Pedestrian Modeling for Mitigation of Disease Transmission in a Simulated University Environment

Michael Schwartz, Cortnee R. Stainrod, Irin Nizam
{"title":"Pedestrian Modeling for Mitigation of Disease Transmission in a Simulated University Environment","authors":"Michael Schwartz, Cortnee R. Stainrod, Irin Nizam","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1001358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the spread of COVID-19 through mathematical modeling is an effective method of evaluating control interventions and the impact of infectious diseases. It is important to understand how individuals move and gather within indoor spaces as early awareness of specified strategies act as decision-making tools to riskier alternatives. On university campuses, indoor spaces pose unique threats due to high traffic spaces in the building hallways, restrooms and bottleneck points that lead to mass congregation and therefore increased risk of transmission. Evaluation of infectious diseases transmission as a result of pedestrian dynamics (e.g., pedestrian density, crowding, queue and wait times) was used to determine time-varying social distancing during pedestrian interactions/movements. Multiple campus buildings were modeled to demonstrate environments with varying size and complexity. Building models were constructed using the pedestrian features of AnyLogic. The proposed solution makes the following contributions by tracking the control measures of pedestrian dynamics at the microscopic level through temporal and spatial separation. This is done by enforcing social distancing through reducing the number of individual occupants at one time (i.e., segmented student population) and staggering start and end arrival times.The two greatest risk factors in the models were time and space. Entrances and exits to buildings, classrooms, and restrooms, and other queues forced simulated agents to cross the danger threshold as these building features were physical bottlenecks. Model results demonstrated sharp, but brief increases in transmission due to not staggering class arrival and departure times. Results indicated that controlling scheduling or forcing space assignments/social distancing were effective in reducing contacts and risk of spreading disease; however, the greatest reduction in risk of disease transmission occurred when both methods were used in conjunction. When class arrival and departure times are staggered, transmission between people not in the same class is only possible during chance encounters due to restroom visits, late arrivals, or early departures.","PeriodicalId":253093,"journal":{"name":"Global Issues: Disease Control and Pandemic Prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Issues: Disease Control and Pandemic Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1001358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the spread of COVID-19 through mathematical modeling is an effective method of evaluating control interventions and the impact of infectious diseases. It is important to understand how individuals move and gather within indoor spaces as early awareness of specified strategies act as decision-making tools to riskier alternatives. On university campuses, indoor spaces pose unique threats due to high traffic spaces in the building hallways, restrooms and bottleneck points that lead to mass congregation and therefore increased risk of transmission. Evaluation of infectious diseases transmission as a result of pedestrian dynamics (e.g., pedestrian density, crowding, queue and wait times) was used to determine time-varying social distancing during pedestrian interactions/movements. Multiple campus buildings were modeled to demonstrate environments with varying size and complexity. Building models were constructed using the pedestrian features of AnyLogic. The proposed solution makes the following contributions by tracking the control measures of pedestrian dynamics at the microscopic level through temporal and spatial separation. This is done by enforcing social distancing through reducing the number of individual occupants at one time (i.e., segmented student population) and staggering start and end arrival times.The two greatest risk factors in the models were time and space. Entrances and exits to buildings, classrooms, and restrooms, and other queues forced simulated agents to cross the danger threshold as these building features were physical bottlenecks. Model results demonstrated sharp, but brief increases in transmission due to not staggering class arrival and departure times. Results indicated that controlling scheduling or forcing space assignments/social distancing were effective in reducing contacts and risk of spreading disease; however, the greatest reduction in risk of disease transmission occurred when both methods were used in conjunction. When class arrival and departure times are staggered, transmission between people not in the same class is only possible during chance encounters due to restroom visits, late arrivals, or early departures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟大学环境中缓解疾病传播的行人建模
通过数学建模了解COVID-19的传播是评估控制干预措施和传染病影响的有效方法。重要的是要了解个人如何在室内空间内移动和聚集,因为对特定策略的早期意识可以作为风险较高的替代方案的决策工具。在大学校园里,由于建筑走廊、卫生间和瓶颈点的高流量空间导致大规模聚集,从而增加了传播风险,室内空间构成了独特的威胁。对行人动态(如行人密度、拥挤、排队和等待时间)导致的传染病传播进行评估,以确定行人相互作用/运动期间随时间变化的社会距离。对多个校园建筑进行建模,以展示不同大小和复杂程度的环境。利用AnyLogic的行人特征构建建筑模型。该方案通过时空分离在微观层面上跟踪行人动力学的控制措施,做出了以下贡献。这是通过减少一次个人居住者的数量(即分段的学生群体)和错开的开始和结束到达时间来加强社会距离来实现的。模型中两个最大的风险因素是时间和空间。建筑物、教室、卫生间和其他队列的入口和出口迫使模拟代理越过危险阈值,因为这些建筑物特征是物理瓶颈。模型结果显示,由于到达和离开班级的时间不一致,传播急剧但短暂地增加。结果表明,控制时间安排或强制空间分配/社会距离可有效减少接触和疾病传播风险;然而,当两种方法同时使用时,疾病传播风险的最大降低发生。当班级上下课时间错开时,不同班级的人之间的传播只有在因上厕所、迟到或早退而偶然相遇时才有可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Risk of COVID-19 infection and prevention and control strategies in universities Service Disruptions and Recovery: Lessons from the Chinese hotel industry for the post-COVID-19 Era Bulgarian Public Administration’s Social Media Communications Strategies During COVID-19 Crisis Challenges and Associated Mental Stress During COVID-19 Work Adaptation among Employees in Ireland COVID Choices: Research and Online System for Main Street Decision Making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1