical Case Study","authors":"Liang Ren, X. Qu, H. Guan, S. Easa, E. Oh","doi":"10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractBased on field data collected at nine roundabouts in Gold Coast, Australia, this paper evaluates the performance of the capacity estimation for single-lane roundabouts using analytical models [including the highway capacity manual (HCM) 2000 model, the German Highway Capacity Manual (GHCM) model, the signalized and unsignalized intersection design and research aid (SIDRA) model and a new roundabout capacity (NRC) model] and an empirical model (the HCM 2010 model). First, this study calibrates critical gaps, follow-up times, and conflicting flows. Compared with the capacities measured in the field, the authors carry out a study to analyze the accuracy of the HCM, GHCM, SIDRA, and NRC models. The results show that the five models underestimate capacity but the NRC model produces a smaller range of relative error (−1.07 to −5.74%) and root-mean-square deviation (47.68) than the HCM 2010 (−4.62 to −16.14% and 105.00, respectively), HCM 2000 (−5.76 to −17.21% and 115.29, respectively), GHCM (−8.95 to −...","PeriodicalId":305908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transportation Engineering-asce","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transportation Engineering-asce","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

AbstractBased on field data collected at nine roundabouts in Gold Coast, Australia, this paper evaluates the performance of the capacity estimation for single-lane roundabouts using analytical models [including the highway capacity manual (HCM) 2000 model, the German Highway Capacity Manual (GHCM) model, the signalized and unsignalized intersection design and research aid (SIDRA) model and a new roundabout capacity (NRC) model] and an empirical model (the HCM 2010 model). First, this study calibrates critical gaps, follow-up times, and conflicting flows. Compared with the capacities measured in the field, the authors carry out a study to analyze the accuracy of the HCM, GHCM, SIDRA, and NRC models. The results show that the five models underestimate capacity but the NRC model produces a smaller range of relative error (−1.07 to −5.74%) and root-mean-square deviation (47.68) than the HCM 2010 (−4.62 to −16.14% and 105.00, respectively), HCM 2000 (−5.76 to −17.21% and 115.29, respectively), GHCM (−8.95 to −...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环岛容量模型评价:实证研究
摘要基于澳大利亚黄金海岸9个环形交叉路口的现场数据,采用分析模型(包括公路通行能力手册(HCM) 2000模型、德国公路通行能力手册(GHCM)模型、信号化与非信号化交叉口设计与研究辅助(SIDRA)模型和新型环形交叉路口通行能力模型)和经验模型(HCM 2010模型)对单车道环形交叉路口通行能力估算的性能进行了评价。首先,本研究校准了关键缺口、后续时间和冲突流。将HCM、GHCM、SIDRA和NRC模型的精度与野外实测能力进行对比分析。结果表明,5个模型均低估了植被容量,但NRC模型的相对误差范围(- 1.07 ~ - 5.74%)和均方根偏差(47.68)均小于HCM 2010(- 4.62 ~ - 16.14%和105.00)、HCM 2000(- 5.76 ~ - 17.21%和115.29)和GHCM(- 8.95 ~ - 5.29)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
User Perspectives on Distance- and Time-Based Road Tolling Schemes: European Case Study Right-Hook Crash Scenario: Effects of Environmental Factors on Driver’s Visual Attention and Crash Risk Assessment of Methodological Alternatives for Modeling the Spatiotemporal Crossing Compliance of Pedestrians at Signalized Midblock Crosswalks Analysis of kinematic parameters and driver behavior at turbo roundabouts Individual and Synergetic Effects of Transit Service Improvement Strategies: Simulation and Validation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1