Analysis of the position of socio-humanitarian journals on the Science Index: old vs new

V. Blaginin, E. Sokolova
{"title":"Analysis of the position of socio-humanitarian journals on the Science Index: old vs new","authors":"V. Blaginin, E. Sokolova","doi":"10.24069/sep-23-05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to assess the extent to which the new methodology of calculating the Science Index integral index for scientific journals influences the change in the position of Russian socio-humanities journals indexed in the Web of Science and/or Scopus international databases, relative to past results and trends. These journals are chosen as the object of analysis due to the fact that the Science Index calculation is now performed according to the new methodology with normalization according to the RSCI core. The authors focus on the positioning of socio-humanitarian journals within the national publishing competition, taking into account theoretically possible and actual changes in scientometric indicators in dynamics.The study is based on the data of the analysis of publication activity of more than 130 Russian journals presented on the elibrary.ru platform from 2012–2021 before and after the change in the methodology of Science Index integral index calculation and subsequent recalculation. In the course of the study, the journals were ranked according to both the current 2021 indicators before and after the change in calculation methodology, and the retrospective indicators predicted using three time-series forecasting methods (ARIMA, nnetar and ETS) before and after the change in calculation methodology. The results of this study form an idea of the “attention demanding” impact of the implementation of the new Science Index calculation methodology, which significantly limits the number of journals considered for citation calculation, on the positions of individual publications and scientific fields and changes in the balance of the Russian scientific world as a whole.","PeriodicalId":256387,"journal":{"name":"Science Editor and Publisher","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Editor and Publisher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24069/sep-23-05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess the extent to which the new methodology of calculating the Science Index integral index for scientific journals influences the change in the position of Russian socio-humanities journals indexed in the Web of Science and/or Scopus international databases, relative to past results and trends. These journals are chosen as the object of analysis due to the fact that the Science Index calculation is now performed according to the new methodology with normalization according to the RSCI core. The authors focus on the positioning of socio-humanitarian journals within the national publishing competition, taking into account theoretically possible and actual changes in scientometric indicators in dynamics.The study is based on the data of the analysis of publication activity of more than 130 Russian journals presented on the elibrary.ru platform from 2012–2021 before and after the change in the methodology of Science Index integral index calculation and subsequent recalculation. In the course of the study, the journals were ranked according to both the current 2021 indicators before and after the change in calculation methodology, and the retrospective indicators predicted using three time-series forecasting methods (ARIMA, nnetar and ETS) before and after the change in calculation methodology. The results of this study form an idea of the “attention demanding” impact of the implementation of the new Science Index calculation methodology, which significantly limits the number of journals considered for citation calculation, on the positions of individual publications and scientific fields and changes in the balance of the Russian scientific world as a whole.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会人文期刊在科学指数中的地位分析:新旧对比
本研究的目的是评估计算科学期刊的科学指数综合指数的新方法对俄罗斯社会人文学科期刊在科学网和/或Scopus国际数据库中被索引的位置变化的影响程度,相对于过去的结果和趋势。之所以选择这些期刊作为分析对象,是因为现在科学指数的计算是按照新的方法进行的,并根据RSCI核心进行规范化。作者关注社会人文期刊在国家出版竞争中的定位,考虑到科学计量指标在动态方面的理论可能和实际变化。本研究基于对2012-2021年在library.ru平台上发表的130多种俄罗斯期刊的出版活动进行分析的数据,该数据是在科学指数积分指数计算方法改变前后以及随后的重新计算之后得出的。在研究过程中,根据计算方法变化前后的现行2021年指标对期刊进行排名,并在计算方法变化前后使用三种时间序列预测方法(ARIMA、nnetar和ETS)预测回顾性指标。这项研究的结果形成了新的科学指数计算方法的实施对个别出版物和科学领域的地位以及俄罗斯科学界整体平衡变化的“注意力需求”影响的想法,该方法大大限制了用于引文计算的期刊数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geopolitics and publication strategy. Is there a dependance? Metadata of articles in the field of agriculture: complications in translating from Russian into English Research Data Publishing Ethics Working Group flowchart: Authorship & Contributorship – Pre-publication Research Data Publishing Ethics Working Group flowchart: Scientific rigor – Unpublished data What do our trade journals publish?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1