Utilization of antenatal, delivery and postnatal care services in primary healthcare centres in selected rural communities in Delta State, Southern Nigeria.

R. Ahuru, Ada M Anyiwe, CHIMEZIE IGWEGBE NZOPUTAM
{"title":"Utilization of antenatal, delivery and postnatal care services in primary healthcare centres in selected rural communities in Delta State, Southern Nigeria.","authors":"R. Ahuru, Ada M Anyiwe, CHIMEZIE IGWEGBE NZOPUTAM","doi":"10.46829/HSIJOURNAL.2020.12.1.2.105-113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In Nigeria, there is a dearth of evidence on predictors of maternal care utilization in primary healthcare centres (PHCs).\nObjective: In this study, we examined the predictors of antenatal care (ANC), delivery care, and postnatal care (PNC) utilization in PHCs in four rural communities in Ughelli North Local Government Area in Delta State, Southern Nigeria.\nMethods: We performed a cross-sectional household survey which used a pretested structured questionnaire to elicit information from 380 women within the reproductive ages in their homes. Descriptive and predictive analyses were undertaken to assess the prevalence of ANC, delivery care, and PNC in PHCs. The odds for utilizing the three indicators were estimated using multivariate logistic regression. \nResults: The data revealed that 72.96% (n = 224/380) of the women utilized ANC in PHCs. Among women who reported recent birth, 56.34% (n = 191/339) delivered in PHCs, 4.72% (n = 87/339) in other government hospitals, 13.27% (n = 445/339) in private hospitals and 25.66% (n =87/339) delivered either at home or in the homes of Traditional Birth Attendants. Also, 64.24% (n = 106/339) of women who reported recent birth use PHC for PNC. Women who required to walk for 30 -59 min and ≥ 60 min to the nearest healthcare centre were, respectively, 56% [Odds ratio (OR) = 0.44; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0. 18 -1.04] and (OR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.19 -0.72) significantly less likely to use PHC for ANC. Those who had primary educational qualification (OR = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.19 –9.76) and at least secondary educational qualifications (OR = 0.43;95% CI: 0.20-1.18) were respectively 64% and 57% significantly less likely to use PHC for delivery care. Attending ANC in PHCs significantly increases the chances of using PHC for both delivery care (OR = 10.52;95% CI: 5.94 -18.61), and PNC (OR = 2.11; 95% CI: 0.99-4.53). Also, using PHC for delivery care (OR = 11.72; 95% CI: 5.14-26.69) is associated with 1,072% increase in the odds to use PHCs for PNC.\nConclusion: The study concluded that the rate at which women in the study area deliver at home is high despite proximity to PHCs. Also, the use of PHCs for a lower level of care influences its usage for a higher level of care. The study among other things recommends that quality of care rendered in PHCs should be upgraded and more PHCs should be sited in the study area.","PeriodicalId":276774,"journal":{"name":"Second Edition in 2020 of the HSI Journal Volume 1 Issue 2 Publication","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Second Edition in 2020 of the HSI Journal Volume 1 Issue 2 Publication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46829/HSIJOURNAL.2020.12.1.2.105-113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: In Nigeria, there is a dearth of evidence on predictors of maternal care utilization in primary healthcare centres (PHCs). Objective: In this study, we examined the predictors of antenatal care (ANC), delivery care, and postnatal care (PNC) utilization in PHCs in four rural communities in Ughelli North Local Government Area in Delta State, Southern Nigeria. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional household survey which used a pretested structured questionnaire to elicit information from 380 women within the reproductive ages in their homes. Descriptive and predictive analyses were undertaken to assess the prevalence of ANC, delivery care, and PNC in PHCs. The odds for utilizing the three indicators were estimated using multivariate logistic regression. Results: The data revealed that 72.96% (n = 224/380) of the women utilized ANC in PHCs. Among women who reported recent birth, 56.34% (n = 191/339) delivered in PHCs, 4.72% (n = 87/339) in other government hospitals, 13.27% (n = 445/339) in private hospitals and 25.66% (n =87/339) delivered either at home or in the homes of Traditional Birth Attendants. Also, 64.24% (n = 106/339) of women who reported recent birth use PHC for PNC. Women who required to walk for 30 -59 min and ≥ 60 min to the nearest healthcare centre were, respectively, 56% [Odds ratio (OR) = 0.44; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0. 18 -1.04] and (OR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.19 -0.72) significantly less likely to use PHC for ANC. Those who had primary educational qualification (OR = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.19 –9.76) and at least secondary educational qualifications (OR = 0.43;95% CI: 0.20-1.18) were respectively 64% and 57% significantly less likely to use PHC for delivery care. Attending ANC in PHCs significantly increases the chances of using PHC for both delivery care (OR = 10.52;95% CI: 5.94 -18.61), and PNC (OR = 2.11; 95% CI: 0.99-4.53). Also, using PHC for delivery care (OR = 11.72; 95% CI: 5.14-26.69) is associated with 1,072% increase in the odds to use PHCs for PNC. Conclusion: The study concluded that the rate at which women in the study area deliver at home is high despite proximity to PHCs. Also, the use of PHCs for a lower level of care influences its usage for a higher level of care. The study among other things recommends that quality of care rendered in PHCs should be upgraded and more PHCs should be sited in the study area.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在尼日利亚南部三角洲州选定农村社区的初级保健中心利用产前、分娩和产后护理服务。
背景:在尼日利亚,缺乏关于初级保健中心(PHCs)孕产妇保健利用的预测指标的证据。目的:在本研究中,我们研究了尼日利亚南部三角洲州Ughelli北部地方政府区四个农村社区初级保健医院产前护理(ANC)、分娩护理和产后护理(PNC)利用的预测因素。方法:我们进行了一项横断面家庭调查,使用预先测试的结构化问卷,从家中的380名育龄妇女中获取信息。进行了描述性和预测性分析,以评估初级保健国家中ANC、分娩护理和PNC的患病率。利用这三个指标的几率是用多元逻辑回归估计的。结果:数据显示,72.96% (n = 224/380)的妇女在初级保健医院使用了ANC。在报告最近分娩的妇女中,56.34% (n = 191/339)在初级保健医院分娩,4.72% (n =87/339)在其他政府医院分娩,13.27% (n = 445/339)在私立医院分娩,25.66% (n =87/339)在家中或在传统助产士家中分娩。此外,64.24% (n = 106/339)报告最近分娩的妇女使用PHC进行PNC。需要步行30 -59分钟和≥60分钟到最近的医疗中心的妇女分别为56%[优势比(OR) = 0.44;95%置信区间(CI): 0。18 -1.04]和(OR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.19 -0.72)使用PHC治疗ANC的可能性显著降低。初等教育学历(OR = 0.36;95% CI: 0.19 -9.76)和至少中等教育学历(OR = 0.43;95% CI: 0.20-1.18)的妇女使用初级保健服务的可能性分别显著降低64%和57%。在初级保健中心参加ANC显著增加了在分娩护理中使用初级保健中心(OR = 10.52;95% CI: 5.94 -18.61)和PNC (OR = 2.11;95% ci: 0.99-4.53)。此外,使用PHC进行分娩护理(OR = 11.72;95% CI: 5.14-26.69)与使用PHCs治疗PNC的几率增加1072%相关。结论:该研究得出结论,尽管靠近初级保健中心,但研究地区妇女在家分娩的比率很高。此外,初级保健在较低水平护理中的使用影响了其在较高水平护理中的使用。除其他事项外,该研究建议提高初级保健中心的护理质量,并在研究区域内设立更多初级保健中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Complementary and alternative medicine use among hypertensive patients receiving biomedical treatment: a cross-sectional survey at the LEKMA General Hospital in Accra, Ghana. Clinical presentations and patterns of neuro-developmental disorders in a health facility in Ghana: implications for the health and educational sectors Complete surgical excision of cor triatriatum sinistrum Antinociceptive effects of an ethanolic extract of Desmodium adscendens: possible involvement of opioidergic, adrenergic, potassium channels and serotoninergic pathways Utilization of antenatal, delivery and postnatal care services in primary healthcare centres in selected rural communities in Delta State, Southern Nigeria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1