Development and validation of headteachers' leadership behavior questionnaire (HLBQ)

Nyla Ramzan, Azmat Farooq Ahmad Khurram, Nighat Ahsan
{"title":"Development and validation of headteachers' leadership behavior questionnaire (HLBQ)","authors":"Nyla Ramzan, Azmat Farooq Ahmad Khurram, Nighat Ahsan","doi":"10.31580/jmi.v9i2.2656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The leadership behavior of the headteachers is associated with institutional worth. This study intended to develop and validate a headteachers’ leadership behavior questionnaire (HLBQ) to measure the leadership behavior of headteachers. The questionnaire encompassed two sub-dimensions viz: people-oriented leadership behavior and task-oriented leadership behavior as per Blake and Mouton’s Managerial Grid. After a rigorous literature review followed by focus group discussions, the preliminary draft of the tool encompassed forty-three (43) items on the five (5) points Likert Scale. Based on the content and face validity, the items with CVR values less than 0.42 were dropped. The revised questionnaire was pilot tested on three hundred and ten (310) public secondary school teachers employed in the school education department. The data were processed through Smart PLS version 4, which provided the questionnaire’s validity, reliability, and model fit. After deleting the unfit items, the questionnaire was further reduced to thirty-one (31) items. AVE values of the items related to people-oriented leadership behavior were 0.658 > 0.5, and for task-oriented were 0.686 > 0.5. Fornell-Lacker criterion value (0.828) was more than the correlations with other latent constructs, i.e., 0.811 and 0.831. The Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio (HTMT) value was 0.859 < 0.9, which is acceptable. Cronbach alpha for people-oriented leadership behavior was 0.967 > 0.7, and task-oriented leadership behavior was 0.658 > 0.7. Similarly, the composite reliability (CR) values for people-oriented leadership behavior were 0.970 > 0.7, and task-oriented leadership behavior was 0.963 > 0.7. Thus, the headteachers’ leadership behavior questionnaire (HTLB) was internally consistent, valid, and reliable. The findings of the entire study supported using the headteachers’ leadership behavior questionnaire (HLBQ) to explore and measure the leadership behavior of the headteachers.  ","PeriodicalId":370479,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Info","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management Info","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31580/jmi.v9i2.2656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The leadership behavior of the headteachers is associated with institutional worth. This study intended to develop and validate a headteachers’ leadership behavior questionnaire (HLBQ) to measure the leadership behavior of headteachers. The questionnaire encompassed two sub-dimensions viz: people-oriented leadership behavior and task-oriented leadership behavior as per Blake and Mouton’s Managerial Grid. After a rigorous literature review followed by focus group discussions, the preliminary draft of the tool encompassed forty-three (43) items on the five (5) points Likert Scale. Based on the content and face validity, the items with CVR values less than 0.42 were dropped. The revised questionnaire was pilot tested on three hundred and ten (310) public secondary school teachers employed in the school education department. The data were processed through Smart PLS version 4, which provided the questionnaire’s validity, reliability, and model fit. After deleting the unfit items, the questionnaire was further reduced to thirty-one (31) items. AVE values of the items related to people-oriented leadership behavior were 0.658 > 0.5, and for task-oriented were 0.686 > 0.5. Fornell-Lacker criterion value (0.828) was more than the correlations with other latent constructs, i.e., 0.811 and 0.831. The Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio (HTMT) value was 0.859 < 0.9, which is acceptable. Cronbach alpha for people-oriented leadership behavior was 0.967 > 0.7, and task-oriented leadership behavior was 0.658 > 0.7. Similarly, the composite reliability (CR) values for people-oriented leadership behavior were 0.970 > 0.7, and task-oriented leadership behavior was 0.963 > 0.7. Thus, the headteachers’ leadership behavior questionnaire (HTLB) was internally consistent, valid, and reliable. The findings of the entire study supported using the headteachers’ leadership behavior questionnaire (HLBQ) to explore and measure the leadership behavior of the headteachers.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
校长领导行为问卷(HLBQ)编制与验证
校长的领导行为与制度价值有关。本研究拟编制并验证一份校长领导行为问卷(HLBQ),以衡量校长的领导行为。问卷包含两个子维度,即:以人为本的领导行为和任务导向的领导行为,根据布莱克和穆顿的管理网格。经过严格的文献审查和焦点小组讨论,该工具的初步草案包括五(5)点李克特量表上的43(43)个项目。基于内容和面效度,CVR值小于0.42的条目被丢弃。修订后的问卷在学校教育部门雇用的310名公立中学教师中进行了试点测试。数据通过Smart PLS version 4进行处理,提供了问卷的效度、信度和模型拟合。在删除不适合的项目后,问卷进一步减少到31个项目。以人为本的领导行为相关项AVE值为0.658 > 0.5,任务导向的领导行为AVE值为0.686 > 0.5。Fornell-Lacker判据值(0.828)高于其他潜在构念(0.811和0.831)。单性状比(HTMT)值为0.859 < 0.9,可以接受。以人为本的领导行为的Cronbach alpha值为0.967 > 0.7,任务导向的领导行为的Cronbach alpha值为0.658 > 0.7。同样,以人为本的领导行为的复合信度(CR)值为0.970 > 0.7,任务导向的领导行为的复合信度(CR)值为0.963 > 0.7。因此,班主任领导行为问卷具有内部一致性、效度和信度。整个研究的结果支持使用校长领导行为问卷(HLBQ)来探索和测量校长的领导行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Factors influencing academic dishonesty among undergraduate students in higher education institutions (HEIs) in Malaysia From hidden to unhidden: Triple bottom line through the lens of human resources Effects of coronavirus on world economy: Socio-psychological perspective Formalizing the Informal Sector: Issues, Challenges, and Opportunities A systematic review guanxi HRM practices, formal HRM practices to improve creative performance in collectivism organization culture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1