A TEACHING FOCUSSED ACADEMIC: PIONEER OR PATSY?

Patricia Arthur
{"title":"A TEACHING FOCUSSED ACADEMIC: PIONEER OR PATSY?","authors":"Patricia Arthur","doi":"10.33422/icreconf.2019.04.220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The University of New South Wales has earmarked the building of educational excellence in the university community as a priority in its 2025 strategy. (https://www.2025.unsw.edu.au/). The 2025 Strategy recognises that, in the current climate of intense competition to attract students, providing ‘educational excellence’ as the foundational student experience needed to be prioritized. UNSW plans to have approximately 25% of staff in EF roles and the first cohort or 157 academics has been functioning in this capacity for approximately 18 months. Enormous has been expended in creating these positions from within the existing framework of a traditional, research intensive, academic environment. The EF role is not the creation of UNSW, but specific features of this role, that may have been problematic for other institutions, have been specifically addressed: namely promotion, workload and potential reversion to teaching/research roles. A survey was framed using the FAQs that emerged following early discussions of EF roles within the academic community. The original cohort was asked it if their overall experience matched their expectations as per the FAQs. Preliminary results indicate that, while 100% of respondents who had applied for promotion were successful and 100% do not regret their decision to become an EF academic, there remain concerns about increased workload, unclear/unfair performance metrics and the ability to revert to a teaching/research position if desired.","PeriodicalId":141892,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of The International Conference on Research in Education","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of The International Conference on Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/icreconf.2019.04.220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The University of New South Wales has earmarked the building of educational excellence in the university community as a priority in its 2025 strategy. (https://www.2025.unsw.edu.au/). The 2025 Strategy recognises that, in the current climate of intense competition to attract students, providing ‘educational excellence’ as the foundational student experience needed to be prioritized. UNSW plans to have approximately 25% of staff in EF roles and the first cohort or 157 academics has been functioning in this capacity for approximately 18 months. Enormous has been expended in creating these positions from within the existing framework of a traditional, research intensive, academic environment. The EF role is not the creation of UNSW, but specific features of this role, that may have been problematic for other institutions, have been specifically addressed: namely promotion, workload and potential reversion to teaching/research roles. A survey was framed using the FAQs that emerged following early discussions of EF roles within the academic community. The original cohort was asked it if their overall experience matched their expectations as per the FAQs. Preliminary results indicate that, while 100% of respondents who had applied for promotion were successful and 100% do not regret their decision to become an EF academic, there remain concerns about increased workload, unclear/unfair performance metrics and the ability to revert to a teaching/research position if desired.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以教学为中心的学者:先锋还是替罪羊?
新南威尔士大学在其2025年战略中将大学社区的卓越教育建设列为优先事项。(https://www.2025.unsw.edu.au/)。“2025战略”认识到,在当前吸引学生的激烈竞争环境下,提供“卓越教育”作为基础学生体验需要优先考虑。新南威尔士大学计划让大约25%的员工担任EF职位,第一批157名学者已经在这一职位上工作了大约18个月。在传统的、研究密集型的、学术环境的现有框架内,创造这些职位已经花费了巨大的资金。EF的角色并不是新南威尔士大学创设的,但是这个角色的特定特征,对于其他机构来说可能是有问题的,已经得到了具体的解决:即晋升、工作量和可能回归到教学/研究角色。一项调查是根据学术界早期讨论EF角色后出现的常见问题进行的。最初的队列被问及他们的总体体验是否符合他们的期望。初步结果表明,虽然100%申请晋升的受访者都成功了,而且100%的受访者都不后悔自己成为英孚学术人员的决定,但仍然存在工作量增加、绩效指标不明确/不公平以及如果愿意,是否有能力恢复到教学/研究职位的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Peer Learning Communities in Developing a Model of School Health Education Multimodal and Multisensory Approach to Teaching and Learning Vocabulary Using Structural Equation Modelling to study the influence of perceived usefulness and perceived compatibility on students’ attitudes towards using IPAD Methods for Developing Well being in Learning Mathematics WHAT IS PROPORTIONAL REASONING?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1