Comparative study of line roughness metrics of chemically amplified and inorganic resists for EUV

R. Fallica, E. Buitrago, Y. Ekinci
{"title":"Comparative study of line roughness metrics of chemically amplified and inorganic resists for EUV","authors":"R. Fallica, E. Buitrago, Y. Ekinci","doi":"10.1117/12.2217766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a comprehensive study of the roughness metrics of different resists. Dense line/space (L/S) images of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), hydrogen silsesquioxane (HSQ), different chemically amplified resists (CARs), and metal oxide based resists have been patterned by extreme ultraviolet interference lithography (EUV-IL). The three line width roughness metrics: r.m.s. value σLWR, correlation length ξ and roughness exponent α, were measured by metrological analysis of top down SEM images and compared for the different resists imaged here. It was found, that all metrics are required to fully describe the roughness of each resist. Our measurements indicate that few of the state-of-the- art resists tested here can meet the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) requirements for σLWR. The correlation length ξ has been found to be considerably higher in polymer-based materials in comparison to non-polymers. The roughness exponent α, interpreted using the concept of fractal geometry, is mainly affected by acid diffusion in CARs where it produces line edges with a higher complexity than in non-CAR resists. These results indicate that different resists platforms show very different LWR resist metrics and roughness is not only manifested in the σLWR but in all parameters. Therefore, all roughness metrics should be taken into account in the performance comparison of the resist, since they can have a substantial impact on the device performance.","PeriodicalId":193904,"journal":{"name":"SPIE Advanced Lithography","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPIE Advanced Lithography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2217766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We present a comprehensive study of the roughness metrics of different resists. Dense line/space (L/S) images of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), hydrogen silsesquioxane (HSQ), different chemically amplified resists (CARs), and metal oxide based resists have been patterned by extreme ultraviolet interference lithography (EUV-IL). The three line width roughness metrics: r.m.s. value σLWR, correlation length ξ and roughness exponent α, were measured by metrological analysis of top down SEM images and compared for the different resists imaged here. It was found, that all metrics are required to fully describe the roughness of each resist. Our measurements indicate that few of the state-of-the- art resists tested here can meet the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) requirements for σLWR. The correlation length ξ has been found to be considerably higher in polymer-based materials in comparison to non-polymers. The roughness exponent α, interpreted using the concept of fractal geometry, is mainly affected by acid diffusion in CARs where it produces line edges with a higher complexity than in non-CAR resists. These results indicate that different resists platforms show very different LWR resist metrics and roughness is not only manifested in the σLWR but in all parameters. Therefore, all roughness metrics should be taken into account in the performance comparison of the resist, since they can have a substantial impact on the device performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EUV用化学放大和无机电阻线粗糙度指标的比较研究
我们提出了一个全面的研究粗糙度指标的不同的阻力。利用极紫外干涉光刻技术(EUV-IL)对聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)、氢硅氧烷(HSQ)、不同的化学放大抗蚀剂(CARs)和金属氧化物基抗蚀剂进行了密集线/空(L/S)成像。采用自顶向下扫描电镜(SEM)图像的计量分析方法,测量了三种线宽粗糙度指标:均方根值σLWR、相关长度ξ和粗糙度指数α。我们发现,所有的指标都需要完全描述每个抗蚀剂的粗糙度。我们的测量表明,在这里测试的最先进的电阻中,很少能满足国际半导体技术路线图(ITRS)对σLWR的要求。相关长度ξ已被发现是相当高的聚合物基材料相比,非聚合物。使用分形几何概念解释的粗糙度指数α主要受酸扩散的影响,在car中产生的线边缘比在非car中产生的线边缘更复杂。结果表明,不同抗蚀剂平台的抗蚀指标差异很大,粗糙度不仅体现在σLWR上,而且体现在各参数上。因此,在抗蚀剂的性能比较中应考虑所有粗糙度指标,因为它们可能对器件性能产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SEM based overlay measurement between resist and buried patterns Contrast optimization for 0.33NA EUV lithography Analysis of wafer heating in 14nm DUV layers GPU accelerated Monte-Carlo simulation of SEM images for metrology Lensless hyperspectral spectromicroscopy with a tabletop extreme-ultraviolet source
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1