Quick verification of concurrent programs by iteratively relaxed scheduling

P. Metzler, Habib Saissi, P. Bokor, N. Suri
{"title":"Quick verification of concurrent programs by iteratively relaxed scheduling","authors":"P. Metzler, Habib Saissi, P. Bokor, N. Suri","doi":"10.1109/ASE.2017.8115688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The most prominent advantage of software verification over testing is a rigorous check of every possible software behavior. However, large state spaces of concurrent systems, due to non-deterministic scheduling, result in a slow automated verification process. Therefore, verification introduces a large delay between completion and deployment of concurrent software. This paper introduces a novel iterative approach to verification of concurrent programs that drastically reduces this delay. By restricting the execution of concurrent programs to a small set of admissible schedules, verification complexity and time is drastically reduced. Iteratively adding admissible schedules after their verification eventually restores non-deterministic scheduling. Thereby, our framework allows to find a sweet spot between a low verification delay and sufficient execution time performance. Our evaluation of a prototype implementation on well-known benchmark programs shows that after verifying only few schedules of the program, execution time overhead is competitive to existing deterministic multi-threading frameworks.","PeriodicalId":382876,"journal":{"name":"2017 32nd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 32nd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE.2017.8115688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The most prominent advantage of software verification over testing is a rigorous check of every possible software behavior. However, large state spaces of concurrent systems, due to non-deterministic scheduling, result in a slow automated verification process. Therefore, verification introduces a large delay between completion and deployment of concurrent software. This paper introduces a novel iterative approach to verification of concurrent programs that drastically reduces this delay. By restricting the execution of concurrent programs to a small set of admissible schedules, verification complexity and time is drastically reduced. Iteratively adding admissible schedules after their verification eventually restores non-deterministic scheduling. Thereby, our framework allows to find a sweet spot between a low verification delay and sufficient execution time performance. Our evaluation of a prototype implementation on well-known benchmark programs shows that after verifying only few schedules of the program, execution time overhead is competitive to existing deterministic multi-threading frameworks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过迭代放松调度快速验证并发程序
与测试相比,软件验证最突出的优点是对每一个可能的软件行为进行严格的检查。然而,由于非确定性调度,并发系统的大状态空间导致自动化验证过程缓慢。因此,验证在并发软件的完成和部署之间引入了很大的延迟。本文介绍了一种新的迭代方法来验证并发程序,大大减少了这种延迟。通过将并发程序的执行限制在一小组可接受的时间表中,验证的复杂性和时间大大减少。在验证后迭代地添加可接受的调度,最终恢复非确定性调度。因此,我们的框架允许在低验证延迟和足够的执行时间性能之间找到一个最佳点。我们在知名的基准程序上对原型实现进行了评估,结果表明,在验证了程序的几个调度之后,执行时间开销与现有的确定性多线程框架相比是具有竞争力的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
TiQi: A natural language interface for querying software project data A comprehensive study on real world concurrency bugs in Node.js Managing software evolution through semantic history slicing Software performance self-adaptation through efficient model predictive control Privacy-aware data-intensive applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1