Levels of Therapeutic Relationship When Working With Male Clients

Michael W. Ellwood
{"title":"Levels of Therapeutic Relationship When Working With Male Clients","authors":"Michael W. Ellwood","doi":"10.59158/001c.116699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At a time when men are seeking therapeutic support at increased levels, identifying and responding to the type of engagement sought by male clients increases the possibility for stronger engagement and retention of men in therapy. This highlights the importance of the perceived challenges of engaging and working with male clients, particularly in attempting to overcome the temptation to label such clients as “resistant”. In 1988, Steve de Shazer and the Brief Family Therapy Centre proposed that clients present seeking different levels of therapeutic engagement (visitor, complainant, and customer relationships). A more recent solution-focused model originating in Bruges has suggested similar levels of engagement between client and practitioner (uncommitted, searching, consultant, and expert relationships; Isebaert, 2016). This paper compares and discusses the two models of therapeutic engagement levels and considers the clinical implications of these for working therapeutically with male clients.","PeriodicalId":394035,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Counselling Journal of Australia","volume":"75 S1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy and Counselling Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59158/001c.116699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At a time when men are seeking therapeutic support at increased levels, identifying and responding to the type of engagement sought by male clients increases the possibility for stronger engagement and retention of men in therapy. This highlights the importance of the perceived challenges of engaging and working with male clients, particularly in attempting to overcome the temptation to label such clients as “resistant”. In 1988, Steve de Shazer and the Brief Family Therapy Centre proposed that clients present seeking different levels of therapeutic engagement (visitor, complainant, and customer relationships). A more recent solution-focused model originating in Bruges has suggested similar levels of engagement between client and practitioner (uncommitted, searching, consultant, and expert relationships; Isebaert, 2016). This paper compares and discusses the two models of therapeutic engagement levels and considers the clinical implications of these for working therapeutically with male clients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与男性客户合作时的治疗关系水平
当男性寻求治疗支持的人数越来越多时,识别并回应男性客户所寻求的参与类型,就能增加男性参与治疗并留住他们的可能性。这凸显了与男性求助者接触和合作所面临的挑战的重要性,尤其是在试图克服将这类求助者贴上 "抗拒 "标签的诱惑时。1988 年,史蒂夫-德-沙泽(Steve de Shazer)和简短家庭治疗中心(Brief Family Therapy Centre)提出,求助者寻求不同层次的治疗参与(来访者、投诉者和客户关系)。最近,起源于布鲁日的一个以解决方案为中心的模型提出了客户与实践者之间类似的参与程度(非承诺关系、探索关系、顾问关系和专家关系;Isebaert,2016 年)。本文比较并讨论了这两种治疗参与度模型,并探讨了这些模型对男性客户治疗工作的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Collaborative Writing and Psychotherapy: Flattening the Hierarchy Between Therapist and Client (2024) by Trish Thompson and Dan X. Harris. Routledge. ISBN: 9781032213880 Levels of Therapeutic Relationship When Working With Male Clients The Movements of Grief The Role of Mindfulness and Embodiment in Group-Based Trauma Treatment Editorial: Valuing Indigenous Voices Despite the “No” Vote
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1