The information architecture of PDAs-its impact on user comprehension and risk perception

Li-Jen Wang, Meng-Cong Zheng
{"title":"The information architecture of PDAs-its impact on user comprehension and risk perception","authors":"Li-Jen Wang, Meng-Cong Zheng","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1003195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Communication technology has been widely used in healthcare. There is a trend for one of the decision-making aids in innovative healthcare to become interactive web pages and applications. However, users often do not understand professional medical information and health values, especially those with poor numeracy skills. Therefore, more research is needed on translating complex medical information into simple guidelines that users can effectively understand and operate.Aims: This study aims to understand the impact of author-driven and reader-driven information architectures on users of patient decision aids.Methods: Author-driven and reader-driven framework models were developed for the same topic of patient decision aids. Users of different numerical abilities were evaluated on their comprehension, risk perception, usability, and task load. A total of 38 participants were assessed, of which 17 were reader-driven models, and 21 were author-driven models.Results: The results showed that reader-driven model participants were significantly better at comprehension than the author-driven model(p=0.025), but there was no significant difference in risk perception. Author-driven model usability was higher, but overall usability was lower. In the task load section, participants demanded more mental, physical, time pressure, effort, and stress feelings in the reader-driven model, especially in the time pressure section (p=0.011). In contrast, participants were more satisfied with their self-operational performance in the author-driven model. There was no significant difference between the two models regarding comprehension and risk perception between participants with excellent and lousy numeracy skills. However, among those with good numeracy skills, reader-driven model comprehension performance was significantly better than the author-driven model (p=0.018), and there was no significant difference in risk perception.Discussion: We found that the information architecture in patient decision aids impacts the user's comprehension. In the future, the information navigation framework of patient decision aids should consider the numerical ability of the user when developing them.","PeriodicalId":409565,"journal":{"name":"Usability and User Experience","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Usability and User Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Communication technology has been widely used in healthcare. There is a trend for one of the decision-making aids in innovative healthcare to become interactive web pages and applications. However, users often do not understand professional medical information and health values, especially those with poor numeracy skills. Therefore, more research is needed on translating complex medical information into simple guidelines that users can effectively understand and operate.Aims: This study aims to understand the impact of author-driven and reader-driven information architectures on users of patient decision aids.Methods: Author-driven and reader-driven framework models were developed for the same topic of patient decision aids. Users of different numerical abilities were evaluated on their comprehension, risk perception, usability, and task load. A total of 38 participants were assessed, of which 17 were reader-driven models, and 21 were author-driven models.Results: The results showed that reader-driven model participants were significantly better at comprehension than the author-driven model(p=0.025), but there was no significant difference in risk perception. Author-driven model usability was higher, but overall usability was lower. In the task load section, participants demanded more mental, physical, time pressure, effort, and stress feelings in the reader-driven model, especially in the time pressure section (p=0.011). In contrast, participants were more satisfied with their self-operational performance in the author-driven model. There was no significant difference between the two models regarding comprehension and risk perception between participants with excellent and lousy numeracy skills. However, among those with good numeracy skills, reader-driven model comprehension performance was significantly better than the author-driven model (p=0.018), and there was no significant difference in risk perception.Discussion: We found that the information architecture in patient decision aids impacts the user's comprehension. In the future, the information navigation framework of patient decision aids should consider the numerical ability of the user when developing them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
pda的信息架构对用户理解和风险感知的影响
通信技术在医疗保健中得到了广泛的应用。交互式网页和应用程序是创新医疗保健决策辅助工具之一的趋势。然而,用户往往不了解专业的医疗信息和健康价值,特别是那些计算能力差的用户。因此,如何将复杂的医学信息转化为用户能够有效理解和操作的简单指南,还需要进行更多的研究。目的:本研究旨在了解作者驱动和读者驱动的信息架构对患者决策辅助工具用户的影响。方法:针对患者辅助决策的同一主题,分别建立作者驱动和读者驱动的框架模型。不同的数字能力的用户评估他们的理解,风险感知,可用性和任务负荷。总共评估了38个参与者,其中17个是读者驱动的模型,21个是作者驱动的模型。结果:读者驱动的被试在理解能力上显著优于作者驱动的被试(p=0.025),但在风险感知上差异无统计学意义。作者驱动的模型可用性较高,但总体可用性较低。在任务负荷部分,被试在读者驱动模型中要求更多的精神、身体、时间压力、努力和压力感受,尤其是在时间压力部分(p=0.011)。相比之下,在作者驱动模式下,参与者对自己的自我操作表现更满意。在计算能力优秀和糟糕的参与者之间,两种模型在理解和风险感知方面没有显著差异。而在计算能力较好的学生中,读者驱动的模型理解能力显著优于作者驱动的模型理解能力(p=0.018),风险感知能力无显著差异。讨论:我们发现患者决策辅助的信息架构影响了用户的理解。未来,患者决策辅助工具的信息导航框架在开发时应考虑用户的数字能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Colormap-Based Effectiveness of Basic Visualizations Eliciting potential for positive UX using psychological needs: Towards a user-centered method to identify technologies for UX in the car interior Heuristic Evaluation of Public Service Chatbots Deep Analysis of the Web Accessibility and Usability of Videoconferencing Platforms for Blind People Controlled experimentation to improve the usability of business management systems: UDA-ERP case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1