D. Schossler, C. Nabinger, C. Ribeiro, P. Boggiano, M. Cadenazzi, Diana L. Restrepo-Osorio
{"title":"Applying a participatory methodology to evaluate ecosystem services in the Pampa biome: lessons learned from the Tessa methodology in Uruguay","authors":"D. Schossler, C. Nabinger, C. Ribeiro, P. Boggiano, M. Cadenazzi, Diana L. Restrepo-Osorio","doi":"10.18472/sustdeb.v12n1.2021.38175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Identifying and measuring ecosystem services involving local stakeholders has been characterised as a novel approach in the literature. This article describes the methodology used in the participatory workshops, the lessons learned, and the specific results of applying the Tessa method. The methodology was piloted with 56 researchers and technicians, more than 22 institutions, and 54 livestock producers involved with the grassland conservation initiative, Alianza del Pastizal. Identified change agents with the most significant impact include the absence of a rural workforce, the lack of family succession, and weeding and overgrazing of grasslands. The primary ecosystem services identified included the production of fodder, meat/wool, wildlife forage, way of life/culture, and medicinal plants. The methodology presented here is replicable, capable of expansion to more groups, contributes to a better understanding, by the producers, of their problems and points to the need for the development of public incentive policies.","PeriodicalId":146126,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability in Debate","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability in Debate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18472/sustdeb.v12n1.2021.38175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Identifying and measuring ecosystem services involving local stakeholders has been characterised as a novel approach in the literature. This article describes the methodology used in the participatory workshops, the lessons learned, and the specific results of applying the Tessa method. The methodology was piloted with 56 researchers and technicians, more than 22 institutions, and 54 livestock producers involved with the grassland conservation initiative, Alianza del Pastizal. Identified change agents with the most significant impact include the absence of a rural workforce, the lack of family succession, and weeding and overgrazing of grasslands. The primary ecosystem services identified included the production of fodder, meat/wool, wildlife forage, way of life/culture, and medicinal plants. The methodology presented here is replicable, capable of expansion to more groups, contributes to a better understanding, by the producers, of their problems and points to the need for the development of public incentive policies.
识别和测量涉及当地利益相关者的生态系统服务在文献中被描述为一种新颖的方法。本文描述了参与性讲习班中使用的方法、吸取的经验教训以及应用Tessa方法的具体结果。参与草原保护倡议“草原联盟”(Alianza del Pastizal)的56名研究人员和技术人员、超过22个机构和54名畜牧生产者试用了该方法。已确定的影响最大的变革因素包括农村劳动力的缺乏、家庭继承的缺乏以及草原的除草和过度放牧。确定的主要生态系统服务包括饲料、肉类/羊毛、野生动物饲料、生活方式/文化和药用植物的生产。这里提出的方法是可复制的,能够推广到更多的群体,有助于生产者更好地了解它们的问题,并指出需要制订公共奖励政策。