Comparing the Effects of Choline with Clozapine and Fluoxetine for Improving Cognitive Behavior in Rats

{"title":"Comparing the Effects of Choline with Clozapine and Fluoxetine for Improving Cognitive Behavior in Rats","authors":"","doi":"10.36283/pjmd11-1/006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\nBackground: Cognitive behavior therapy is an important treatment for various psychiatric and psychological problems. Different psychotherapeutic treatments are used for improvement in patients. The study aimed to compare Clozapine and Fluoxetine with Choline on the progress of cognition and cognitive behavior in rats.\n\nMethods: This experimental study was conducted in the pharmacology department of Karachi University on locally bred male albino rats (n=24). These were divided into four treatment groups (Saline, Fluoxetine, Clozapine, and Choline) and measured the output at the 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 7th weeks. Familiar and Novel object recognition test and Passive avoidance test was used to observe learning and memory as well as the mechanism of cognition. One way-ANOVA and post-hoc analysis was done between groups. The p-value <0.05 and < 0.001 were considered statistically significant and highly significant respectively.\n \nResults: The comparative mean preference index percentage between saline, choline, clozapine, and fluoxetine at week one was non–significant (p>0.05) in the Novel and Familiar Object Recognition test. However, at week three it was highest for Fluoxetine (58.15±3.35) compared to Choline, Clozapine and Saline for the novel object. However, in Familiar objects, it was found highest for Clozapine (58.88±3.05) (p <0.05). Furthermore, the mean step-through latency time of the Passive Avoidance test was significant (p<0.05) at weeks three, five and seven. It was highest for choline (92.5±1.36) than fluoxetine and clozapine.\n\nConclusion: Fluoxetine has a significant effect (p<0.001) on memory and learning compared to Clozapine. Clozapine and choline showed statistically same results on cognitive behavior. \nKeywords: Cognitive Behavior; Choline; Clozapine; Fluoxetine; Effect; Compare.","PeriodicalId":231166,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medicine and Dentistry","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medicine and Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36283/pjmd11-1/006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Cognitive behavior therapy is an important treatment for various psychiatric and psychological problems. Different psychotherapeutic treatments are used for improvement in patients. The study aimed to compare Clozapine and Fluoxetine with Choline on the progress of cognition and cognitive behavior in rats. Methods: This experimental study was conducted in the pharmacology department of Karachi University on locally bred male albino rats (n=24). These were divided into four treatment groups (Saline, Fluoxetine, Clozapine, and Choline) and measured the output at the 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 7th weeks. Familiar and Novel object recognition test and Passive avoidance test was used to observe learning and memory as well as the mechanism of cognition. One way-ANOVA and post-hoc analysis was done between groups. The p-value <0.05 and < 0.001 were considered statistically significant and highly significant respectively. Results: The comparative mean preference index percentage between saline, choline, clozapine, and fluoxetine at week one was non–significant (p>0.05) in the Novel and Familiar Object Recognition test. However, at week three it was highest for Fluoxetine (58.15±3.35) compared to Choline, Clozapine and Saline for the novel object. However, in Familiar objects, it was found highest for Clozapine (58.88±3.05) (p <0.05). Furthermore, the mean step-through latency time of the Passive Avoidance test was significant (p<0.05) at weeks three, five and seven. It was highest for choline (92.5±1.36) than fluoxetine and clozapine. Conclusion: Fluoxetine has a significant effect (p<0.001) on memory and learning compared to Clozapine. Clozapine and choline showed statistically same results on cognitive behavior. Keywords: Cognitive Behavior; Choline; Clozapine; Fluoxetine; Effect; Compare.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胆碱与氯氮平、氟西汀对大鼠认知行为改善作用的比较
摘要背景:认知行为疗法是治疗各种精神和心理问题的重要方法。不同的心理治疗方法用于改善患者。本研究旨在比较氯氮平、氟西汀与胆碱对大鼠认知和认知行为的影响。方法:本实验在卡拉奇大学药学系对当地饲养的雄性白化大鼠(n=24)进行。这些患者被分为四个治疗组(生理盐水、氟西汀、氯氮平和胆碱),并在第1、3、5和7周测量产出量。采用熟悉新物体识别测验和被动回避测验观察学习记忆和认知机制。组间进行单因素方差分析和事后分析。新奇和熟悉物体识别测试的p值为0.05)。然而,与胆碱、氯氮平和生理盐水相比,氟西汀在第三周时的得分最高(58.15±3.35)。而在熟悉对象中,氯氮平最高(58.88±3.05)(p <0.05)。第三周、第五周和第七周被动回避测验的平均跨步潜伏期有显著性差异(p<0.05)。胆碱(92.5±1.36)高于氟西汀和氯氮平。结论:与氯氮平相比,氟西汀对记忆和学习有显著影响(p<0.001)。氯氮平和胆碱对认知行为的影响在统计学上是相同的。关键词:认知行为;胆碱;氯氮平;氟西汀;效果;比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Use of Hair Straightening Chemicals and Uterine Cancer Role of Injection Lidocaine with and without Triamcinolone Acetonide in the Management of Chronic Pain in Post-Operative Inguinal Hernioplasty No Action Today, No Cure Tomorrow - A Review of Agricultural Factors Predisposing Humans at The Risk of Antimicrobial Resistance and Its Preventive Strategies Body Locations of Leishmaniasis in the Targeted Population of Pakistan Laser Dentistry: Illuminating the Future of Dental Care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1