Consequence Classification Based Spare Parts Evaluation and Control in the Petroleum Industry

R. Ratnayake
{"title":"Consequence Classification Based Spare Parts Evaluation and Control in the Petroleum Industry","authors":"R. Ratnayake","doi":"10.1109/IEEM44572.2019.8978802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spare parts (SPs) evaluation and control (SPE&C) has been a challenging task in the onshore and offshore petroleum industry, due to the highly hazardous and capital-intensive nature of operational assets. SPE&C requires that different phases of the petroleum asset's life cycle (i.e. commissioning, operations, modifications, and decommissioning) are taken into consideration via project execution. The requirements imposed by regulatory authorities, the recommendations suggested by classification societies and standards (i.e. national and international), and the guidelines available in the internal performance standards must be taken into consideration in an SPE&C process. SPE&C also requires contributions from several stakeholders from various disciplines, such as plant integrity, materials management, project management and package responsibility, as well as original equipment manufacturers/vendors, to establish a consensus about operational and work practices. Due to the inherent nature of the operational assets, the conventional inventory control approaches and formulae are mostly superimposed by consequence classifications and risk assessments. This has resulted in a significant level of ad hoc spare part recommendations, causing significant loss to asset owners. This manuscript firstly demonstrates current SPE&C practices in the petroleum industry. Secondly, it presents frameworks to standardize SPE&C tasks. Finally, it proposes inventory policies, based on consequence and unit cost, which provide an approach to compensate for ad hoc SPA&C tasks, to minimize SP-related losses to the assets' owners.","PeriodicalId":255418,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM44572.2019.8978802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Spare parts (SPs) evaluation and control (SPE&C) has been a challenging task in the onshore and offshore petroleum industry, due to the highly hazardous and capital-intensive nature of operational assets. SPE&C requires that different phases of the petroleum asset's life cycle (i.e. commissioning, operations, modifications, and decommissioning) are taken into consideration via project execution. The requirements imposed by regulatory authorities, the recommendations suggested by classification societies and standards (i.e. national and international), and the guidelines available in the internal performance standards must be taken into consideration in an SPE&C process. SPE&C also requires contributions from several stakeholders from various disciplines, such as plant integrity, materials management, project management and package responsibility, as well as original equipment manufacturers/vendors, to establish a consensus about operational and work practices. Due to the inherent nature of the operational assets, the conventional inventory control approaches and formulae are mostly superimposed by consequence classifications and risk assessments. This has resulted in a significant level of ad hoc spare part recommendations, causing significant loss to asset owners. This manuscript firstly demonstrates current SPE&C practices in the petroleum industry. Secondly, it presents frameworks to standardize SPE&C tasks. Finally, it proposes inventory policies, based on consequence and unit cost, which provide an approach to compensate for ad hoc SPA&C tasks, to minimize SP-related losses to the assets' owners.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于后果分类的石油工业备件评价与控制
由于作业资产的高风险和资本密集性,备件(SPs)评估与控制(SPE&C)一直是陆上和海上石油工业中一项具有挑战性的任务。SPE&C要求在项目执行过程中考虑到石油资产生命周期的不同阶段(即调试、运营、改造和退役)。在SPE&C过程中,必须考虑监管机构提出的要求,船级社和标准(即国家和国际)提出的建议,以及内部性能标准中可用的指导方针。SPE&C还需要来自不同学科的几个利益相关者的贡献,例如工厂完整性,材料管理,项目管理和包装责任,以及原始设备制造商/供应商,以建立关于操作和工作实践的共识。由于经营性资产的固有性质,传统的库存控制方法和公式多是由后果分类和风险评估叠加而成。这导致了大量的临时备件建议,给资产所有者造成了重大损失。本文首先展示了目前石油工业中SPE&C的实践。其次,提出了规范SPE&C任务的框架。最后,提出了基于后果和单位成本的库存政策,提供了一种补偿特殊SPA&C任务的方法,以最大限度地减少资产所有者的sp相关损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Locating Humanitarian Relief Effort Facility Using P-Center Method A Method of Fault Identification Considering High Fix Priority in Open Source Project Model-based Systems Engineering Process for Supporting Variant Selection in the Early Product Development Phase A Method of Parameter Estimation in Flexible Jump Diffusion Process Models for Open Source Maintenance Effort Management Kanban-CONWIP Hybrid Model for Improving Productivity of an Electrostatic Coating Process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1