Investigation of the Effects of Rice Husk and Rice Straw on the Properties of Lightweight Fibrecrete Blocks

Abaza Leo, Kyakula Michael
{"title":"Investigation of the Effects of Rice Husk and Rice Straw on the Properties of Lightweight Fibrecrete Blocks","authors":"Abaza Leo, Kyakula Michael","doi":"10.11648/J.JCCEE.20210605.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Uganda’s progress towards achieving sustainable growth is curtailed by poor and limited infrastructure, over 60% of the urban population live in slums with poor quality housing and hygiene, 44% of the households sleep in one room, the situation is more critical in Kampala where about 70% sleep in one room. About 67% of Ugandans live in dwellings with brick walls while 28% live in dwellings of mud walls reinforced with timber poles. Over 90% of framed structure in Uganda are built from reinforced concrete structures with bricks or block infill walls that are heavy thus influencing the type and size of structural members hence its cost. This research focused on use of Rice Husks (RH) and Rice Straws (RS) in lightweight fibrecrete blocks for benefit of their reduced weight, reducing environmental pollution, low processing energy, and availability at modest cost. In this research, the fibres were alkali-treated using sodium hydroxide solution prepared by dissolving 15g of sodium hydroxide pellets in 1 liter of water heated at 100°C for 60 minutes. This was aimed at increasing surface roughness, expose cellulose to fibre surface, improve fibre/matrix adhesion, eliminate weak boundary layers and remove superficial lignin layer. The alkali treated fibres were used to prepare one hundred twenty one (121) fibrecrete blocks of RH and RS with varying proportions of 0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% fibre and tested for their density, compressive strength, water absorption, thermal conductivity, fire resistances and microstructure. The densities of lightweight fibrecrete blocks ranged between 1947-1485kg/m3 with a reduction of 7.9 - 30.5% compared to aggregate blocks of 2138kg/m3 density. Compressive strength of the blocks varied between 1.53 - 5.36 N/mm2 and 1.28 - 3.48 N/mm2 for RH and RS blocks respectively with control block having compressive strength of 7.2N/mm2 at 28 days. Compressive strength loss in the lightweight fibrecrete blocks tested for fire resistance ranged between 10.7- 34.3% and 6.8-73.7% for RH and RS-blocks respectively while the water absorption ranged between 5.8-7.8% for RH and 6.4-11.3% for RS blocks and 3.6% for aggregate blocks. Thermal conductivity was improved by 13.4-64.8%. The researcher concluded that, RH-40 and RS-20 blocks have the most appropriate proportions for lightweight fibrecrete blocks. This would reduce Environmental degradation, utilize agricultural waste, increase the income of the farmers, reduce construction cost due to reduced density of fibrecrete blocks, and increase thermal insulation hence thermal comfort of the occupants.","PeriodicalId":262934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.JCCEE.20210605.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Uganda’s progress towards achieving sustainable growth is curtailed by poor and limited infrastructure, over 60% of the urban population live in slums with poor quality housing and hygiene, 44% of the households sleep in one room, the situation is more critical in Kampala where about 70% sleep in one room. About 67% of Ugandans live in dwellings with brick walls while 28% live in dwellings of mud walls reinforced with timber poles. Over 90% of framed structure in Uganda are built from reinforced concrete structures with bricks or block infill walls that are heavy thus influencing the type and size of structural members hence its cost. This research focused on use of Rice Husks (RH) and Rice Straws (RS) in lightweight fibrecrete blocks for benefit of their reduced weight, reducing environmental pollution, low processing energy, and availability at modest cost. In this research, the fibres were alkali-treated using sodium hydroxide solution prepared by dissolving 15g of sodium hydroxide pellets in 1 liter of water heated at 100°C for 60 minutes. This was aimed at increasing surface roughness, expose cellulose to fibre surface, improve fibre/matrix adhesion, eliminate weak boundary layers and remove superficial lignin layer. The alkali treated fibres were used to prepare one hundred twenty one (121) fibrecrete blocks of RH and RS with varying proportions of 0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% fibre and tested for their density, compressive strength, water absorption, thermal conductivity, fire resistances and microstructure. The densities of lightweight fibrecrete blocks ranged between 1947-1485kg/m3 with a reduction of 7.9 - 30.5% compared to aggregate blocks of 2138kg/m3 density. Compressive strength of the blocks varied between 1.53 - 5.36 N/mm2 and 1.28 - 3.48 N/mm2 for RH and RS blocks respectively with control block having compressive strength of 7.2N/mm2 at 28 days. Compressive strength loss in the lightweight fibrecrete blocks tested for fire resistance ranged between 10.7- 34.3% and 6.8-73.7% for RH and RS-blocks respectively while the water absorption ranged between 5.8-7.8% for RH and 6.4-11.3% for RS blocks and 3.6% for aggregate blocks. Thermal conductivity was improved by 13.4-64.8%. The researcher concluded that, RH-40 and RS-20 blocks have the most appropriate proportions for lightweight fibrecrete blocks. This would reduce Environmental degradation, utilize agricultural waste, increase the income of the farmers, reduce construction cost due to reduced density of fibrecrete blocks, and increase thermal insulation hence thermal comfort of the occupants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
稻壳和稻草对轻质纤维块材性能影响的研究
乌干达在实现可持续增长方面的进展受到基础设施薄弱和有限的制约,60%以上的城市人口生活在住房质量和卫生条件差的贫民窟,44%的家庭睡在一个房间里,坎帕拉的情况更为严重,约70%的家庭睡在一个房间里。大约67%的乌干达人住在砖墙的房子里,28%的人住在用木杆加固的泥墙房子里。乌干达90%以上的框架结构由钢筋混凝土结构和砖或砌块填充墙建造而成,这些墙很重,因此影响了结构构件的类型和尺寸,从而影响了成本。本研究的重点是在轻质纤维块中使用稻壳(RH)和稻秆(RS),以减轻重量,减少环境污染,降低加工能耗,并以适度的成本获得。在本研究中,使用氢氧化钠溶液对纤维进行碱处理,氢氧化钠溶液由15g氢氧化钠颗粒溶解在1升100℃加热60分钟的水中制备。这是为了增加表面粗糙度,纤维素暴露在纤维表面,改善纤维/基质粘附,消除弱边界层和去除表面木质素层。将碱处理后的纤维分别以0%、10%、20%、30%、40%和50%的纤维比例制备了121种RH和RS纤维块,并对其密度、抗压强度、吸水率、导热系数、耐火性能和微观结构进行了测试。轻质纤维砌块的密度在1947-1485kg/m3之间,与密度为2138kg/m3的骨料砌块相比,减少了7.9 - 30.5%。RH和RS块的抗压强度分别为1.53 ~ 5.36 N/mm2和1.28 ~ 3.48 N/mm2,对照组块28天抗压强度为7.2N/mm2。轻质纤维砌块的抗压强度损失在RH和RS砌块的防火性能测试中分别为10.7- 34.3%和6.8-73.7%,吸水率在RH和RS砌块的5.8-7.8%和6.4-11.3%之间,骨料砌块的吸水率为3.6%。导热系数提高13.4 ~ 64.8%。研究人员得出结论,RH-40和RS-20砌块是轻质纤维砌块最合适的比例。这将减少环境恶化,利用农业废弃物,增加农民的收入,减少纤维块密度,降低建筑成本,增加隔热,从而使居住者热舒适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of the Discrete Element Method to Landslides Reuse of Drill Cuttings Contaminated with Diesel in the Formation of Asphalt Pavement Effect of Crude Oil Contamination on Compaction and Consistency of Some Clay Soils from Parts of Yenagoa, Bayelsa State, Nigeria Impact of Vibrations on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Concrete: Case Study of Constructions in the City of Douala Cameroon Impact of Vibrations on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Concrete: Case Study of Constructions in the City of Douala Cameroon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1