Tolok Ukur Kesepadanan (Kafa’ah) dalam Pernikahan: Perspektif Ibnu ‘Abdil Barr dan Imam Ibnu Al-Humam

Athifatul Wafirah
{"title":"Tolok Ukur Kesepadanan (Kafa’ah) dalam Pernikahan: Perspektif Ibnu ‘Abdil Barr dan Imam Ibnu Al-Humam","authors":"Athifatul Wafirah","doi":"10.15642/alhukama.2021.11.2.115-139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is library research that aims to explain the thoughts of scholars regarding the concept of kafa'ah. The method chosen is the descriptive analysis method with a comparative approach, which describes the data regarding the opinion of Ibnu 'Abdil Barr and the opinion of Imam Ibnu Al-Humam about the benchmark of equivalence (kafa'ah) in marriage. The data is then analyzed using comparative analysis. From the results of the study, it was found that Ibnu 'Abdil Barr determined the benchmark of equivalence (kafa'ah) based on the Qur'an, Hadith, and ijma' al-madīnah experts. Meanwhile, Imam Ibnu Al-Humam in determining the criterion of equality (kafa'ah) in marriage is based on the Qur'an, Hadith, and 'urf. Ibnu 'Abdil Barr and Imam Ibnu Al-Humam have the same istinbat method, namely using the Qur'an and Hadith as the main and second basis. The difference between the two lies in determining the benchmark of equivalence (kafa'ah) in terms of religion alone, the basis for strengthening Ibn 'Abdil Barr in determining the benchmark of equivalence on the consensus of al-Madinah experts. Meanwhile, Imam Ibnu Al-Humam determines the benchmark of equivalence (kafa'ah) from five criteria, namely: lineage, independence, religion, wealth and profession. Imam Ibn Al-Humam uses 'urf as a consideration.","PeriodicalId":245959,"journal":{"name":"AL-HUKAMA'","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AL-HUKAMA'","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15642/alhukama.2021.11.2.115-139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This research is library research that aims to explain the thoughts of scholars regarding the concept of kafa'ah. The method chosen is the descriptive analysis method with a comparative approach, which describes the data regarding the opinion of Ibnu 'Abdil Barr and the opinion of Imam Ibnu Al-Humam about the benchmark of equivalence (kafa'ah) in marriage. The data is then analyzed using comparative analysis. From the results of the study, it was found that Ibnu 'Abdil Barr determined the benchmark of equivalence (kafa'ah) based on the Qur'an, Hadith, and ijma' al-madīnah experts. Meanwhile, Imam Ibnu Al-Humam in determining the criterion of equality (kafa'ah) in marriage is based on the Qur'an, Hadith, and 'urf. Ibnu 'Abdil Barr and Imam Ibnu Al-Humam have the same istinbat method, namely using the Qur'an and Hadith as the main and second basis. The difference between the two lies in determining the benchmark of equivalence (kafa'ah) in terms of religion alone, the basis for strengthening Ibn 'Abdil Barr in determining the benchmark of equivalence on the consensus of al-Madinah experts. Meanwhile, Imam Ibnu Al-Humam determines the benchmark of equivalence (kafa'ah) from five criteria, namely: lineage, independence, religion, wealth and profession. Imam Ibn Al-Humam uses 'urf as a consideration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本研究是图书馆研究,旨在解释学者对kafa'ah概念的看法。本研究选择的方法是采用比较方法的描述性分析方法,描述Ibnu’Abdil Barr和伊玛目Ibnu Al-Humam关于婚姻中对等基准(kafa’ah)的观点的数据。然后使用比较分析对数据进行分析。从研究结果来看,Ibnu 'Abdil Barr根据古兰经、圣训和ijma' al- mad nah专家确定了等效的基准(kafa'ah)。与此同时,伊玛目伊布·胡曼在确定婚姻中平等的标准(kafa’ah)时是基于《古兰经》、《圣训》和《urf》。Ibnu Abdil巴尔和伊玛目Ibnu Al-Humam istinbat相同的方法,即使用《古兰经》和穆罕默德言行录作为主要和第二基础。两者的区别在于仅从宗教角度确定对等基准(kafa’ah),这是加强伊本·阿卜迪勒·巴尔在麦地那专家共识基础上确定对等基准的基础。同时,伊玛目伊布·胡玛姆从血统、独立、宗教、财富和职业五个标准来确定等价的基准(kafa’ah)。伊玛目伊本·胡曼用“urf”作为考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Early Marriage in Kaliboto Kidul on Maqasid Sharia Perspective Between Work and Family: Multiple Role Strategies of Career Women in Sultan Agung Islamic University Tracing the Equity on Islamic Heirs: The Reach of Inheritance of Substitute Heirs on the Compilation of Islamic Law For the Sake of Protecting Physcal Needs: Maqasid Sharia Perspective Toward Judges Consideration on Child Custody The Closure of Isbat For Polygamous Marriage on Legal Purpose Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1