A Study on the Discussion Method of Classics Reading : Based on 〈Masterpiece Reading〉 learners’ perception analysis

Yeonjung Lim
{"title":"A Study on the Discussion Method of Classics Reading\n: Based on 〈Masterpiece Reading〉 learners’ perception analysis","authors":"Yeonjung Lim","doi":"10.46392/kjge.2023.17.4.85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to investigate discussion methods applicable to classical reading courses based on learner perception analysis. In recent years, the rapid spread of artificial intelligence has increased the demand for human thinking and creativity. Discussion is a teaching method that can effectively strengthen these abilities, and it is necessary to strengthen research on specific applications in university education in the future. Therefore, this study examined whether there is a difference in students' perceptions of the class and the improvement of core competencies according to the difference in discussion methods. The results showed that students who held group discussions had higher mean scores regarding lesson design, classroom activities, feedback and communication, achievement, and satisfaction as opposed to students who only held bulletin board discussions. In addition, both groups were most positive about improving their articulation competencies, while students who participated in bulletin board discussions were more positive about improving their self-management competencies. Also, students who participated in group discussions were more positive about improving their dedication and universal value competencies. We hope that this study will be helpful in designing and implementing discussion methods in future classical reading courses.","PeriodicalId":267224,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Association of General Education","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Association of General Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46392/kjge.2023.17.4.85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to investigate discussion methods applicable to classical reading courses based on learner perception analysis. In recent years, the rapid spread of artificial intelligence has increased the demand for human thinking and creativity. Discussion is a teaching method that can effectively strengthen these abilities, and it is necessary to strengthen research on specific applications in university education in the future. Therefore, this study examined whether there is a difference in students' perceptions of the class and the improvement of core competencies according to the difference in discussion methods. The results showed that students who held group discussions had higher mean scores regarding lesson design, classroom activities, feedback and communication, achievement, and satisfaction as opposed to students who only held bulletin board discussions. In addition, both groups were most positive about improving their articulation competencies, while students who participated in bulletin board discussions were more positive about improving their self-management competencies. Also, students who participated in group discussions were more positive about improving their dedication and universal value competencies. We hope that this study will be helpful in designing and implementing discussion methods in future classical reading courses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经典阅读的讨论方法研究——基于《名著阅读》学习者的感知分析
本研究旨在探讨基于学习者感知分析的经典阅读课讨论方法。近年来,人工智能的迅速普及增加了对人类思维和创造力的需求。讨论式是一种能够有效增强这些能力的教学方法,今后在大学教育中加强具体应用的研究是十分必要的。因此,本研究根据讨论方式的不同来考察学生对课堂的认知和核心能力的提升是否存在差异。结果表明,与只进行公告栏讨论的学生相比,进行小组讨论的学生在课程设计、课堂活动、反馈和交流、成就和满意度方面的平均得分更高。此外,两组学生对提高自己的表达能力最为积极,而参与公告栏讨论的学生对提高自我管理能力更为积极。此外,参与小组讨论的学生对提高自己的奉献精神和普世价值能力更为积极。希望本研究能对今后经典阅读课讨论方式的设计与实施有所帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study on Reading Programs in the Convergence Era : Focusing on Book-trailer Activities Liberal Arts Education in the Anthropocene and the PBL Living Lab : Focusing on Korea University's Core Liberal Arts Course LIBERTY JUSTICE TRUTH Ⅱ Posthumanitas : Civilization's Transition and a New Understanding of Humanity Exploring Topics in Domestic Research on Machine Translation through Text Mining A Study on the Competence-based General Education and the Development of Convergent Thinking : Focusing on the Analysis of the Learner Centered Teaching-learning Practices Using Poster Presentations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1