Civic Education and Communication in Aristotle

Yunrak Sohn
{"title":"Civic Education and Communication in Aristotle","authors":"Yunrak Sohn","doi":"10.33422/8hps.2018.10.120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is the first step of a wider research plan to improve the democratic citizenship in South Korea through communication education, and to find a better method of civic education, which means the education for students to be good citizens. After examining the context of extensive issues on social communication and education in the history of ancient Greece, it aims to find the source of the concept of ‘communicating citizen’(civis communicans) in Aristotle’s ethics, political science, and rhetoric, in which Aristotle deals with the citizens and the state. What should be the civic education with the keyword of communication? A clue to find a solution of this question in Aristotle comes from a phrase that defines man as a political animal and at the same time defines it as the only animal with logos. This passage is important because, when Aristotle says here the difference of human from all the other animals is ‘logos,’ he describes logos as not only the ability to ‘think and to discern’ but also the ability to ‘talk and communicate’. According to these thoughts of Aristotle, a man does not think alone or speak alone, but grows up combining these two abilities while being educated in the home and society. Then, he lives not only thinking and discerning, but also participating in public affairs as a citizen by communicating with others in the state. It is a life to practice being a good citizen as a member of the community of Polis while pursuing personally to be a good person. And this is the image of ‘good man, good citizen’, which is the ideal goal of civic education pursued by this research.","PeriodicalId":340030,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference On Humanities, Psychology and Social Science","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference On Humanities, Psychology and Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/8hps.2018.10.120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study is the first step of a wider research plan to improve the democratic citizenship in South Korea through communication education, and to find a better method of civic education, which means the education for students to be good citizens. After examining the context of extensive issues on social communication and education in the history of ancient Greece, it aims to find the source of the concept of ‘communicating citizen’(civis communicans) in Aristotle’s ethics, political science, and rhetoric, in which Aristotle deals with the citizens and the state. What should be the civic education with the keyword of communication? A clue to find a solution of this question in Aristotle comes from a phrase that defines man as a political animal and at the same time defines it as the only animal with logos. This passage is important because, when Aristotle says here the difference of human from all the other animals is ‘logos,’ he describes logos as not only the ability to ‘think and to discern’ but also the ability to ‘talk and communicate’. According to these thoughts of Aristotle, a man does not think alone or speak alone, but grows up combining these two abilities while being educated in the home and society. Then, he lives not only thinking and discerning, but also participating in public affairs as a citizen by communicating with others in the state. It is a life to practice being a good citizen as a member of the community of Polis while pursuing personally to be a good person. And this is the image of ‘good man, good citizen’, which is the ideal goal of civic education pursued by this research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚里士多德的公民教育与交流
本研究是一个更广泛的研究计划的第一步,旨在通过传播教育来改善韩国的民主公民,并找到更好的公民教育方法,即教育学生成为好公民。在考察了古希腊历史上关于社会沟通和教育的广泛问题的背景之后,它旨在找到亚里士多德伦理学,政治学和修辞学中“沟通公民”(civis communicans)概念的来源,亚里士多德在其中处理公民和国家。以传播为关键词的公民教育应该是什么?亚里士多德有句话,将人定义为政治动物,同时也将人定义为唯一具有逻各斯的动物,为找到这个问题的答案提供了线索。这一段很重要,因为当亚里士多德说人类与其他动物的区别在于“逻各斯”时,他不仅将逻各斯描述为“思考和辨别”的能力,还包括“交谈和交流”的能力。根据亚里士多德的这些思想,一个人并不是独自思考或独自说话,而是在家庭和社会的教育下成长起来,将这两种能力结合起来。然后,他的生活不仅仅是思考和辨别,而是作为一个公民参与公共事务,与国家中的其他人交流。作为城邦社会的一员,这是一种实践成为一个好公民的生活,同时个人也在追求成为一个好人。这就是“好人、好公民”的形象,也是本研究所追求的公民教育的理想目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
National Identity of the Czechs in Croatia in the Time of Globalization Civic Education and Communication in Aristotle The function of urban public spaces in medium size cities in Greece. First evaluation for Chalkida, Greece Capital Structure, Financial Flexibility and Real Options Exploring barriers to accessing Primary Care Psychology services in Ireland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1