The Impact of Ruminative Thinking on Verbal and Visual Task Performance

Melissa L. Johnman, M. Boschen
{"title":"The Impact of Ruminative Thinking on Verbal and Visual Task Performance","authors":"Melissa L. Johnman, M. Boschen","doi":"10.59158/001c.73835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research shows the detrimental effects of rumination on individuals’ cognitive performance. However, there is limited research regarding rumination interference on task performance. The aim of this study was to investigate the link between rumination and cognition and explore if its impact is better described by Baddeley’s working memory model or Borkovec’s cognitive avoidance theory of worry. A laboratory experiment was conducted comparing three ruminative valence groups (negative, neutral, and positive). The aim was to explore individuals’ performance on a verbal and visual free-recall task and determine interference effects. Task scores pre- and post-rumination were collected from 69 university student participants and two 3 × 2 ANOVAs were conducted. The results suggest rumination may not interfere with individuals’ verbal and visual task performance, indicating the link between rumination and cognition may not be as significant as previously suggested. Furthermore, the results suggest that Baddeley’s model is a better description of rumination impacts on task performance compared to Borkovec’s theoretical model.","PeriodicalId":394035,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Counselling Journal of Australia","volume":"242 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy and Counselling Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59158/001c.73835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Research shows the detrimental effects of rumination on individuals’ cognitive performance. However, there is limited research regarding rumination interference on task performance. The aim of this study was to investigate the link between rumination and cognition and explore if its impact is better described by Baddeley’s working memory model or Borkovec’s cognitive avoidance theory of worry. A laboratory experiment was conducted comparing three ruminative valence groups (negative, neutral, and positive). The aim was to explore individuals’ performance on a verbal and visual free-recall task and determine interference effects. Task scores pre- and post-rumination were collected from 69 university student participants and two 3 × 2 ANOVAs were conducted. The results suggest rumination may not interfere with individuals’ verbal and visual task performance, indicating the link between rumination and cognition may not be as significant as previously suggested. Furthermore, the results suggest that Baddeley’s model is a better description of rumination impacts on task performance compared to Borkovec’s theoretical model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反刍思维对言语和视觉任务表现的影响
研究表明,反刍对个人的认知表现有不利影响。然而,反刍干扰对任务绩效的影响研究有限。本研究的目的是探讨反刍与认知之间的联系,并探讨其影响是由Baddeley的工作记忆模型还是Borkovec的担忧认知回避理论更好地描述的。采用室内实验对三组反刍价(阴性、中性和阳性)进行了比较。目的是探索个体在言语和视觉自由回忆任务中的表现,并确定干扰效应。收集69名大学生反刍前后的任务得分,进行2次3 × 2方差分析。结果表明,反刍可能不会干扰个人的语言和视觉任务表现,这表明反刍和认知之间的联系可能不像之前认为的那么重要。此外,与Borkovec的理论模型相比,Baddeley模型更能描述反刍对任务绩效的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Collaborative Writing and Psychotherapy: Flattening the Hierarchy Between Therapist and Client (2024) by Trish Thompson and Dan X. Harris. Routledge. ISBN: 9781032213880 Levels of Therapeutic Relationship When Working With Male Clients The Movements of Grief The Role of Mindfulness and Embodiment in Group-Based Trauma Treatment Editorial: Valuing Indigenous Voices Despite the “No” Vote
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1