Identifying domain-specific defect classes using inspections and change history

Taiga Nakamura, L. Hochstein, V. Basili
{"title":"Identifying domain-specific defect classes using inspections and change history","authors":"Taiga Nakamura, L. Hochstein, V. Basili","doi":"10.1145/1159733.1159785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present an iterative, reading-based methodology for analyzing defects in source code when change history is available. Our bottom-up approach can be applied to build knowledge of recurring defects in a specific domain, even if other sources of defect data such as defect reports and change requests are unavailable, incomplete or at the wrong level of abstraction for the purposes of the defect analysis. After defining the methodology, we present the results of an empirical study where our method was applied to analyze defects in parallel programs which use the MPI (Message Passing Interface) library to express parallelism. This library is often used in the domain of high performance computing, where there is much discussion but little empirical data about the frequency and severity of defect types. Preliminary results indicate the methodology is feasible and can provide insights into the nature of real defects. We present the results, derived hypothesis, and lessons learned.","PeriodicalId":201305,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering","volume":"299 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1159733.1159785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

We present an iterative, reading-based methodology for analyzing defects in source code when change history is available. Our bottom-up approach can be applied to build knowledge of recurring defects in a specific domain, even if other sources of defect data such as defect reports and change requests are unavailable, incomplete or at the wrong level of abstraction for the purposes of the defect analysis. After defining the methodology, we present the results of an empirical study where our method was applied to analyze defects in parallel programs which use the MPI (Message Passing Interface) library to express parallelism. This library is often used in the domain of high performance computing, where there is much discussion but little empirical data about the frequency and severity of defect types. Preliminary results indicate the methodology is feasible and can provide insights into the nature of real defects. We present the results, derived hypothesis, and lessons learned.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用检查和变更历史来识别特定于领域的缺陷类
我们提出了一种迭代的、基于阅读的方法,用于在变更历史可用时分析源代码中的缺陷。我们的自底向上方法可以应用于构建特定领域中重复出现的缺陷的知识,即使缺陷数据的其他来源,如缺陷报告和变更请求是不可用的,不完整的,或者处于错误的抽象级别,以进行缺陷分析。在定义了方法之后,我们提出了一项实证研究的结果,在该研究中,我们的方法被应用于分析使用MPI(消息传递接口)库来表达并行性的并行程序中的缺陷。这个库经常用于高性能计算领域,在这个领域有很多讨论,但是很少有关于缺陷类型的频率和严重程度的经验数据。初步结果表明,该方法是可行的,并且可以提供对实际缺陷本质的见解。我们提出了结果、推导的假设和经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An empirical study of developers views on software reuse in statoil ASA Agile customer engagement: a longitudinal qualitative case study Evaluating advantages of test driven development: a controlled experiment with professionals Evaluating guidelines for empirical software engineering studies Maximising the information gained from an experimental analysis of code inspection and static analysis for concurrent java components
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1