Charitable Nonprofits’ Use of Noncompetition Agreements: Having the Best of Both Worlds

Lindsey D. Blanchard
{"title":"Charitable Nonprofits’ Use of Noncompetition Agreements: Having the Best of Both Worlds","authors":"Lindsey D. Blanchard","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2227123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For years, individuals have been challenging the noncompetition agreements they entered into with their employers on the basis that the agreements violate public policy. However, in a competitive marketplace, courts and legislatures in many jurisdictions are reluctant to invalidate otherwise reasonable noncompetition agreements. Perhaps they are right, at least when it comes to the general class of nonprofits and to nonprofits that are protecting their interests against for-profit entities. As for charitable — or § 501(c)(3) — nonprofits that are attempting to protect their interests against other charitable nonprofits, however, the decision-making bodies should reconsider their position. Unlike traditional for-profit entities, whose main goal is profit maximization, charitable nonprofits are organized and operated to benefit some greater good. As a result, charitable nonprofits receive donations from individuals and corporations, as well as tax breaks from the government, which are unavailable to for-profit entities. At the same time, charitable nonprofits use many of the same tools that for-profit firms utilize to maximize profits, including noncompetition agreements. Thus, charitable nonprofits are able to benefit from an anti-competition, profit-maximizing tool while also reaping the rewards of their tax-exempt status. In short, charitable nonprofits (wrongly) enjoy the best of both the for-profit and nonprofit worlds. This article discusses the unique nature of the charitable nonprofit’s mission and the tax benefits conferred on charitable nonprofits by the federal and state governments. It then discusses noncompetition agreements and demonstrates that charitable nonprofits’ use of noncompetition agreements is contrary to their mission and tax-exempt status, as well as to the public interest. Finally, the article proposes an amendment to the federal tax code that would render unenforceable any language in a noncompetition agreement that prevents an individual from leaving the employment of one charitable nonprofit for employment at another.","PeriodicalId":135383,"journal":{"name":"Nonprofit & Philanthropy Law eJournal","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nonprofit & Philanthropy Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2227123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

For years, individuals have been challenging the noncompetition agreements they entered into with their employers on the basis that the agreements violate public policy. However, in a competitive marketplace, courts and legislatures in many jurisdictions are reluctant to invalidate otherwise reasonable noncompetition agreements. Perhaps they are right, at least when it comes to the general class of nonprofits and to nonprofits that are protecting their interests against for-profit entities. As for charitable — or § 501(c)(3) — nonprofits that are attempting to protect their interests against other charitable nonprofits, however, the decision-making bodies should reconsider their position. Unlike traditional for-profit entities, whose main goal is profit maximization, charitable nonprofits are organized and operated to benefit some greater good. As a result, charitable nonprofits receive donations from individuals and corporations, as well as tax breaks from the government, which are unavailable to for-profit entities. At the same time, charitable nonprofits use many of the same tools that for-profit firms utilize to maximize profits, including noncompetition agreements. Thus, charitable nonprofits are able to benefit from an anti-competition, profit-maximizing tool while also reaping the rewards of their tax-exempt status. In short, charitable nonprofits (wrongly) enjoy the best of both the for-profit and nonprofit worlds. This article discusses the unique nature of the charitable nonprofit’s mission and the tax benefits conferred on charitable nonprofits by the federal and state governments. It then discusses noncompetition agreements and demonstrates that charitable nonprofits’ use of noncompetition agreements is contrary to their mission and tax-exempt status, as well as to the public interest. Finally, the article proposes an amendment to the federal tax code that would render unenforceable any language in a noncompetition agreement that prevents an individual from leaving the employment of one charitable nonprofit for employment at another.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慈善非营利组织对竞业禁止协议的使用:两全其美
多年来,个人一直在挑战他们与雇主签订的竞业禁止协议,理由是这些协议违反了公共政策。然而,在竞争激烈的市场中,许多司法管辖区的法院和立法机构不愿使其他合理的竞业禁止协议无效。也许他们是对的,至少对于一般的非营利组织和那些保护自身利益不受营利性实体侵害的非营利组织来说是这样。然而,对于那些试图保护自己的利益不受其他慈善非营利组织侵害的慈善组织(或§501(c)(3)),决策机构应该重新考虑他们的立场。与以利润最大化为主要目标的传统营利性实体不同,慈善非营利组织的组织和运作都是为了实现更大的利益。因此,慈善非营利组织接受个人和企业的捐赠,并享受政府的税收优惠,而这些是营利性实体无法享受的。与此同时,慈善非营利组织使用许多与营利公司相同的工具来实现利润最大化,包括竞业禁止协议。因此,慈善非营利组织能够从反竞争、利润最大化的工具中受益,同时也获得免税地位的回报。简而言之,慈善非营利组织(错误地)享受着营利性和非营利组织的双重好处。本文讨论了慈善非营利组织使命的独特性,以及联邦和州政府赋予慈善非营利组织的税收优惠。然后讨论了竞业禁止协议,并证明慈善非营利组织使用竞业禁止协议违背了他们的使命和免税地位,也违背了公共利益。最后,文章提出了一项联邦税法修正案,该修正案将使竞业禁止协议中任何阻止个人从一家慈善非营利组织离职到另一家慈善非营利组织工作的条款无效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Governance and Accountability: A Systematic Review to Examine Its Impact on Social Mission in Nonprofit Organizations Legal Issues in Mutual Aid Operations: A Preliminary Guide Political Justice and Tax Policy: The Social Welfare Organization Case Examining the Impact of Divestment from Fossil Fuels on University Endowments The Private Foundation Excise Tax on Self-Dealing: Contours, Comparisons, and Character
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1