Against the Anthropocene: Pathways through the More-than-human Realms and Ontological Anthropology in Indonesia

Gilang Mahadika, Setiadi Setiadi
{"title":"Against the Anthropocene: Pathways through the More-than-human Realms and Ontological Anthropology in Indonesia","authors":"Gilang Mahadika, Setiadi Setiadi","doi":"10.29037/digitalpress.49441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We are now living in the epoch of Anthropocene—the epoch \nwherein human and nonhuman beings have become increasingly involved. The \nAnthropocene was also a mark to determine human existence begin to overwhelm \nbiological and geological forms and displace the Holocene era. Indonesia is the one in many countries \nfacing ecological crisis. The widespread of global monocultures such as \nsugarcane, cacao, oil palm and tea plantations are examples of providing an \nintolerance of diversity, meaning that only putting human desires above \nall of nonhuman species. The era also shows the struggles for social \njustice towards nonhuman beings. Hence, this paper expects to discuss \nconceptual and pragmatical levels of the Anthropocene in the more-than-humans’ anthropological \nstudies. Meanwhile, anthropology and any sub-disciplines take “ontological \nturn” into account. Talking ontological anthropology is also a way of \nrethinking and requestioning the division and dichotomy between nature and \nculture, technology and society, human, and nonhuman beings, and so on. So, our \nresearch question is how “ontological turn” contributes to making social \njustice towards multispecies and geological life. Justice has been a great deal to preserve only humans based on \nEurocentric perception and thought. By giving social justice to more-than-human \nrealms is also resolving both “epistemologies of ignorance” and indigenous-led \ndecolonization. Alternatively, ontological anthropology provides the ability to \ngive a “voice” to more-than-human beings in order to have equal footing as \nhumans. Therefore, against the Anthropocene means collapsing ‘the divide’ \nbetween culture and nature, human and non-human, and so on. Besides, the turn \nto anthropology of ontology also means demanding collaborations and balance \nbetween humans and nonhuman beings in the Anthropocene. The introductory \nanthropology of ontology could potentially open pathways of future \npossibilities for methodological and theoretical standpoints towards \nmore-than-human realms in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":270635,"journal":{"name":"Digital Press Social Sciences and Humanities","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Press Social Sciences and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29037/digitalpress.49441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We are now living in the epoch of Anthropocene—the epoch wherein human and nonhuman beings have become increasingly involved. The Anthropocene was also a mark to determine human existence begin to overwhelm biological and geological forms and displace the Holocene era. Indonesia is the one in many countries facing ecological crisis. The widespread of global monocultures such as sugarcane, cacao, oil palm and tea plantations are examples of providing an intolerance of diversity, meaning that only putting human desires above all of nonhuman species. The era also shows the struggles for social justice towards nonhuman beings. Hence, this paper expects to discuss conceptual and pragmatical levels of the Anthropocene in the more-than-humans’ anthropological studies. Meanwhile, anthropology and any sub-disciplines take “ontological turn” into account. Talking ontological anthropology is also a way of rethinking and requestioning the division and dichotomy between nature and culture, technology and society, human, and nonhuman beings, and so on. So, our research question is how “ontological turn” contributes to making social justice towards multispecies and geological life. Justice has been a great deal to preserve only humans based on Eurocentric perception and thought. By giving social justice to more-than-human realms is also resolving both “epistemologies of ignorance” and indigenous-led decolonization. Alternatively, ontological anthropology provides the ability to give a “voice” to more-than-human beings in order to have equal footing as humans. Therefore, against the Anthropocene means collapsing ‘the divide’ between culture and nature, human and non-human, and so on. Besides, the turn to anthropology of ontology also means demanding collaborations and balance between humans and nonhuman beings in the Anthropocene. The introductory anthropology of ontology could potentially open pathways of future possibilities for methodological and theoretical standpoints towards more-than-human realms in Indonesia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反对人类世:途径通过超过人类领域和本体论人类学在印度尼西亚
我们现在生活在人类世的时代——人类和非人类越来越多地参与进来的时代。人类世也是一个标志,决定了人类的存在开始压倒生物和地质形式,取代了全新世时代。印尼是众多国家中面临生态危机的一个。甘蔗、可可、油棕和茶园等全球单一栽培的广泛存在就是不容忍多样性的例子,这意味着只把人类的欲望放在所有非人类物种之上。这个时代也展现了对非人类争取社会正义的斗争。因此,本文期望在超越人类的人类学研究中讨论人类世的概念和实用层面。同时,人类学及其分支学科也考虑到“本体论转向”。谈本体论人类学也是对自然与文化、技术与社会、人与非人等的划分和二分法进行反思和再追问的一种方式。因此,我们的研究问题是“本体论转向”如何促进对多物种和地质生命的社会公正。基于欧洲中心的观念和思想,正义一直是保护人类的重要手段。通过赋予超越人类的领域社会正义,也解决了“无知的认识论”和土著领导的非殖民化。另外,本体论人类学提供了赋予超越人类的“声音”的能力,以便与人类拥有平等的地位。因此,反对人类世意味着消除文化与自然、人类与非人类等等之间的“鸿沟”。此外,本体论的人类学转向也意味着人类世要求人类与非人类之间的合作与平衡。本体论的入门人类学可能潜在地为印度尼西亚超越人类领域的方法论和理论立场开辟未来可能性的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Readiness of Course and Training Agency (LKP) in Link & Match Program with Business and Industry Sector A Systematic Review: Community Support in Employment Skill Development of Intellectual Disabilities People The Role of the Community in Building a Tourist Village Intuition linguistique et stratégie de l’apprentissage des étudiants « faibles » Le modèle d’apprentissage de la production orale à travers Skype basé sur la culture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1