Teaching Methodological Approaches on The Study of International Relations: Case of Türkiye

E. Gökçe
{"title":"Teaching Methodological Approaches on The Study of International Relations: Case of Türkiye","authors":"E. Gökçe","doi":"10.11611/yead.1230732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focuses on the contents of the syllabuses of scientific research methods and equivalent courses in International Relations (IR) graduate programs in Türkiye. The study aims at analyzing what the subjects in the syllabus are and which subjects are taught. To display the distributions, two categories were determined under the theme of methodology and method. The first is the “meaning of science, philosophy of science and methodology” category, which represents the more philosophical and theoretical dimension, and the second is the “research methods” category, which represents the more technical dimension. Among 133 graduate programs, 141 syllabuses were scanned, and 68 syllabuses were examined. The research was designed according to the case study within the qualitative research approach. The data collection method of the study is document analysis. The data analysis method is content analysis. According to the findings, it was observed that there was a concentration on the “research methods” category at a rate of 81% and the category of “meaning of science, philosophy of science and methodology” at a rate of 19%. It was seen that the subjects of data collection methods, research designs, and data analysis methods were mostly covered in the category of “research methods”. The mixed research approach is almost non-existent in the syllabuses. It was determined that there is a concentration on the meaning of science and positivism within the category of the meaning of science, philosophy of science and methodology. Critical realism, anti-positivism, and pragmatism are among the least covered subjects. As a result, it showed that the syllabuses were not up-to-date, and the philosophical and theoretical part of the method was not discussed in depth in the lessons. In the study, a syllabus for research method courses was presented. This syllabus proposal is considered to be a guide for bringing method courses up-to-date.","PeriodicalId":422662,"journal":{"name":"Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.1230732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study focuses on the contents of the syllabuses of scientific research methods and equivalent courses in International Relations (IR) graduate programs in Türkiye. The study aims at analyzing what the subjects in the syllabus are and which subjects are taught. To display the distributions, two categories were determined under the theme of methodology and method. The first is the “meaning of science, philosophy of science and methodology” category, which represents the more philosophical and theoretical dimension, and the second is the “research methods” category, which represents the more technical dimension. Among 133 graduate programs, 141 syllabuses were scanned, and 68 syllabuses were examined. The research was designed according to the case study within the qualitative research approach. The data collection method of the study is document analysis. The data analysis method is content analysis. According to the findings, it was observed that there was a concentration on the “research methods” category at a rate of 81% and the category of “meaning of science, philosophy of science and methodology” at a rate of 19%. It was seen that the subjects of data collection methods, research designs, and data analysis methods were mostly covered in the category of “research methods”. The mixed research approach is almost non-existent in the syllabuses. It was determined that there is a concentration on the meaning of science and positivism within the category of the meaning of science, philosophy of science and methodology. Critical realism, anti-positivism, and pragmatism are among the least covered subjects. As a result, it showed that the syllabuses were not up-to-date, and the philosophical and theoretical part of the method was not discussed in depth in the lessons. In the study, a syllabus for research method courses was presented. This syllabus proposal is considered to be a guide for bringing method courses up-to-date.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际关系研究的教学方法:以台湾为例
本研究主要探讨台湾大学国际关系研究生课程的科学研究方法及相关课程的教学大纲内容。该研究旨在分析教学大纲中的科目是什么以及教授哪些科目。为了显示这些分布,在方法论和方法的主题下确定了两类。第一个是“科学的意义、科学哲学和方法论”范畴,它代表了更多的哲学和理论维度;第二个是“研究方法”范畴,它代表了更多的技术维度。在133个研究生课程中,扫描了141个教学大纲,检查了68个教学大纲。本研究是根据定性研究方法中的个案研究而设计的。本研究的资料收集方法为文献分析法。数据分析方法为内容分析。根据调查结果,“研究方法”类别的比例为81%,“科学意义、科学哲学和方法论”类别的比例为19%。可以看出,数据收集方法、研究设计、数据分析方法等科目,大部分都属于“研究方法”的范畴。混合研究方法在教学大纲中几乎不存在。在科学意义、科学哲学和方法论的范畴内,确定了对科学意义和实证主义的集中讨论。批判现实主义、反实证主义和实用主义是最少涉及的科目。结果,它表明教学大纲不是最新的,并且在课程中没有深入讨论该方法的哲学和理论部分。在研究中,提出了研究方法课程的教学大纲。本教学大纲建议被认为是使方法课程更新的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
APPLICATION OF 0-1 INTEGER GOAL PROGRAMMING FOR SHIFT SCHEDULING OF MEDICAL STAFF IN LABORATORY DEPARTMENT THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL STABILITY AND ECONOMIC FREEDOMS ON ECONOMIC GROWTH: EVIDENCE FROM DEVELOPING COUNTRIES WITH NEW QUANTITATIVE MODELS THE CONCEPT OF SOFT POWER IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF MIGRATION THE HUMAN DIMENSION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH WAREHOUSE LOCATION SELECTION WITH FUZZY C-MEANS METHOD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1