Antibaterial activity of the extracts of pineapple and pomelo against five different pathogenic bacterial isolates

Atm Nahid Hasan, T. Saha, T. Ahmed
{"title":"Antibaterial activity of the extracts of pineapple and pomelo against five different pathogenic bacterial isolates","authors":"Atm Nahid Hasan, T. Saha, T. Ahmed","doi":"10.3329/sjm.v11i1.57143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To combat the infections caused by antibiotic resistant bacteria, natural candidates are being studied to find out antibacterial activity against the drug-resistant microorganisms. Among the variety of natural candidates of plant origin, many fruits have been proved to have potent antibacterial activity. In the current study, we chose pineapple (Ananas comosus), and pomelo (Citrus maxima) to determine their efficacy against some clinical isolates. Fruit samples were subjected to prepare crude, ethanol, methanol and aqueous extract to determine their antibacterial potency. Clinical isolates were used to determine the antibacterial activity of the extracts against them. The isolates were found to be multi-drug resistant. Out of twenty-eight antibiotics, Pseudomonas aeruginosa was resistant to ten antibiotics and Salmonella spp. was resistant to nine antibiotics. Rather than the crude extracts of the fruits, ethanol and methanol extracts showed antibacterial activity towards multi-drug resistant pathogenic bacteria. Aqueous extract did not show any significant antibacterial activity at all. Extracts of pomelo fruit exhibited the highest results whereas pomelo skin and pineapple peel crude extracts were the least effective compared to the other extracts. Ethanol extract of pineapple fruit (against all isolates but Staphylococcus aureus) and methanol extract of pomelo fruit (against all isolates) showed the lowest MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) of 187.5 μg/ml. MBC (minimum bactericidal concentration) was found (within the range of 500 μg/ml to 1000 μg/ml) only with ethanol and methanol extracts of pomelo and pineapple. As the clinical isolates were found to be inhibited by the extracts, they can be used as an alternative for treating infections caused by these bacteria.\nStamford Journal of Microbiology, Vol.11 (1) 2021: 1-6","PeriodicalId":170445,"journal":{"name":"Stamford Journal of Microbiology","volume":"125 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stamford Journal of Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/sjm.v11i1.57143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

To combat the infections caused by antibiotic resistant bacteria, natural candidates are being studied to find out antibacterial activity against the drug-resistant microorganisms. Among the variety of natural candidates of plant origin, many fruits have been proved to have potent antibacterial activity. In the current study, we chose pineapple (Ananas comosus), and pomelo (Citrus maxima) to determine their efficacy against some clinical isolates. Fruit samples were subjected to prepare crude, ethanol, methanol and aqueous extract to determine their antibacterial potency. Clinical isolates were used to determine the antibacterial activity of the extracts against them. The isolates were found to be multi-drug resistant. Out of twenty-eight antibiotics, Pseudomonas aeruginosa was resistant to ten antibiotics and Salmonella spp. was resistant to nine antibiotics. Rather than the crude extracts of the fruits, ethanol and methanol extracts showed antibacterial activity towards multi-drug resistant pathogenic bacteria. Aqueous extract did not show any significant antibacterial activity at all. Extracts of pomelo fruit exhibited the highest results whereas pomelo skin and pineapple peel crude extracts were the least effective compared to the other extracts. Ethanol extract of pineapple fruit (against all isolates but Staphylococcus aureus) and methanol extract of pomelo fruit (against all isolates) showed the lowest MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) of 187.5 μg/ml. MBC (minimum bactericidal concentration) was found (within the range of 500 μg/ml to 1000 μg/ml) only with ethanol and methanol extracts of pomelo and pineapple. As the clinical isolates were found to be inhibited by the extracts, they can be used as an alternative for treating infections caused by these bacteria. Stamford Journal of Microbiology, Vol.11 (1) 2021: 1-6
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
菠萝和柚子提取物对5种不同病原菌的抑菌活性
为了对抗由耐药细菌引起的感染,人们正在研究天然候选物,以找出对耐药微生物的抗菌活性。在各种天然候选植物中,许多水果已被证明具有有效的抗菌活性。在本研究中,我们选择菠萝(Ananas comosus)和柚子(Citrus maxima)来测定它们对一些临床分离株的疗效。对水果样品进行粗提物、乙醇、甲醇和水提物的制备,以测定其抑菌效力。采用临床分离株对其进行抑菌活性测定。发现分离株具有多重耐药。其中铜绿假单胞菌对10种抗生素耐药,沙门氏菌对9种抗生素耐药。与果实粗提物相比,乙醇和甲醇提取物对多重耐药病原菌的抑菌活性更强。水提物没有明显的抑菌活性。柚皮和菠萝皮粗提物的效果最差,柚皮和菠萝皮粗提物的效果最好。菠萝果乙醇提取物(对除金黄色葡萄球菌外的所有菌株)和柚果甲醇提取物(对所有菌株)的最低MIC(最低抑制浓度)为187.5 μg/ml。仅柚、菠萝乙醇提取物和甲醇提取物的最低杀菌浓度为500 ~ 1000 μg/ml。由于临床分离物被发现被提取物抑制,它们可以用作治疗这些细菌引起的感染的替代方法。微生物学报,Vol.11 (1) 2021: 1-6
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Incidence of Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria In Fish Sold In Local Market In Dhaka City Isolation of Indigenous Bacillus Spp. From Garden Soil To Decolorize Synthetic Textile Dyes Antibiogram Profiling of Clinical Isolates From Several Renowned Diagnostic Centers In Dhaka City, Bangladesh Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy (Apdt), An Approach To Fightback Against Antibiotic Resistance: A Short Review Mitigation of Heavy Metal Pollution-An Overview Of Microbial Remediation And Prospect In Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1