Applying Analytical Hierarchy Process to Evaluate Adult Occupant Protection on Body Region in ASEAN NCAP Offset Frontal Test Domain

H. A. Aziz, E. H. Sukadarin, N. S. Suhaimi, H. Osman, M. Noordin, I. Shafiee
{"title":"Applying Analytical Hierarchy Process to Evaluate Adult Occupant Protection on Body Region in ASEAN NCAP Offset Frontal Test Domain","authors":"H. A. Aziz, E. H. Sukadarin, N. S. Suhaimi, H. Osman, M. Noordin, I. Shafiee","doi":"10.56381/jsaem.v2i3.93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nAdult Occupant Protection (AOP) is a vital area of evaluation in all New Car Assessment Programs (NCAPs) around the globe. The primary objective of these new car assessment programs is to reduce road deaths by focusing on vehicle (pre-crash) safety features. Starting from the year 2017 until 2020, a single rating system has been introduced whereby AOP contributes 50% to the overall rating with a maximum of 36 points; split into three main domains including offset frontal test (OFT), side impact test (SIT) and head protection technology (HPT). However, the extent of OFT protection to car drivers and passengers during a collision still needs to be explored. Therefore, in this study, an evaluation of body region injury due to AOP failure in frontal crash is conducted to validate and support NCAP rating. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is put forward on the basis of expert's input from various related fields to evaluate the injury to body regions and OFT protection during an accident based on the current situation. The results show that head, neck and chest indicated the highest severity, followed by knee, femur and lower leg with respect to the Consistency Ratio (CR) of 0.0633. This was in line with the focus of ASEAN NCAP's AOP protocol whereby the three body regions were deemed as the critical parts and required sufficient protection. Based on the findings, it is proven that ASEAN NCAP's consideration of OFT in AOP is well developed and suits the current needs. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":286928,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society of Automotive Engineers Malaysia","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society of Automotive Engineers Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56381/jsaem.v2i3.93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Adult Occupant Protection (AOP) is a vital area of evaluation in all New Car Assessment Programs (NCAPs) around the globe. The primary objective of these new car assessment programs is to reduce road deaths by focusing on vehicle (pre-crash) safety features. Starting from the year 2017 until 2020, a single rating system has been introduced whereby AOP contributes 50% to the overall rating with a maximum of 36 points; split into three main domains including offset frontal test (OFT), side impact test (SIT) and head protection technology (HPT). However, the extent of OFT protection to car drivers and passengers during a collision still needs to be explored. Therefore, in this study, an evaluation of body region injury due to AOP failure in frontal crash is conducted to validate and support NCAP rating. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is put forward on the basis of expert's input from various related fields to evaluate the injury to body regions and OFT protection during an accident based on the current situation. The results show that head, neck and chest indicated the highest severity, followed by knee, femur and lower leg with respect to the Consistency Ratio (CR) of 0.0633. This was in line with the focus of ASEAN NCAP's AOP protocol whereby the three body regions were deemed as the critical parts and required sufficient protection. Based on the findings, it is proven that ASEAN NCAP's consideration of OFT in AOP is well developed and suits the current needs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用层次分析法评价东盟NCAP偏置正面测试域成人乘员身体区域防护
成人乘员保护(AOP)是全球所有新车评估项目(ncap)评估的一个重要领域。这些新的汽车评估计划的主要目标是通过关注车辆(碰撞前)安全特性来减少道路死亡。从2017年开始到2020年,引入了一个单一的评级系统,其中AOP贡献50%的整体评级,最高36分;测试分为三个主要领域,包括偏置正面测试(OFT)、侧面碰撞测试(SIT)和头部保护技术(HPT)。然而,在碰撞过程中,OFT对汽车驾驶员和乘客的保护程度仍有待探索。因此,本研究对正面碰撞中AOP失效导致的身体区域损伤进行评估,以验证和支持NCAP评级。在听取相关领域专家意见的基础上,提出了基于现状的层次分析法(AHP),对事故中人体部位损伤及OFT防护进行评估。结果表明,头部、颈部和胸部是最严重的部位,其次是膝盖、股骨和小腿,一致性比(CR)为0.0633。这符合东盟NCAP AOP协议的重点,其中三个机构区域被视为关键部分,需要充分的保护。在此基础上,证明了东盟NCAP在AOP中对OFT的考虑是成熟的,符合当前的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sustainable Township and Sustainable Home: Public Perceptions A Systematic Review on the Autonomous Emergency Steering Assessments and Tests Methodology in ASEAN Evaluation of SUV Roof Crush Analysis using Alternative Non-Linear Structural Analysis Solver The Influence of Socio-demographics Background on the Driving Behavior: A Short Review Establishment of 3D-printed Child Manikins Using Anthropometric Data of 6- and 10-year-old ASEAN Children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1