Investigating the Moderating Role of Positive Intergroup Contact on the Association Between Authoritarianism and Homophobia Among Heterosexual Young Adults

Aleyna Şahin, Bekir Sari, Bedel Güler, S. Çoksan
{"title":"Investigating the Moderating Role of Positive Intergroup Contact on the Association Between Authoritarianism and Homophobia Among Heterosexual Young Adults","authors":"Aleyna Şahin, Bekir Sari, Bedel Güler, S. Çoksan","doi":"10.30613/curesosc.1162897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Authoritarian personality traits are associated with compliance and obedience to prevailing social norms and values. In contexts where the political climate fuels homophobia, people with authoritarian personality traits display more homophobic attitudes and behaviors. On the other hand, positive intergroup contact can reduce problems between groups. This positive intergroup contact, which emphasizes similarities by weakening baseless information about the outgroup, has long been used to reduce intergroup conflicts. In a heterogeneous sample, whether positive intergroup contact will have a moderating role in the relationship between authoritarianism and homophobia is an open question. To answer this question, 241 young adults (Mage = 20.0, SD = 2.04; 59.3% female, 40.7% male) from 47 different cities of Türkiye were reached. Participants completed the right-wing authoritarianism scale, the social contact form with sexual minorities, and the Hudson & Ricketts homophobia scale. In parallel with the hypotheses, the findings show that authoritarian personality score positively predicted homophobia (β = .49, SE = .05, z = 10.07, p < .001), while it negatively predicted homophobia (β = -.66, SE = .08, z = -8.67, p < .001). However, contrary to the hypothesis, no moderating role of positive intergroup contact in the association between authoritarianism and homophobia was observed (β = -.03, SE = .05, z = -.53 p = .593). Simple slope analyzes showed that authoritarianism positively predicted homophobia at both high and low levels of positive intergroup contact. The findings are discussed in the context of intergroup contact theory.","PeriodicalId":344498,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Social Sciences","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30613/curesosc.1162897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Authoritarian personality traits are associated with compliance and obedience to prevailing social norms and values. In contexts where the political climate fuels homophobia, people with authoritarian personality traits display more homophobic attitudes and behaviors. On the other hand, positive intergroup contact can reduce problems between groups. This positive intergroup contact, which emphasizes similarities by weakening baseless information about the outgroup, has long been used to reduce intergroup conflicts. In a heterogeneous sample, whether positive intergroup contact will have a moderating role in the relationship between authoritarianism and homophobia is an open question. To answer this question, 241 young adults (Mage = 20.0, SD = 2.04; 59.3% female, 40.7% male) from 47 different cities of Türkiye were reached. Participants completed the right-wing authoritarianism scale, the social contact form with sexual minorities, and the Hudson & Ricketts homophobia scale. In parallel with the hypotheses, the findings show that authoritarian personality score positively predicted homophobia (β = .49, SE = .05, z = 10.07, p < .001), while it negatively predicted homophobia (β = -.66, SE = .08, z = -8.67, p < .001). However, contrary to the hypothesis, no moderating role of positive intergroup contact in the association between authoritarianism and homophobia was observed (β = -.03, SE = .05, z = -.53 p = .593). Simple slope analyzes showed that authoritarianism positively predicted homophobia at both high and low levels of positive intergroup contact. The findings are discussed in the context of intergroup contact theory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
异性恋青年权威主义与同性恋恐惧症之间正向群体接触的调节作用
专制人格特征与顺从和服从主流社会规范和价值观有关。在政治气候助长恐同的背景下,具有专制人格特征的人表现出更多的恐同态度和行为。另一方面,积极的群体间接触可以减少群体之间的问题。这种积极的群体间接触,通过弱化关于外群体的毫无根据的信息来强调相似性,长期以来一直被用来减少群体间的冲突。在一个异质样本中,积极的群体间接触是否会在威权主义和同性恋恐惧症之间的关系中起到调节作用,这是一个悬而未决的问题。为了回答这个问题,241名年轻人(Mage = 20.0, SD = 2.04;调查对象为来自全国47个城市(女性59.3%,男性40.7%)。参与者完成了右翼权威主义量表、与性少数群体的社会接触表格,以及哈德逊和里基茨同性恋恐惧症量表。与上述假设相一致的是,专制人格得分对同性恋恐惧症有正向预测(β = .49, SE = .05, z = 10.07, p < .001),对同性恋恐惧症有负向预测(β = -)。66, SE = .08, z = -8.67, p < .001)。然而,与假设相反,没有观察到积极的群体间接触在威权主义和同性恋恐惧症之间的关联中起调节作用(β = -)。03, SE = .05, z = -。53 p = .593)。简单的斜率分析表明,威权主义在高水平和低水平的群体间积极接触中都能积极预测同性恋恐惧症。研究结果在群体间接触理论的背景下进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
(Dis)utopian Landscapes: Baudrillard, Deleuze, and DeLillo ÇOCUKLUK ÇAĞI TRAVMALARI İLE ROMANTİK İLİŞKİDE İSTİSMARA MARUZİYET ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE BORDERLİNE KİŞİLİK ÖZELLİKLERİ VE AYRILIK ANKSİYETESİNİN ARACI ROLÜ The Pied Piper as a Killer in 21st Century London: China Miéville’s King Rat Classroom Emotional Climate and School Burnout in Secondary School Students: A Hierarchical Regression Model Examination of the psychological effects of Covid 19 on university students in Turkey one year later from the pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1