How to Calculate Turnover Rates (Accurately)

Kevin C Stanek
{"title":"How to Calculate Turnover Rates (Accurately)","authors":"Kevin C Stanek","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3311958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Turnover rates are foundational metrics of organizational health. Turnover rate calculations currently used by organizations and advocated by the largest associations of human resources professionals and management scholars are problematic for several reasons:<br><br>1. Calculations are approximations based on headcount snapshots taken at intervals (e.g., the end of each month) rather than captured continuously.<br><br>2. Organizations (and sometimes even functions within an organization) disagree regarding who is considered a separation and who is considered an employee (e.g., interns, employees on leaves of absence/furlough), which leads to difficulty in benchmarking between organizations.<br><br>3. Stakeholders’ turnover questions and metric interpretations are often not aligned with predominant formulae (e.g., the most frequently recommended and used turnover rate calculation does not answer the question, “What percent of employees left during a given period of time?”, even though that is how it is frequently interpreted).<br><br>I propose several solutions, including two reformulations of how turnover rates can be calculated:<br><br>1. Most accurate but radical: Switch to a turnover rate that measures the proportion of opportunities to separate that were realized (i.e., separations divided by the total number of opportunities to separate).<br><br>2. Less radical but still an improvement compared to the status quo: Switch to a turnover rate with finer-grained temporal resolution.<br><br>Most organizations could easily implement these changes with existing technology and personnel. Evolving to a more accurate turnover rate calculation would provide clearer and deeper insights about turnover trends within an organization and more comparable metrics across organizations.<br>","PeriodicalId":146189,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Personnel/Human Resources Practice (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Personnel/Human Resources Practice (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3311958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Turnover rates are foundational metrics of organizational health. Turnover rate calculations currently used by organizations and advocated by the largest associations of human resources professionals and management scholars are problematic for several reasons:

1. Calculations are approximations based on headcount snapshots taken at intervals (e.g., the end of each month) rather than captured continuously.

2. Organizations (and sometimes even functions within an organization) disagree regarding who is considered a separation and who is considered an employee (e.g., interns, employees on leaves of absence/furlough), which leads to difficulty in benchmarking between organizations.

3. Stakeholders’ turnover questions and metric interpretations are often not aligned with predominant formulae (e.g., the most frequently recommended and used turnover rate calculation does not answer the question, “What percent of employees left during a given period of time?”, even though that is how it is frequently interpreted).

I propose several solutions, including two reformulations of how turnover rates can be calculated:

1. Most accurate but radical: Switch to a turnover rate that measures the proportion of opportunities to separate that were realized (i.e., separations divided by the total number of opportunities to separate).

2. Less radical but still an improvement compared to the status quo: Switch to a turnover rate with finer-grained temporal resolution.

Most organizations could easily implement these changes with existing technology and personnel. Evolving to a more accurate turnover rate calculation would provide clearer and deeper insights about turnover trends within an organization and more comparable metrics across organizations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何(准确地)计算离职率
离职率是衡量组织健康的基本指标。目前由人力资源专业人士和管理学者组成的最大协会所提倡的组织所使用的离职率计算存在问题,原因如下:1。计算是基于每隔一段时间(例如,每个月底)的员工人数快照的近似值,而不是连续捕获。组织(有时甚至是组织内的职能部门)对谁被认为是离职者,谁被认为是雇员(例如,实习生,休假/休假的员工)存在分歧,这导致组织之间难以进行基准测试。利益相关者的离职问题和度量解释通常与主流公式不一致(例如,最常用的推荐和使用的离职率计算并没有回答这个问题,“在给定的时间内,员工离职的百分比是多少?”,尽管人们经常这样解释它)。我提出了几个解决方案,包括如何计算离职率的两个重新公式:最准确但最激进的方法是:转换到衡量已实现的分离机会的比例的周转率(即,分离除以分离机会的总数)。不太激进,但与现状相比仍然是一个改进:切换到具有更细粒度时间分辨率的周转率。大多数组织可以很容易地利用现有的技术和人员实现这些变更。发展到更准确的离职率计算将提供更清晰、更深入的见解,了解组织内的离职趋势,并在组织间提供更多可比较的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Human Resource Development (HRD) Practices on Organizational Effectiveness: A Review Hunting for talent: Firm-driven labor market search in the United States The Dark Web and Employer Liability How to Calculate Turnover Rates (Accurately) Competing for Promotion: Are 'The Best' Always the Best?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1