PRINCIPAL OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE FACTORS THAT DETERMINE CORRUPTION

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Nowadays, on the stage of democratic state development the counterstand and prevention of corruption have great significance. To provide it, Ukraine holds on the course of implementation of anticorruption policy, the chief fundaments of which are legislated in The Constitution of Ukraine and in the Law of Ukraine “On Prevention of Corruption” and in the international treaties that are obligatory according to the consent of Verknovna Rada of Ukraine and in another regulatory legal acts. Scientific foundation of directions, means and methods of corruption prevention is represented in numerous treatises. Thus, there were widely covered by the scientists: modern problems of fight against corruption (Kulakovskiy R., 2005); issues of state and legal mechanism of corruption counterstand (Besdolniy M., 2009); instruments of corruption counterstand in community arsenal – from fight against corruption to prevention of corruption (Khmara O., 2010) etc. There were also represented by scientists the issues concerning: peculiarities of corruption’s factors influence on economical development of state (Andrei Shleifer, Robert W. Vishny., 1993); causes and factors of corruption and its influence on economy (Verstiuk S., 2001); causes and factors of corruption origin and fight against it (Didenko D., 2010); causes and factors of extension and mechanisms of fight against it (Driomov S., Kalnish Y., 2010) etc. Scientists distinguished objective and subjective factors are lied at the root of the causes of corruption and it’s a condition for corruption activities (Yatskiv I., 2008; Shediy M., 2012 etc.). The group of objective factors consists of: political, economical, legal, organizational and administrative, social and psychological, historical ones (Beliaev N., Volgareva I., Kropachev N., 1992 1 ; Andrei Shleifer, Robert W. Vishny., 1993 2 ; Christos